Originally Posted by TFAYD (Post 3096287)

there is NO requirement to pull any 70/76 seaters. The only requirement affecting that fleet is to pull 6 seats from the 76 seaters if furloughs are going deeper at UA.

The only cap relative to mainline flying is on total UAX hulls. So they can pull either 50 seater or 70/76 seater.

my money is on UA keeping the large RJs

Originally Posted by tonsterboy5 (Post 3096294)

after 153 76/70 seaters the number is tied to to NB planes. That is why they will have to pull.

Originally Posted by TFAYD (Post 3096304)

No - google United pilot agreement, read

1-C-1-a-(2) and report back

Originally Posted by sigler (Post 3096310)

Did you read 1-C-1-f and g?

Originally Posted by TFAYD (Post 3096314)

That is mostly in relation to a NEW small NB aircraft, ie E195 or A220

the limitation in 1-C-1-f is likely not gonna matter as 76 seat block hours can be 120% of NB block hours.

Originally Posted by sigler (Post 3096494)

You seem to know a lot more about scope than me, so I’ll take your word for it. I still don’t see all 50-seaters going away, question is who will fly them.

Originally Posted by amcnd (Post 3096497)

i see most “CPA” 50 seaters going away.... Prorate 50 seaters will grow..

Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3096517)

Could be.

Not under scope, but it expands the mainline brand, service fotprint, and some revenue. Kind of a win-win.

Originally Posted by TFAYD (Post 3096521)

all UAX flying falls under scope - EAS/pro-rate or not doesn’t matter. As long as it is marketed under UAX it is subject to scope.