Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > ExpressJet
ExpressJet requesting leave of absences? >

ExpressJet requesting leave of absences?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

ExpressJet requesting leave of absences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2008 | 04:00 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Default

How long was this before all the deleted posts?
Old 03-09-2008 | 04:57 PM
  #82  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 130
Default

If it hasn't been said yet, folks should know RAH offered COLAs at Chautauqua in the fall of 2005.

The sky isn't falling...YET.
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:01 PM
  #83  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by reelbigchair
The reason RAH got CAL flying may be they are cheaper than XJet, but the MAIN reason it didn't stay at XJet is because they want to diversify their routes among many carriers.
I can assure you it was because they were cheaper.

I'm not saying RAH guys are bad, I'm just saying don't try and act like taking our flying was just the "name of the game". It is hurting a better paid pilot group. Get over yourself. If I was in your shoes I would not be defending XJT loss to RAH at all.

All this will lead to is XJT maybe having to take consesions and taking someone else's flying, because we now have less block hours for our pilot staff. Now do you see how bad this can get?

I only hope we take Mesa's flying out of IAD and ORD, because, that sir would be a step in the right direction. Not like XJT flying going to RAH. We can all cheer if that happens.
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:03 PM
  #84  
G-Dog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: ERJ 170
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit
Do you know why RAH got XJT flying? It is because they have a cheaper operation. How much do your FO's get paid over there? How much do their FO's get paid on the 170? We have a more costly contract than RAH does, don't tell us they didn't cost CAL less.

Why don't you compare a 5-year 170 FO at RAH to a 5 year DC-9 FO at NW.
You are not educated. First of all, those rates were negotiated when 175s where not even a thought. Get over yourself. If you are and X-Jet employee, you giving your co-workers a bad name.
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:06 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G-Dog
You are not educated. First of all, those rates were negotiated when 175s where not even a thought. Get over yourself. If you are and X-Jet employee, you giving your co-workers a bad name.
Get over myself, how about you get over yourself? You give the guys at RAH a bad name. Employees at XJT are losing flying because of our hard fought and really good pay contract (in terms of other regionals). Don't give me gripe sir, the only uneducated person is you.

Last I checked we negotiate when we get new aircraft. Not fly bigger ones at old rates
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:15 PM
  #86  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 130
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit
Get over myself, how about you get over yourself? You give the guys at RAH a bad name. Employees at XJT are losing flying because of our hard fought and really good pay contract (in terms of other regionals). Don't give me gripe sir, the only uneducated person is you.

Last I checked we negotiate when we get new aircraft. Not fly bigger ones at old rates
I don't work for either RAH or XJT, but as an observer with no dog in the fight I can tell you for a FACT that you are terribly misinformed about why things are happening the way they are at either company.

Do you know the circumstances surrounding the CHQ 2003 CBA? Do you know what the CHQ contract looked like before it? Do you know how big the company was then, vs. how it is now?

Until you know the answers to the questions above, you will be terribly misinformed on the topic.

You aren't losing flying because of your pilot contract, you're losing flying because mother CAL wanted to diversify their regional feed at the first possible moment...
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:18 PM
  #87  
HookEm's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: 170 FO
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit
Get over myself, how about you get over yourself?

This is CLASSIC... talk about uneducated. I don't see your co-workers chiming in to defend your poor arguments.

I hope that is because you are swimming in XJET's kool aid hiring pool, quit crying
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:20 PM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I don't work for either RAH or XJT
right there, you have no valid points here.
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:21 PM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HookEm
This is CLASSIC... talk about uneducated. I don't see your co-workers chiming in to defend your poor arguments.

I hope that is because you are swimming in XJET's kool aid hiring pool, quit crying
Fine, rejoice that XJT is losing its flying to a cheaper regional!! This is great news for all us pilots!!!!
Old 03-09-2008 | 05:23 PM
  #90  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

It had nothing to do with pilot contracts and everything to do with CAL wanting to diversify so XJT didn't have a strong arm on CAL. It sucks but thats what happened.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying
Military
0
02-24-2008 07:48 AM
Nevets
ExpressJet
6
01-15-2008 04:21 AM
Nevets
ExpressJet
44
12-17-2007 09:37 AM
JoeyMeatballs
ExpressJet
47
10-25-2007 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices