The Deal's Not Done
#392
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
If they are legacy asa you're correct. They loved their PBS the way it was. I'd be shocked if management offered that version of pbs to us. With Subodh at the helm I dont expect anything that will benefit us.
#393
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
That's great, unfortunately vacation bidding will be negatively affected by PBS and as others have said PBS is not so great for a pilot group when we're understaffed.
Do you really think PBS will give everyone 18 days off a month? No, you know you're ultra senior and it positively affects you more than others. Not to mention the younger pilots and new hires are already paying increased health insurance costs for the very senior lifers here. PBS would not allow them line improvement and QOL gains.
Boomers...
Skip.
Do you really think PBS will give everyone 18 days off a month? No, you know you're ultra senior and it positively affects you more than others. Not to mention the younger pilots and new hires are already paying increased health insurance costs for the very senior lifers here. PBS would not allow them line improvement and QOL gains.
Boomers...
Skip.
I like the snippet about insurance.... idiotic comment of the week right there. I’m not sure if he was pointing it out or truly a bit annoyed, but pure ignorance once again. Maybe it has more to do with the ATL corporate people being moved from the ASA United Healthcare plan to the XJT Blue Cross plan, and less to do with the age of the pilot group. Just a thought.
#394
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Then we won’t get it. And something like vacation low isn’t a “benefit” - it maintains the stays quo. How much is a week of vacation worth? 2 weeks off? The company offers a way to get the same time off for vacation or they don’t, and we stay with what we have. Given those options, why wouldn’t they go back to the ASA system?
#395
Banned
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
This is so full of you know what. I can honestly say, I was a junior captain at ASA when PBS came along, and the entire group was skeptical of the whole deal, and yes I GOT A BETTER SCHEDULE WITH PBS THAN WITH LINE BIDDING! You don’t know what your talking about.
I like the snippet about insurance.... idiotic comment of the week right there. I’m not sure if he was pointing it out or truly a bit annoyed, but pure ignorance once again. Maybe it has more to do with the ATL corporate people being moved from the ASA United Healthcare plan to the XJT Blue Cross plan, and less to do with the age of the pilot group. Just a thought.
I like the snippet about insurance.... idiotic comment of the week right there. I’m not sure if he was pointing it out or truly a bit annoyed, but pure ignorance once again. Maybe it has more to do with the ATL corporate people being moved from the ASA United Healthcare plan to the XJT Blue Cross plan, and less to do with the age of the pilot group. Just a thought.
From the union:
"For those who are wondering why the premiums for the PPO 1500 and the HDHP plans increased so much, it is because we are a smaller and older group than in previous years, plus we also had a 47% increase in cancer treatments this last year."
You're not living in reality. The CRJ's and the Atlanta base aren't coming back and neither is the PBS that you were used to.
#396
Banned
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
PBS can be disasterous when understaffed. The company sets a minimum credit threshold that EVERY awarded schedule has to hit regardless of seniority.
If there’s no staffing, the credit threshold can be over 90 hours and sometimes approach 100 hours for every pilot in the system.
Just think: 95 hours indefinitely with your only option being to trade down to lower value trips (maybe), but rarely an extra day off. Increasing time off in a vacation month? Not likely. Unless you have a vacation-low feature which is very, very unlikely to return.
Seeing as how that’s our new modus operandi, they will exploit it to its fullest.
Touch-drop line bidding with ILIW is not worth giving up. They will try.
If there’s no staffing, the credit threshold can be over 90 hours and sometimes approach 100 hours for every pilot in the system.
Just think: 95 hours indefinitely with your only option being to trade down to lower value trips (maybe), but rarely an extra day off. Increasing time off in a vacation month? Not likely. Unless you have a vacation-low feature which is very, very unlikely to return.
Seeing as how that’s our new modus operandi, they will exploit it to its fullest.
Touch-drop line bidding with ILIW is not worth giving up. They will try.
#397
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
So if your PBS scheduled you 95 hours per month, about how many 'actual hours' would that equate to?
Seems to me at 95 hrs/mth you'd hit your 1000 hrs in month 9 or 10 (depending on if you picked up any open time), leaving Nov & Dec with no pilots with hours to fly, and if that happens, United wouldn't be to happy????
Seems to me at 95 hrs/mth you'd hit your 1000 hrs in month 9 or 10 (depending on if you picked up any open time), leaving Nov & Dec with no pilots with hours to fly, and if that happens, United wouldn't be to happy????
#398
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
One thing people forget too, there is nothing in the contract to guarantee anything more than 12 days off. This whole globalization concept with smartpref throws seniority out the window if the system cannot come up with a solution. SAY NO TO PBS.
#399
So if your PBS scheduled you 95 hours per month, about how many 'actual hours' would that equate to?
Seems to me at 95 hrs/mth you'd hit your 1000 hrs in month 9 or 10 (depending on if you picked up any open time), leaving Nov & Dec with no pilots with hours to fly, and if that happens, United wouldn't be to happy????
Seems to me at 95 hrs/mth you'd hit your 1000 hrs in month 9 or 10 (depending on if you picked up any open time), leaving Nov & Dec with no pilots with hours to fly, and if that happens, United wouldn't be to happy????
#400
Although the “CRJ PBS” bidding and “ERJ Line” bidding are an argument far off topic from a discussion that is about management currently stiffing the pilot group, I’ll chime in....
I know at times we all like to label people of a certain origins, using negative characterization. Ignoring all that, any pilot that flew a CRJ (bad or good) under the CRJ contract would tell you that 90 hours of credit awarded by PBS and 90 hours of credit awarded through the current line bidding system yields a vastly different result regarding days off. A schedule with 12 days off using PBS under the CRJ contract would almost always credit over 100hours. The perks of duty rigs and fair min day pay credit.
I would agree that using the Flica PBS process under this current contract would result in less than awesome schedules. It’s all about the work rules. The company knows this. I’m assuming the union knows this too.
It’s not the bidding system that gets you optimal schedules, it’s the work rules that apply to the bidding process. In the end, using an archaic process of awarding schedules that, virtually know one understands (at least that’s what they want to tell you when you ask questions about it) is only letting the company win.
We ALL deserve better. Demand better work rules and you’ll forget all about the process that you bid under.
I know at times we all like to label people of a certain origins, using negative characterization. Ignoring all that, any pilot that flew a CRJ (bad or good) under the CRJ contract would tell you that 90 hours of credit awarded by PBS and 90 hours of credit awarded through the current line bidding system yields a vastly different result regarding days off. A schedule with 12 days off using PBS under the CRJ contract would almost always credit over 100hours. The perks of duty rigs and fair min day pay credit.
I would agree that using the Flica PBS process under this current contract would result in less than awesome schedules. It’s all about the work rules. The company knows this. I’m assuming the union knows this too.
It’s not the bidding system that gets you optimal schedules, it’s the work rules that apply to the bidding process. In the end, using an archaic process of awarding schedules that, virtually know one understands (at least that’s what they want to tell you when you ask questions about it) is only letting the company win.
We ALL deserve better. Demand better work rules and you’ll forget all about the process that you bid under.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



