![]() |
Waiting for the next Cares Act to require scope waivers to bring equipment size into line with the real revenue market.
|
Originally Posted by Spoiler
(Post 3096769)
Waiting for the next Cares Act to require scope waivers to bring equipment size into line with the real revenue market.
|
Originally Posted by Spoiler
(Post 3096769)
Waiting for the next Cares Act to require scope waivers to bring equipment size into line with the real revenue market.
|
Originally Posted by Spoiler
(Post 3096769)
Waiting for the next Cares Act to require scope waivers to bring equipment size into line with the real revenue market.
|
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 3096810)
The senate republican's can't agree on how to spell CARES let alone on any legislation of any kind for relief. Simple extension would buy time to decide - they do not want to extend the 600.00 per week unemployment bonus because it discourages working. Seriously - where are people going to work anyway! It's infused directly into the economy and that's why we have not seem WORSE happening. Take that away and the people won't blame the democrats. The senate is as short sighted as an airline.
|
Originally Posted by flyguy23
(Post 3096855)
I'm going to take a shot in the dark and guess you're a democrat...
The senate is republican controlled. Yet they can’t agree on ANY plan. CARES was agreed to the first time. What changed? |
I have family members who are perfectly capable of working, but are making more money sitting at home because of the additional unemployment. That’s why they don’t want it extended, it incentivizes not working.
Back to our topic, I received the WARN/Furlough notice via certified mail yesterday. I’m still wondering if there are any pilots who didn’t receive a letter saying their position would be eliminated on October 1. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
(Post 3096762)
Im at an ACMI carrier and last Fall this Skywest guy gave me his card and said “we’re hiring.”
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
(Post 3096762)
Yeah, I want to leave a 6 figure job traveling the globe for a $40k rj job and being brainwashed that SKW is a “mainline” carrier.
|
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 3096539)
no - that is not correct. All flying under the UAX banner is subject to scope.
And btw, the point of pro-rate flying is not the fare from SGU to SLC or from PAH to ORD which is indeed set by OO. What makes pro-rate flying viable is the connection fee that OO gets from UA for say PAH - ORD - SFO. Yes, UA pays a commission for that incremental leg that they sell because of feed. Without that neither OO would do any pro-rate and neither would UA endorse any pro-rate. Somebody didn’t think that through. |
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
(Post 3096762)
Im at an ACMI carrier and last Fall this Skywest guy gave me his card and said “we’re hiring.”
Yeah, I want to leave a 6 figure job traveling the globe for a $40k rj job and being brainwashed that SKW is a “mainline” carrier. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands