Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Upgrade Time By Base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2019 | 03:43 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
So is it really accurate to say the upgrade time to IAH is 12 years if 1/3 of the CAs in that base have been hired after that date?
No, it is not accurate. Junior IAH CA was awarded in 19-03 and is a 04/14 hire. The other guy was awarded in 19-04 and had bypassed upgrade on previous bids. When another bid comes open in the future with more IAH CA 145 slots, it is likely that you will see some junior awards again.
Reply
Old 08-31-2019 | 02:14 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Reclined seat
Default

OK, here is some actual facts for people:
  • The most junior captain in IAH is 4/2014. Then there is 4 people from 3/14, 1 person in 2/14, and 1 person 1/14.
  • EWR has 2 people from 10/16 and 4 people from 9/16 as CA.
  • ORD is a 8/13 hire date.
  • CLE is a 1/16 hire date.

These are active employees based off the current seniority list. Swapping is is not a true award. I do expect it to continue to fall with EWR continuing to be the most junior, followed by IAH, CLE, and then ORD. TYS is out of the question since it's so small. The more we hire, the more we can fly, which means the more upgrades we get. I'm not as optimistic that by the end of this year we will see the upgrade award fall to 2 years, but I do fully expect to see upgrades at about 2 years in 2020 sometime.
Reply
Old 09-01-2019 | 05:32 PM
  #53  
afterburn81's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by wmupilot85
OK, here is some actual facts for people:
  • The most junior captain in IAH is 4/2014. Then there is 4 people from 3/14, 1 person in 2/14, and 1 person 1/14.
  • EWR has 2 people from 10/16 and 4 people from 9/16 as CA.
  • ORD is a 8/13 hire date.
  • CLE is a 1/16 hire date.

These are active employees based off the current seniority list. Swapping is is not a true award. I do expect it to continue to fall with EWR continuing to be the most junior, followed by IAH, CLE, and then ORD. TYS is out of the question since it's so small. The more we hire, the more we can fly, which means the more upgrades we get. I'm not as optimistic that by the end of this year we will see the upgrade award fall to 2 years, but I do fully expect to see upgrades at about 2 years in 2020 sometime.
I happen to know the most junior captain at the company. Just finished OE a few days ago. He is just over 6 years with the company. Not sure where you are going with a 2016 employee being an active captain. The second upgrade class since last year is just starting to do OE.

I did notice there were people showing active on Septembers bid reports that are currently just starting training. I don't know why they show active though. I know a couple of them and they won't be on line until later this year.
Reply
Old 09-02-2019 | 03:36 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
Default

Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
So when you were a new hire the Union launched a campaign intended to stop incoming new hires - and therefore your upward movement? And you were just fine with that?
All of us were new hires at one point. The union is looking out for the greater good. It’s important to keep a unified message to management. United we stand, divided we fall as the saying goes. Management wants a divided group, because then they will win and the abuse and status quo will continue. A unified group will cause them to lose sleep at night. So no matter how much you disagree with gaining leverage in this way, it’s necessary for negotiations.
Reply
Old 09-02-2019 | 06:20 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
All of us were new hires at one point. The union is looking out for the greater good. It’s important to keep a unified message to management. United we stand, divided we fall as the saying goes. Management wants a divided group, because then they will win and the abuse and status quo will continue. A unified group will cause them to lose sleep at night. So no matter how much you disagree with gaining leverage in this way, it’s necessary for negotiations.
It’s not just me. I’ve talked to some very senior pilots who feel like this is a terrible idea. New pilots are necessary for stable schedules and to help with many of the QOL issues we are facing. I’d say the pilot group is split down the middle.

And by the way, I think you have it backwards. It is the MEC who is responsible for representing the collective desire of the pilot group. The pilot group in no way owes support to an MEC who goes this far off the rails.

If the MEC wants a united pilot group he should invest more effort into polls, surveys, etc. which measure the desire of the pilots to take such extreme measures instead of sending out polls asking for ammo for the campaign which has already been decided on.

The MEC better hope his hair-brained idea works. All the company has to do now is just continue to hold out and watch the pilot group divide itself as the MECs actions only continue to worsen the problems for all of us. Then when the MEC comes up for re-election he will find himself in a classroom getting ready to go back to flying.

If the MEC wants to unite us this is not the way to do so.
Reply
Old 09-02-2019 | 06:46 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
It’s not just me. I’ve talked to some very senior pilots who feel like this is a terrible idea. New pilots are necessary for stable schedules and to help with many of the QOL issues we are facing. I’d say the pilot group is split down the middle.

And by the way, I think you have it backwards. It is the MEC who is responsible for representing the collective desire of the pilot group. The pilot group in no way owes support to an MEC who goes this far off the rails.

If the MEC wants a united pilot group he should invest more effort into polls, surveys, etc. which measure the desire of the pilots to take such extreme measures instead of sending out polls asking for ammo for the campaign which has already been decided on.

The MEC better hope his hair-brained idea works. All the company has to do now is just continue to hold out and watch the pilot group divide itself as the MECs actions only continue to worsen the problems for all of us. Then when the MEC comes up for re-election he will find himself in a classroom getting ready to go back to flying.

If the MEC wants to unite us this is not the way to do so.
The MEC isn't a person. No one is going to take you seriously when you sound like an uninformed troll. If new pilots are necessary then the company should do what they need to do to attract new pilots. Go back to your coloring book noob.
Reply
Old 09-02-2019 | 07:54 AM
  #57  
afterburn81's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
It’s not just me. I’ve talked to some very senior pilots who feel like this is a terrible idea.

Wait a sec. You think this is some idea? According to you, you are a relatively new guy. There are approximately 1392 on the list. What percentage of those folks have you accurately sampled for their general take on the reality of the company vs how management wants newhires to see it? Have you interviewed and surveyed at least 51%.

Over the last few years the union has been actively surveying the pilots of XJT. It’s pretty safe to say the union has a better idea of what’s going on than you do.

Not a single post of yours has justified the deceitful tactics you support by management. Please tell us all why you support embellishing and preying on unsuspecting vulnerable new hire pilots for YOUR own benefit. I don’t see what’s in it for them.
Reply
Old 09-02-2019 | 02:02 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Default

I put this on another page and Im going to put it here too.

I do wish our management team would take a cue from United and negotiate in private. United ALPA is doing the same thing. Instead we have a clown at the CEO position running around telling us United isn't happy with our performance.



701EV
Reply
Old 09-02-2019 | 02:16 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
It’s not just me. I’ve talked to some very senior pilots who feel like this is a terrible idea. New pilots are necessary for stable schedules and to help with many of the QOL issues we are facing. I’d say the pilot group is split down the middle.

And by the way, I think you have it backwards. It is the MEC who is responsible for representing the collective desire of the pilot group. The pilot group in no way owes support to an MEC who goes this far off the rails.

If the MEC wants a united pilot group he should invest more effort into polls, surveys, etc. which measure the desire of the pilots to take such extreme measures instead of sending out polls asking for ammo for the campaign which has already been decided on.



The MEC better hope his hair-brained idea works. All the company has to do now is just continue to hold out and watch the pilot group divide itself as the MECs actions only continue to worsen the problems for all of us. Then when the MEC comes up for re-election he will find himself in a classroom getting ready to go back to flying.

If the MEC wants to unite us this is not the way to do so.

DSPS, WOW! In just a few months you have the whole ExpressJet dumpster fire figured out.

You have talked to most of the pilots and YOU know we are a divided group.

The MEC Chairman was just re-elected for another term.

IF YOU ARE A NEW HIRE JUST (like you say you are)WORRY ABOUT DOING YOUR JOB CORRECTLY. GET OFF PROBATION THEN WORRY ABOUT WHAT GOES ON AT HE ADULT TABLE. GOOD LUCK.

701EV
Reply
Old 09-02-2019 | 08:17 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: lav dumper
Default

Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
It’s not just me. I’ve talked to some very senior pilots who feel like this is a terrible idea. New pilots are necessary for stable schedules and to help with many of the QOL issues we are facing. I’d say the pilot group is split down the middle.
The high number of blue lanyards and blue luggage tags speaks volumes. It is way more than down the middle, I'd say about 75% support this movement. Morale is at an all time low, the abuse by the company is unprecedented. At least when mainline skywest owned us the nobody really gave a crap in management because they weren't being pressured by anybody.

Now they are intentionally going out of their way to violate the contract for pilots and FA's, putting letters in files, calling people in the office for excused sick calls, threatening missed trips and CPP failure. This is not the same airline it was a year ago. This new management wants a battle, we'll give them a battle. It's important for new hires to know the facts and hear real line pilot stories. I know I would want to if I were a potential new hire.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UAL T38 Phlyer
United
24
12-28-2023 09:38 PM
jrav8er
Career Questions
10
04-11-2014 04:18 PM
teejay
Flight Schools and Training
11
06-17-2008 10:10 AM
Jessemh
Regional
23
09-21-2007 07:12 PM
Islandhopper
Hiring News
22
08-05-2007 06:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices