Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   ExpressJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/)
-   -   Will ExpressJet survive this? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/128757-will-expressjet-survive.html)

DirkDiggler 05-16-2020 05:02 PM


Originally Posted by EV120 (Post 3057673)
We may be getting set up to fail.
There are 4 SkyWest BOD members who are also on the ExpressJet Inc Board as well

It would be ManaAir LLC, which technically doesn’t even need a board being an LLC. Their control and voting power would be spelled out in the LLC operating agreement. Being private, who really knows who’s calling the shots and the voting power of each LLC member.

Varsity 05-16-2020 05:41 PM


Originally Posted by Flyer1985 (Post 3057564)
Yet envoy is pulling their 145s out of the desert? :scratches head: AA must know something UAL doesn’t.

Envoy is pulling the 145's back into service, but permanently parking 22 E140's that were flown out of Dallas and New York.

These will be replaced with the compass 175's. A net loss of 2 airplanes.

ReadOnly7 05-16-2020 07:20 PM


Originally Posted by Varsity (Post 3057809)
These will be replaced with the compass 175's. A net loss of 2 airplanes.

Those Envoy guys better get their meme game sharpened up!

Redheadtexas 05-16-2020 07:30 PM


Originally Posted by EV120 (Post 3057673)
We may be getting set up to fail.
There are 4 SkyWest BOD members who are also on the ExpressJet Inc Board as well

How do u know this? That sucks.

701EV 05-16-2020 08:06 PM


Originally Posted by EV120 (Post 3057673)
We may be getting set up to fail.
There are 4 SkyWest BOD members who are also on the ExpressJet Inc Board as well

EV120, did something change ? When I last looked it was just 2 BOD members were also on SkyWest's BOD. One is Jerry Atkins.

701EV

HighWingingIt 05-17-2020 01:42 AM


Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 (Post 3057849)
Those Envoy guys better get their meme game sharpened up!


Don’t think they’d be able to match that Compass group when it comes to memes

pangolin 05-17-2020 03:32 AM


Originally Posted by TheOtherGuy25 (Post 3057612)
It is unusual. Unless AA is flooding the market and betting on a quicker recovery than the others so that they will gain a larger market share of passengers who couldn't get flights where they wanted to go with DL/UA during all this madness? No idea though, just spit ballin'

AA is flying 145s on traditionally 76 seat or even mainline routes in June. It’s utterly insane given that the 85 percent cap is causing most flights at this level of service to be full.

watch 05-17-2020 04:17 AM


Originally Posted by pangolin (Post 3057919)
AA is flying 145s on traditionally 76 seat or even mainline routes in June. It’s utterly insane given that the 85 percent cap is causing most flights at this level of service to be full.

AA is trying to be the only option on many routes.

CMT531 05-17-2020 07:42 AM


Originally Posted by watch (Post 3057929)
AA is trying to be the only option on many routes.


It seems to be working too. Buddy of mine said load factors were above 85% on all of his flights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DirkDiggler 05-17-2020 08:07 AM

The only true measure of what's going on is TSA passenger throughput:

https://www.tsa.gov/coronavirus/passenger-throughput
Date 5/16/2020
Total Traveler Throughput Total 193,340
Traveler Throughput
(1 Year Ago - Same Weekday)
2,091,116

NO BUENO. We're all *******ed

boxthrower 05-17-2020 08:39 AM


Originally Posted by CMT531 (Post 3058046)
It seems to be working too. Buddy of mine said load factors were above 85% on all of his flights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


The average load factor with the reduced schedule is now at about 60% out of CLT and DFW. There are multiple flights booked over 85%

ReadOnly7 05-17-2020 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by boxthrower (Post 3058111)
The average load factor with the reduced schedule is now at about 60% out of CLT and DFW. There are multiple flights booked over 85%

load factor on a reduced schedule is just about meaningless when it comes to the airlines’ need for pilots. When you have a high load factor on an anorexic schedule, it DOES help the company reduce cash burn.....but they also don’t need very many pilots to make that happen. Dirk is right....TSA throughput gives you all the perspective you need to understand how big the problem is.

Itsajob 05-17-2020 09:14 AM


Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 (Post 3058120)
load factor on a reduced schedule is just about meaningless when it comes to the airlines’ need for pilots. When you have a high load factor on an anorexic schedule, it DOES help the company reduce cash burn.....but they also don’t need very many pilots to make that happen. Dirk is right....TSA throughput gives you all the perspective you need to understand how big the problem is.

I forget the actual number they gave in the town hall the other day, but it wasn’t that great. We are running a 90% reduced schedule and can’t fill a plane. As states and cities slowly open, our loads will slowly increase as well. It was also mentioned that they are planning on using spare mainline aircraft to increase capacity as things start to recover. Not necessarily adding flights, just putting a bigger plane on the same schedule. The original forecast of demand being down 30% by year end is long gone. They are now predicting (hoping for) loads to only be down 30% by summer 2021. The casualties are going to be high on this downturn.

StuckOnReserve 05-17-2020 11:48 AM

Will ExpressJet survive this?
 

Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 3058142)
I forget the actual number they gave in the town hall the other day, but it wasn’t that great. We are running a 90% reduced schedule and can’t fill a plane. As states and cities slowly open, our loads will slowly increase as well. It was also mentioned that they are planning on using spare mainline aircraft to increase capacity as things start to recover. Not necessarily adding flights, just putting a bigger plane on the same schedule. The original forecast of demand being down 30% by year end is long gone. They are now predicting (hoping for) loads to only be down 30% by summer 2021. The casualties are going to be high on this downturn.


10/1 will be a bloodbath for most of the industry.

However I don’t give their forecasts any credibility. Mgmt is just throwing darts and making wild ass guesses. There hasn’t been an economic event like this before and they having nothing to go on. The forecasts are just worse case scenarios to tell the stock holders, and make some kind of long term plan.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rickair7777 05-17-2020 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by StuckOnReserve (Post 3058268)
10/1 will be a bloodbath for most of the industry.

However I don’t give their forecasts any credibility. Mgmt is just throwing darts and making wild ass guesses. There hasn’t been an economic event like this before and they having nothing to go on. The forecasts are just worse case scenarios to tell the stock holders, and make some kind of long term plan.

There is some precedent, the 1918 pandemic. Difference was the hysteria wasn't as bad back then, but the economic recovery might well be similar, which is a good thing. They never got a vaccine, but we probably will around year-end (sooner with a lot of luck). Good discussion in this article...

https://www.npr.org/2020/05/17/85714...eat-depression

PeakEGT 05-17-2020 04:08 PM

Maybe I’m just “woke,” or some of you home
analysts know better. My question remains if a company like ours get approved for X amount of dollars to cover payroll. Regardless if it covers 75%. It has been set to cover the senior Captains that were displaced. Unless I missed something, this leaves more gov’t cash for payroll that should’ve went to those that were locked in, no?

pangolin 05-18-2020 03:08 AM


Originally Posted by CMT531 (Post 3058046)
It seems to be working too. Buddy of mine said load factors were above 85% on all of his flights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I call bs. Maybe at 85 not above because AA caps at 85 pct.

StuckOnReserve 05-18-2020 06:16 AM

Will ExpressJet survive this?
 

Originally Posted by PeakEGT (Post 3058390)
Maybe I’m just “woke,” or some of you home
analysts know better. My question remains if a company like ours get approved for X amount of dollars to cover payroll. Regardless if it covers 75%. It has been set to cover the senior Captains that were displaced. Unless I missed something, this leaves more gov’t cash for payroll that should’ve went to those that were locked in, no?


CARES$ was enough to cover 75% of payroll for the entire company (pilots, FA’s, MX, Admin) May-September not just pilots. With the downgrades taking place there is probably more cash to cover a higher percentage of the whole company through 9/30.

CARES act only stated maintain employment levels through 9/30. There is open interpretation of what that meant. Since the White House is only concerned about unemployment stats, not underemployment stats the Treasury could probably care less if we we’re all downgraded to janitors, as long as we aren’t filing for unemployment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

watch 05-20-2020 04:37 AM

Why hasn't Expressjet offered early retirements or reduced pay leaves? Lots of folks getting their min guarantee and most of the reserve list has 0 credit for the month to date.

Is a lack of creative cost saving measures an indication that they're planning to fold?

I wonder what are likely precursors to the company sending an email saying they're closed at the end of he month, like TSA and Compass. XJT doesn't really have assets, right?

falconkidding 05-20-2020 04:52 AM


Originally Posted by watch (Post 3060222)
Why hasn't Expressjet offered early retirements or reduced pay leaves? Lots of folks getting their min guarantee and most of the reserve list has 0 credit for the month to date.

Is a lack of creative cost saving measures an indication that they're planning to fold?

I wonder what are likely precursors to the company sending an email saying they're closed at the end of he month, like TSA and Compass. XJT doesn't really have assets, right?

They have 40hour lines and no fly lines. I think if you dont see the latest bid rolled back somewhat in the next few months that would be a sign they are going under. You cant support the operation with 300 pilots.

DirkDiggler 05-20-2020 05:30 AM


Originally Posted by falconkidding (Post 3060229)
They have 40hour lines and no fly lines. I think if you dont see the latest bid rolled back somewhat in the next few months that would be a sign they are going under. You cant support the operation with 300 pilots.

I've said it before on here. We have all these facilities, hangers, buildings etc. Our infrastructure isn't small and efficient to scale down to only a few hundred pilots. Not only that, but the pilots that are going to be left are all top of the payscale in either seat, with 4 weeks vacation each, highest 401k match and defined contribution amounts. All of these factors lead to the perfect storm for the ultimate demise of XJT. I hate to say it but somebody has to inject some reality into these forums. That is unless a miracle happens.

Look at the graph on this site, if history repeats itself and there is another wave like with the Spanish flu, we are all done for. XJT or not. The first round was just a teaser. https://www.coastalreview.org/2020/0...y-be-deadlier/

LoneStar32 05-20-2020 07:09 AM

lol, if I had a nickle for every time somebody posted that stupid fear mongering Spanish flu graph since March... What that graph doesn't take into account is a century advancement on living conditions, sanitation, and medicine.

DirkDiggler 05-20-2020 07:18 AM

While all of that’s true, human behavior doesn’t change. People let their guard down, start putting their fingers in their mouths again etc. With that logic the flu would’ve been eradicated long ago. HIV too, but people just can’t resist banging hookers without a jimmy lol

Redheadtexas 05-20-2020 02:12 PM


Originally Posted by StuckOnReserve (Post 3058686)
CARES$ was enough to cover 75% of payroll for the entire company (pilots, FA’s, MX, Admin) May-September not just pilots. With the downgrades taking place there is probably more cash to cover a higher percentage of the whole company through 9/30.

CARES act only stated maintain employment levels through 9/30. There is open interpretation of what that meant. Since the White House is only concerned about unemployment stats, not underemployment stats the Treasury could probably care less if we we’re all downgraded to janitors, as long as we aren’t filing for unemployment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everyone in ATL needs to be downgraded to janitor. ;)

boeingdvr 05-21-2020 04:10 AM


Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 (Post 3058120)
load factor on a reduced schedule is just about meaningless when it comes to the airlines’ need for pilots. When you have a high load factor on an anorexic schedule, it DOES help the company reduce cash burn.....but they also don’t need very many pilots to make that happen. Dirk is right....TSA throughput gives you all the perspective you need to understand how big the problem is.


Load factor at 100% !! Easy to do with one flight a day operating, that doesn’t keep the lights on however.

Claxstarr 05-24-2020 10:52 AM


Originally Posted by boeingdvr (Post 3060977)
Load factor at 100% !! Easy to do with one flight a day operating, that doesn’t keep the lights on however.


^ this

People need to think deeper than a single load factor of TSA pass through percentage.
Think. Bigger. Picture.

Critical thinking is a good thing.

flynd94 05-24-2020 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by Claxstarr (Post 3063109)
^ this

People need to think deeper than a single load factor of TSA pass through percentage.
Think. Bigger. Picture.

Critical thinking is a good thing.

ok, here’s my counter. My flights A319/320 have upgraded to 739/753. I flew an added SFO turn. My next couple of flights were originally RJ’s and are now on A320’s booked over 100 each. We have more flights popping into open time. 2 weeks ago we had 15 flights per day in EWR. Now we are knocking 30 a day. SK stated that July will be planned at 25% instead of 10%.

UnitedExpress 05-24-2020 09:36 PM


Originally Posted by flynd94 (Post 3063234)
ok, here’s my counter. My flights A319/320 have upgraded to 739/753. I flew an added SFO turn. My next couple of flights were originally RJ’s and are now on A320’s booked over 100 each. We have more flights popping into open time. 2 weeks ago we had 15 flights per day in EWR. Now we are knocking 30 a day. SK stated that July will be planned at 25% instead of 10%.

That’s something positive. Hopefully the PAX numbers and demand continues to climb.

Delsol 05-24-2020 11:14 PM


Originally Posted by flynd94 (Post 3063234)
ok, here’s my counter. My flights A319/320 have upgraded to 739/753. I flew an added SFO turn. My next couple of flights were originally RJ’s and are now on A320’s booked over 100 each. We have more flights popping into open time. 2 weeks ago we had 15 flights per day in EWR. Now we are knocking 30 a day. SK stated that July will be planned at 25% instead of 10%.

A trajectory of +15%/month would be fantastic. Let's hope this continues. ORD was a zoo this weekend, long lines for the few restaurants that were open.

pangolin 05-25-2020 04:22 AM


Originally Posted by Delsol (Post 3063472)
A trajectory of +15%/month would be fantastic. Let's hope this continues. ORD was a zoo this weekend, long lines for the few restaurants that were open.

It’s uneven which I am sure is challenging but I’m hopeful. Some states have more activity than others.

Itsajob 05-25-2020 06:04 AM


Originally Posted by pangolin (Post 3063505)
It’s uneven which I am sure is challenging but I’m hopeful. Some states have more activity than others.

That’s what is making the recovery difficult and fueling the inability to accurately forecast how we come out of this. Some states are mostly open, some partial, and some not. Major markets such as New York and California are being more cautious than others. Until there is a vaccine or at least a reliable treatment, things will be extremely slow. Also, many would like to travel, but don’t want to have to deal with the hassle of booking flights on reduced schedules, wearing a mask on the plane, or getting to a destination where restrictions are in place. I know that I wouldn’t travel right now. It has nothing to do with exposure to the virus, it is because it all sounds like a pain in the butt. The big displacement at United just closed. There should be a couple of clean up bids released starting this week. That should start to give people an idea of how things are going to shake out. They will announce the size of the initial furlough for United pilots, and the regionals should find out how much their flying will be reduced as well. Good times.

boeingdvr 05-25-2020 12:15 PM


Originally Posted by flynd94 (Post 3063234)
ok, here’s my counter. My flights A319/320 have upgraded to 739/753. I flew an added SFO turn. My next couple of flights were originally RJ’s and are now on A320’s booked over 100 each. We have more flights popping into open time. 2 weeks ago we had 15 flights per day in EWR. Now we are knocking 30 a day. SK stated that July will be planned at 25% instead of 10%.

Counter- NK,F9,SWA, Will offer Uber cheap fares to really put the pressure on the legacies. Their profit margins will suffer.

This is a industry changing event for the next decade -

rickair7777 05-25-2020 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by boeingdvr (Post 3063793)
Counter- NK,F9,SWA, Will offer Uber cheap fares to really put the pressure on the legacies. Their profit margins will suffer.

This is a industry changing event for the next decade -

Not as industry changing as you might think.

What do the legacies do?

1. International.
2. Regional service to small towns that ULCCs either don't touch, or have very poor frequency.

Those two key service paradigms seem to survive every downturn and game-changing industry event. ULCCs won't be replacing that.

texaspropguy 05-27-2020 09:05 AM


Originally Posted by flynd94 (Post 3063234)
ok, here’s my counter. My flights A319/320 have upgraded to 739/753. I flew an added SFO turn. My next couple of flights were originally RJ’s and are now on A320’s booked over 100 each. We have more flights popping into open time. 2 weeks ago we had 15 flights per day in EWR. Now we are knocking 30 a day. SK stated that July will be planned at 25% instead of 10%.

This is exactly what SK said the plan was going to be. Not increased frequency, but putting bigger planes on the same frequency until demand improves sufficiently.

Ben Kenobi 05-27-2020 10:45 AM

Hahahaha. No,...no. XJT will not survive.

DirkDiggler 05-28-2020 05:23 AM


Originally Posted by Ben Kenobi (Post 3065090)
Hahahaha. No,...no. XJT will not survive.

That's awesome, after 64 pages somebody actually answered the question.

StuckOnReserve 05-28-2020 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by DirkDiggler (Post 3065414)
That's awesome, after 64 pages somebody actually answered the question.


This is APC what else did you expect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DirkDiggler 05-28-2020 01:08 PM

We’ve reached the conclusion....NO.
Time to close the thread LOL

texaspropguy 05-28-2020 02:13 PM


Originally Posted by Ben Kenobi (Post 3065090)
Hahahaha. No,...no. XJT will not survive.

Thank you Obi Wan, there is no hope.

TheOtherGuy25 05-28-2020 02:17 PM

1 Attachment(s)
The Simpsons said it best...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands