Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

175's are done

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2020 | 10:32 PM
  #201  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

There are some really interesting thoughts in this thread. I agree we'll probably never know the real reasons for the 175s going away, but it is frustrating to not know why, especially after such a great effort by so many here to stand up that fleet.

I wanted to add one thing regarding UA making the decision to put in that 49% stake. What are the chances UA mgmt was concerned about certain regional airlines getting so large, with so much market share, that they'd have too much bargaining power? I'd be interested to hear the group's thoughts.

Be well all.
Reply
Old 04-26-2020 | 10:47 PM
  #202  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FNietzsche
There are some really interesting thoughts in this thread. I agree we'll probably never know the real reasons for the 175s going away, but it is frustrating to not know why, especially after such a great effort by so many here to stand up that fleet.

I wanted to add one thing regarding UA making the decision to put in that 49% stake. What are the chances UA mgmt was concerned about certain regional airlines getting so large, with so much market share, that they'd have too much bargaining power? I'd be interested to hear the group's thoughts.

Be well all.
I will say your theory isn’t far fetched. In 2018, RPA wanted to purchase Compass. But TSA, was only willing to sell if RPA bought all 3 (GoJet, TSA, and Compass). They were closing in on a deal when RPAs shareholders (DL, UA, AA) pulled the plug. Rumor had it they did bc they didnt want a regional having that much power and it would take away several companies bidding against each other. I think they would prefer a company go out of business than merger.
Reply
Old 04-27-2020 | 05:36 AM
  #203  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Even if the truth does come out and it will - the white noise that has already been offered as possible explanations will drown out the actual story.
Reply
Old 04-27-2020 | 07:44 AM
  #204  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

My confidence in our new CEO never got established. In hindsight, I will say that his failure to recognize the significance of the attrition due to the merger engineered by a competitor (Skywest) coupled with his failure to see Mesa out-maneuvering him with the next 20 175s has led us to where we are today.

Plenty has been written about the merger and attrition. He inherited that but he never showed an understanding of it until it was too late. We only got the new TA when we had already lost the 175s
As to the 175s, he apparently didn't see JO coming in and off-loading UALs financial burden by offering those next 20 175s instead of UAL having to finance them. I have to give JO credit for what he did. Pretty shrewd move on his part. Unfortunately, it led to what we have now and our CEO didn't see it coming.
Reply
Old 04-27-2020 | 08:37 AM
  #205  
DBono's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Whole lotta sitting
Default

Originally Posted by Southern Fried
My confidence in our new CEO never got established. In hindsight, ............Unfortunately, it led to what we have now and our CEO didn't see it coming.
^^^Exactly^^^
Reply
Old 04-27-2020 | 10:20 AM
  #206  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Southern Fried
My confidence in our new CEO never got established. In hindsight, I will say that his failure to recognize the significance of the attrition due to the merger engineered by a competitor (Skywest) coupled with his failure to see Mesa out-maneuvering him with the next 20 175s has led us to where we are today.

Plenty has been written about the merger and attrition. He inherited that but he never showed an understanding of it until it was too late. We only got the new TA when we had already lost the 175s
As to the 175s, he apparently didn't see JO coming in and off-loading UALs financial burden by offering those next 20 175s instead of UAL having to finance them. I have to give JO credit for what he did. Pretty shrewd move on his part. Unfortunately, it led to what we have now and our CEO didn't see it coming.
I have to wonder if JO can afford those planes now? I think not?
Reply
Old 04-27-2020 | 11:25 AM
  #207  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tilem
I have to wonder if JO can afford those planes now? I think not?
Ultimately it doesn't matter to us. Our 175s are already being transferred to Skywest. We will not be flying them at this point.
Reply
Old 04-27-2020 | 01:52 PM
  #208  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tilem
I have to wonder if JO can afford those planes now? I think not?
The planes have already been purchased and shipment starts in Sep.
Reply
Old 04-28-2020 | 08:02 AM
  #209  
afterburn81's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by XJTFO
Dovic91 - What was wrong with out E175 operations? I saw full flow boards and no cancelled flights. Our CCF was 100% for months. That was a very well written set of paragraphs and some of the stuff makes sense, but not our reliability. I never experienced a cancelled flight out on the line this winter except for one weekend due to weather.
XJT could not staff all 25 E175s. According to communications provided to UA in early February, the last 4 aircraft in the delivery could not be flown. Came up short.

I do believe however, that if UA had known the full extent of how this crisis would develop, they’d have just agreed to leaving them on the ramp at the time. Since that’s essentially where they ended up. I’m assuming that UAs motive was to keep all of them flying without any delay in utilization since the clock was turning on the manufacturer provided support.

Guaranteed OO agreed to fly them but only under the conditions that all 25 were transferred to their network. It was just.....good business.
Reply
Old 04-28-2020 | 08:09 AM
  #210  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
XJT could not staff all 25 E175s. According to communications provided to UA in early February, the last 4 aircraft in the delivery could not be flown. Came up short.
That seems a bit odd since we had a ton of staffing on the 175 new FOs i talked to were barely flying. I know at some points we had to wait on go jet 700s to leave before we could run revenue flights on some of the 175s.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nkweb
Endeavor Air
39
07-10-2018 03:15 PM
satpak77
Envoy Airlines
34
03-31-2016 06:40 AM
jdflyer1999
Envoy Airlines
0
03-11-2015 01:51 PM
JustAMushroom
Envoy Airlines
95
04-30-2014 10:20 AM
norskman2
PSA Airlines
106
12-16-2013 04:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices