Deviation bank
07-30-2022 | 06:09 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 916
Likes: 2
Deviation bank
Mid trip deviations are being denied when upgrading a ticket from Biz to FC because the FC fare is beyond an arbitrary, made up percentage limit by management. Really?
After dealing with a couple years of lockdowns, lengthy immigration procedures, company jumpseating, swabbings, immunization politics, hotel isolation, room service menus, etc., you would think that we should be able to spend our enormous deviation banks on a simple upgrade to FC. Pathetic.
After dealing with a couple years of lockdowns, lengthy immigration procedures, company jumpseating, swabbings, immunization politics, hotel isolation, room service menus, etc., you would think that we should be able to spend our enormous deviation banks on a simple upgrade to FC. Pathetic.
07-31-2022 | 05:47 PM
#4
Banned
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
The contract has language pertaining to mid trip DHD’s/deviation. It requires Chief Pilot (or his designees) approval. Seems like this would allow them to place restrictions on it due to it needing approval.
Status quo defined by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), status quo refers to existing pay, rules, and actual, objective working conditions and practices which were in effect prior to the time a major dispute arises.
It sucks, but not sure it is a contract violation. Most are happy to continue the stalled process we are in it appears. All or most trips getting covered. Must be minimal frustration within our ranks
Status quo defined by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), status quo refers to existing pay, rules, and actual, objective working conditions and practices which were in effect prior to the time a major dispute arises.
It sucks, but not sure it is a contract violation. Most are happy to continue the stalled process we are in it appears. All or most trips getting covered. Must be minimal frustration within our ranks
07-31-2022 | 09:03 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
The contract has language pertaining to mid trip DHD’s/deviation. It requires Chief Pilot (or his designees) approval. Seems like this would allow them to place restrictions on it due to it needing approval.
Status quo defined by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), status quo refers to existing pay, rules, and actual, objective working conditions and practices which were in effect prior to the time a major dispute arises.
It sucks, but not sure it is a contract violation. Most are happy to continue the stalled process we are in it appears. All or most trips getting covered. Must be minimal frustration within our ranks
Status quo defined by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), status quo refers to existing pay, rules, and actual, objective working conditions and practices which were in effect prior to the time a major dispute arises.
It sucks, but not sure it is a contract violation. Most are happy to continue the stalled process we are in it appears. All or most trips getting covered. Must be minimal frustration within our ranks
You did write practices. So does past practice count or not?
07-31-2022 | 10:44 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
The contract has language pertaining to mid trip DHD’s/deviation. It requires Chief Pilot (or his designees) approval. Seems like this would allow them to place restrictions on it due to it needing approval.
Status quo defined by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), status quo refers to existing pay, rules, and actual, objective working conditions and practices which were in effect prior to the time a major dispute arises.
It sucks, but not sure it is a contract violation. Most are happy to continue the stalled process we are in it appears. All or most trips getting covered. Must be minimal frustration within our ranks
Status quo defined by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), status quo refers to existing pay, rules, and actual, objective working conditions and practices which were in effect prior to the time a major dispute arises.
It sucks, but not sure it is a contract violation. Most are happy to continue the stalled process we are in it appears. All or most trips getting covered. Must be minimal frustration within our ranks
Yet the company can violate the status quo any time by changing deviation bank rules and the union just lets them do it even though its an easy suit to win...
08-01-2022 | 04:35 AM
#7
Banned
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Its not violating status quo to change an amount when the contract says you can. They have previously placed restrictions on mid trip deviations also. The contract gives them that rite since it requires permission.
Choosing to not do draft/ava is also not a violation of status quo since the contract gives you that choice. A simple google search will turn up some good info on this topic.
Choosing to not do draft/ava is also not a violation of status quo since the contract gives you that choice. A simple google search will turn up some good info on this topic.
08-01-2022 | 09:41 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
Its not violating status quo to change an amount when the contract says you can. They have previously placed restrictions on mid trip deviations also. The contract gives them that rite since it requires permission.
Choosing to not do draft/ava is also not a violation of status quo since the contract gives you that choice. A simple google search will turn up some good info on this topic.
Choosing to not do draft/ava is also not a violation of status quo since the contract gives you that choice. A simple google search will turn up some good info on this topic.
Yes but when there is a practice that is then changed during negotiations, how does that work? Just as there is a practice of a certain amount of open trips picked up, if that practice changes dramatically, it can be a change of status quo, right?
08-01-2022 | 02:52 PM
#9
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 719
Likes: 24
From: 767 CA
Just ask the guys/gals at Spirit about their TRO in 2017.
08-01-2022 | 03:40 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Its not violating status quo to change an amount when the contract says you can. They have previously placed restrictions on mid trip deviations also. The contract gives them that rite since it requires permission.
Choosing to not do draft/ava is also not a violation of status quo since the contract gives you that choice. A simple google search will turn up some good info on this topic.
Choosing to not do draft/ava is also not a violation of status quo since the contract gives you that choice. A simple google search will turn up some good info on this topic.
Choosing not to do draft/ava is not a violation of status quo, but encouraging others not too or lambasting those that do can get you in trouble for status quo violations and harassment respectively.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
