![]() |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3497923)
And since the MEC hasn’t mandated a change in direction, then we must conclude they are good with current proceedings. That begs the question, are WE good with current proceedings? It's nearing the end of September, we're 16 months into negotiations that should have taken 6, we're almost a year past the amendable date, and we have one whole informational picketing event under our belt, a refusal to participate in ALPA-wide picketing, and a possible "surprise" picketing event planned next week. Meanwhile, every month, more and more of our brother and sister pilots are forced to retire with a 1998 pension. It's embarrassing. In my opinion, we should NOT be satisfied with the pace of the negotiations, and we should be much more active in demonstrating that dissatisfaction and our resolve to conclude negotiations with a TA that meets and exceeds our limited negotiations goals. We did not narrow the focus of this CBA campaign so we could drag out the process over multiple years and multiple peaks, but that's where we are headed right now unless we start doing something different. FXLAX, earlier in another thread you responded to a remark about "comments of one person" who recently took the reins of FedEx:
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3497914)
Originally Posted by busdriver12
(Post 3497680)
It's interesting to me, the stock markets reaction to the comments of one person, someone who just took the reins of FedEx recently. And obviously has so little sense that he approves a massive dividend increase a few months ago, says they're still going to do a billion plus in stock buybacks, though the global economy is going into recession. Does this sound like someone who understands what is going on? . |
TA???? Rumors???
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 3497980)
So, we agree on that point.
That begs the question, are WE good with current proceedings? It's nearing the end of September, we're 16 months into negotiations that should have taken 6, we're almost a year past the amendable date, and we have one whole informational picketing event under our belt, a refusal to participate in ALPA-wide picketing, and a possible "surprise" picketing event planned next week. Meanwhile, every month, more and more of our brother and sister pilots are forced to retire with a 1998 pension. It's embarrassing. In my opinion, we should NOT be satisfied with the pace of the negotiations, and we should be much more active in demonstrating that dissatisfaction and our resolve to conclude negotiations with a TA that meets and exceeds our limited negotiations goals. We did not narrow the focus of this CBA campaign so we could drag out the process over multiple years and multiple peaks, but that's where we are headed right now unless we start doing something different. FXLAX, earlier in another thread you responded to a remark about "comments of one person" who recently took the reins of FedEx: . I feel my comments on both “boards” are congruent. They do (or not do) exactly what their members want. Whether we agree on what they do or not do, is perfectly fine to disagree on. But to say they aren’t doing anything is false. The lack of change in direction is action in keeping status quo. As soon as they decide they don’t like the direction, it will change. And maybe we will disagree on the manner they changed (not what changed) and how they communicate it to us. But that is different than saying they are not doing exactly what they want. |
Contract Negotiating Grid
It looks like the most recent negotiation sessions have been updated with “Company Term Sheet” and “ALPA Term Sheet”. Could someone please fill me in on what this might mean?
|
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3499461)
It looks like the most recent negotiation sessions have been updated with “Company Term Sheet” and “ALPA Term Sheet”. Could someone please fill me in on what this might mean?
“Term Sheet: Often a bullet-point document listing the most important concepts of a proposal. Often proposals are passed and countered working off of the same document, where concepts that are agreed to are noted as such and counterproposals are shown by adding another column or by making redlined changes to the proposal. Bargaining using term sheets keeps the parties focused on the key concepts at issue and avoids negotiations bogging down in the details of actual contract language.” In our case I would say it’s all the money items left into one proposal. https://www.alpa.org/ala/-/media/ALA...sary.pdf?la=en |
Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
(Post 3499482)
Google Says Union Term Sheet is:
“Term Sheet: Often a bullet-point document listing the most important concepts of a proposal. Often proposals are passed and countered working off of the same document, where concepts that are agreed to are noted as such and counterproposals are shown by adding another column or by making redlined changes to the proposal. Bargaining using term sheets keeps the parties focused on the key concepts at issue and avoids negotiations bogging down in the details of actual contract language.” In our case I would say it’s all the money items left into one proposal. https://www.alpa.org/ala/-/media/ALA...sary.pdf?la=en |
Originally Posted by Tuck
(Post 3499505)
Exactly. In this specific limited focus negotiations it's probably all the items that really matter. All of the sections that are TA'd probably amount to about equal give from both parties - so a net cost close to zero. But now we are in the area where ALPA alone stands to gain and it will cost the Company. We'll see what happens. Believe today was the last day of all scheduled negotiations. I expect we will hear something soon.
|
Originally Posted by The Walrus
(Post 3497939)
I think they met in a parking lot .
Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
(Post 3497969)
:D That was funny!! Honestly, who cares where they meet, as long as we get a great contract.
Originally Posted by kwri10s
(Post 3497979)
And that's how we know you don't work here.
|
Originally Posted by Tuck
(Post 3499505)
Believe today was the last day of all scheduled negotiations. I expect we will hear something soon.
If you were correct about the last scheduled day, the silence is defining. We wouldn't know if it was the last day since the added dates weren't published. But hey, we are use to the secrets by this point. You would think that the MEC would want to get a message out considering they wanted us to keep the second half of the month available for the picketing event that had a secret date. |
Originally Posted by pinseeker
(Post 3500385)
If you were correct about the last scheduled day, the silence is defining. We wouldn't know if it was the last day since the added dates weren't published. But hey, we are use to the secrets by this point. You would think that the MEC would want to get a message out considering they wanted us to keep the second half of the month available for the picketing event that had a secret date.
I came from another legacy carrier based in Atlanta and the communication has been less than ideal here from ALPA. How do they create unity if we’re not getting emails that tell us what’s going on. Even if it’s a no update, update, send it. Let us know when the NC is meeting with the company etc… |
Originally Posted by 170driver
(Post 3500396)
I came from another legacy carrier based in Atlanta and the communication has been less than ideal here from ALPA. How do they create unity if we’re not getting emails that tell us what’s going on. Even if it’s a no update, update, send it. Let us know when the NC is meeting with the company etc…
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands