XJT ALPA CPP update.
#31
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
I think you're right about the long term strategy, but I think it will take a long time to play out. The thing Mesa has that XJT doesn't is a large stable of 175 pilots who are ready to fly tomorrow. It's going to take a long time for XJT to hire and train enough people to staff the 30 175's that are coming available for re-assignment now/soon. Mesa owns 18 of the 175's they are flying for UA out of IAH. 12 of the others have agreements in place through Dec 2023. So there are 30 that could be considered "in play" in the near term. Considering that more new 175's at XJT might just be replacing large CRJs from the UA fleet, I don't think the Mesa 175's are going anywhere soon, assuming Mesa can staff them.
The UAL 175s at MESA are on 5 yr cpas, only need 90 day notice to be returned to UAL. It doesn't matter what hub/base they are in currently.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...709dex1095.htm
Read page 9. The dates of the first 30 with the sch exit dates.
#32
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...709dex1095.htm
Read page 9. The dates of the first 30 with the sch exit dates.
The key point is who has pilots to fly them at any given time.
#33
Banned
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
There is no need for a flow... The whipsaw will always continue in the regional industry. In about a month or so Ual will announce another 40 175's going to XJT, Mesa contract will expire shifting planes over to Xjt and the bottom half of Mesa seniority list to leave Mesa for XJT, we are our own worst enemy. The whipsaw will always remain! Sad, but true.
#34
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
#36
Besides, many others have pointed out that such agreements are commonly broken in this industry. SkyWest's 10-K has huge sections discussing how their contracts with mainline partners are subject to interpretation and disagreements about the interpretations are common, often ending in arbitration or litigation.
We'll all know soon enough, I guess.
#37
Nonsense Spewer
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: In the corner using a lampshade as a hat.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
Has anyone actually seen the contract/agreement? All of the news reports that I saw said "dual-class" aircraft, which could include CRJ550's.
Besides, many others have pointed out that such agreements are commonly broken in this industry. SkyWest's 10-K has huge sections discussing how their contracts with mainline partners are subject to interpretation and disagreements about the interpretations are common, often ending in arbitration or litigation.
We'll all know soon enough, I guess.
Besides, many others have pointed out that such agreements are commonly broken in this industry. SkyWest's 10-K has huge sections discussing how their contracts with mainline partners are subject to interpretation and disagreements about the interpretations are common, often ending in arbitration or litigation.
We'll all know soon enough, I guess.
#39
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Go Jet is giving up some of their birds for Delta. At no point are they receiving any from OO (Skywest)
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Go Jet is giving up some of their birds for Delta. At no point are they receiving any from OO (Skywest)
Go Jet is giving up some of their birds for Delta. At no point are they receiving any from OO (Skywest)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



