Search
Notices

Deviation bank

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2022, 07:05 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Previously one could buy a first class ticket without doing a mid trip deviation and the expense report people would not care. Now they care. That is a status quo violation. The contract only gives them the right to change the approvals of mid trip deviation amounts but does not give them the right to change the status quo of no longer allowing people to upgrade to first outside of getting mid trip deviation approval.

Choosing not to do draft/ava is not a violation of status quo, but encouraging others not too or lambasting those that do can get you in trouble for status quo violations and harassment respectively.
What you say is right on target. And this is going to nail a lot of people for a lot of money. Is there an organized effort to grieve this yet? One problem is the failure by the expense report folks to close expense reports in a timely manner. No one really knows how badly they are going to get nailed because many have 6 months worth of expense reports remaining open.
Rock is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 03:43 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Previously one could buy a first class ticket without doing a mid trip deviation and the expense report people would not care. Now they care. That is a status quo violation. The contract only gives them the right to change the approvals of mid trip deviation amounts but does not give them the right to change the status quo of no longer allowing people to upgrade to first outside of getting mid trip deviation approval.

Choosing not to do draft/ava is not a violation of status quo, but encouraging others not too or lambasting those that do can get you in trouble for status quo violations and harassment respectively.
How is that a status quo violation. If you did not get approval for a mid-trip deviation, yet purchased a ticket different than the scheduled flight, you didn't have approval to purchase that ticket. The contract states that you must get approval for a mid-trip deviation. They are simply following the language of the contract. If you can prove that the only reason that this has changed is because we are in section six negotiations for the purpose of putting pressure on the pilots, then it would be a status quo violation. Just like not picking up trips or draft by itself isn't a status quo violation. Per the contract, it is an individual decision. If you chose not to fly any additional trips, that is your choice. If the company can prove there was a coordinated effort to influence pilots not to fly extra trips in order to put pressure on the company during negotiations, then it becomes a status quo violation.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 08:39 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold View Post
Just ask the guys/gals at Spirit about their TRO in 2017.

Xactly! One way street…
FXLAX is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 08:44 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
How is that a status quo violation. If you did not get approval for a mid-trip deviation, yet purchased a ticket different than the scheduled flight, you didn't have approval to purchase that ticket. The contract states that you must get approval for a mid-trip deviation. They are simply following the language of the contract. If you can prove that the only reason that this has changed is because we are in section six negotiations for the purpose of putting pressure on the pilots, then it would be a status quo violation. Just like not picking up trips or draft by itself isn't a status quo violation. Per the contract, it is an individual decision. If you chose not to fly any additional trips, that is your choice. If the company can prove there was a coordinated effort to influence pilots not to fly extra trips in order to put pressure on the company during negotiations, then it becomes a status quo violation.

It doesn’t sound like he said he deviated from the scheduled flight, only that he upgraded his seat. If so, that doesn’t sound like a deviation. What has been past practice with this? If they’ve never disallowed it before, then that seems like some kind of retaliation? Doesn’t even have to do with section 6, necessarily.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 08:54 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
It doesn’t sound like he said he deviated from the scheduled flight, only that he upgraded his seat. If so, that doesn’t sound like a deviation. What has been past practice with this? If they’ve never disallowed it before, then that seems like some kind of retaliation? Doesn’t even have to do with section 6, necessarily.
Well, you can't just upgrade your seat with deviation bank money either. There is a form to fill out for an upgrade request and you have to pay the difference in the upgrade yourself. So again, where is the violation?
pinseeker is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 09:03 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
Well, you can't just upgrade your seat with deviation bank money either. There is a form to fill out for an upgrade request and you have to pay the difference in the upgrade yourself. So again, where is the violation?
For at least the last four years you haven’t needed to do any of that to change a scheduled business class seat to first class on a scheduled deadhead. Never even questioned. Always approved. Years ago when I asked permission to do it I was told it wasn’t necessary if I was still flying the scheduled flight. So I quit asking. No problems. I can say as a matter of fact that was the case less than a year ago.
Rock is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 09:12 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
For at least the last four years you haven’t needed to do any of that to change a scheduled business class seat to first class on a scheduled deadhead. Never even questioned. Always approved. Years ago when I asked permission to do it I was told it wasn’t necessary if I was still flying the scheduled flight. So I quit asking. No problems. I can say as a matter of fact that was the case less than a year ago.
Can you provide the contract reference that says you are allowed to do that? Do you still have the email that said you were allowed to do that without approval?
pinseeker is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 10:17 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
Can you provide the contract reference that says you are allowed to do that? Do you still have the email that said you were allowed to do that without approval?
Can you provide the contract reference that says you have 30 minutes to refuse a RAT trip after notification? Some things exist in our FedEx lives that are done based on past precedent. “Agreements” that aren’t codified by the CBA but accepted. If every single thing we did on a daily basis had a contractual reference the contract would be more unmanageable than it already is. If I were the only person moving themselves from business class to first class on a scheduled mid trip deadhead without deviating, I’d slap my own hand and learn a tough lesson. After a couple decades at FedEx, I’ve got a pretty good handle on daily ops. Do you think ALPA published recent warnings about this because one or two guys recently decided to try something new? Or is it because the company changed how it does things and now a bunch of guys are getting bit in the ass?
Rock is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 12:13 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
Can you provide the contract reference that says you have 30 minutes to refuse a RAT trip after notification? Some things exist in our FedEx lives that are done based on past precedent. “Agreements” that aren’t codified by the CBA but accepted. If every single thing we did on a daily basis had a contractual reference the contract would be more unmanageable than it already is. If I were the only person moving themselves from business class to first class on a scheduled mid trip deadhead without deviating, I’d slap my own hand and learn a tough lesson. After a couple decades at FedEx, I’ve got a pretty good handle on daily ops. Do you think ALPA published recent warnings about this because one or two guys recently decided to try something new? Or is it because the company changed how it does things and now a bunch of guys are getting bit in the ass?
To answer your first question, try section 25.H.6. Since I don't know the details, giving you 30 minutes to decide could be doing you a favor. The issues we are talking about are codified by the CBA. There is a section on higher class of service eligibility as well as mid trip deviations. I asked if you had written documentation saying you could do this without approval to help. However, if there isn't anything documented stating that the company said that you could do this, then the CBA is the default. I flew international for a very long time and never heard of anyone upgrading a deadhead ticket without having to pay the difference themselves. Again, there is a form for that. My guess is it did happen some in the past, but went under the radar. Then a lot of guys started doing it and it got someones attention. They then informed the expense report audit people of the error, and now it is an issue.

If pilots really feel that they are getting screwed, they should grieve it. The union doesn't have to agree to grieve it, you can do it on your own. Again, unless there is something in the CBA or other written documentation stating that you can use deviation bank money to upgrade a scheduled deadhead ticket to a higher class of service than is required, then I think it is a losing case. JMO.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 08-02-2022, 01:23 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FedEx Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Position: RFO
Posts: 118
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
Can you provide the contract reference that says you are allowed to do that? Do you still have the email that said you were allowed to do that without approval?
8.A.5. Higher class is authorized. They may only be required to book you in biz due to it having a lie flat seat, but FC is authorized if that aircraft offers it.
FedEx Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
orvil
FedEx
79
09-17-2017 04:13 PM
bluesky7
FedEx
34
12-11-2016 08:15 AM
UnusualAttitude
FedEx
1
08-16-2016 11:50 AM
Whale Pilot
Cargo
6
08-25-2012 05:16 AM
Lakeside
Cargo
11
03-03-2012 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices