![]() |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879258)
Again, there are nearly 100 CAs in IAH below the person you are referring to. For the purposes of total transparency is this not an important fact?
There's only 140 captains in IAH right now. Are you seriously trying to sell that a 4-14 hire is number 40 in base? A new low for you. |
Originally Posted by SureJetz
(Post 2879270)
You mean the one's listed on the bid pack at ULA? Those are pilots who have left silly. They list them as ULA until they're gone for 6 months and then remove them from the bid packet.
There's only 140 captains in IAH right now. Are you seriously trying to sell that a 4-14 hire is number 40 in base? A new low for you. |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879287)
Ok now you are educating me. Like I said I am a new hire. I’m just looking at the seniority list. There are over 300 CAs listed at IAH. So why do we list everyone who has left as a CA at IAH? Were they all CAs? Were they all based at IAH?
Watching the two of you argue is like CNN and Fox News. You’re both overly biased and pushing an agenda. |
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2879299)
It’s not just guys on EMP leave. It’s also MED leave, MGMT pilots, ALPA guys on trip loss, and Training Center guys. If you’re an instructor, you show as IAH-based even if you can’t hold it by seniority.
Watching the two of you argue is like CNN and Fox News. You’re both overly biased and pushing an agenda. So can we say that the Commuter Hotels and duty rigs have “bipartisan support?” LOL |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879300)
Thanks, so if a ORD CA leaves he is shown as an IAH CA? What about FOs?
So can we say that the Commuter Hotels and duty rigs have “bipartisan support?” LOL The only exception is the IAH FO list since it has new hires as well before they get their base assigned after training. |
Originally Posted by SureJetz
(Post 2879323)
It's broken down by base and seat position. ORD ULA/EMP leaves don't get put on the IAH list.
The only exception is the IAH FO list since it has new hires as well before they get their base assigned after training. How sure are you that all 100 were base transfers? Could it be they were awarded on a previous bid? |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879334)
So there are 283 145 IAH CAs on the list. If there are only 140 total IAH CAs, does that mean 140 of them have already left? And of the 100 on the list more Jr than a 2007 hire, all of them have left?
How sure are you that all 100 were base transfers? Could it be they were awarded on a previous bid? How is it that you're dolling out all this advice when you don't even know how the bid/seniority list and ULA works? |
Originally Posted by SureJetz
(Post 2879339)
We were talking about the 4/14 upgrade, now you're talking about a 2007 hire. Why do you keep changing the topic?
How is it that you're dolling out all this advice when you don't even know how the bid/seniority list and ULA works? |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879341)
There are 94 pilots on the list between the ‘07 hire you have been referring to and the 4/14 hire I have been referring to. I am asking you to explain that to me.
Dude. You gotta quit playing games. Everyone on this forum can see right through you. We were all new hires at one point. No one ever acted this way. What ever management crap you are tying to pull, it’s only making things worse. Awareness is catching up and the lies are getting harder to spread. If XJT is such a great place, what are you worried about? All those saying negative things are just complainers with nothing to back it up. Things will be juuuusst fine. So let it go. |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879341)
There are 94 pilots on the list between the ‘07 hire you have been referring to and the 4/14 hire I have been referring to. I am asking you to explain that to me.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:14 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands