Search

Notices

A Simple Reminder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2023 | 04:35 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 864
Likes: 50
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446
Emmerson Biggs. Spot on.

Finally a sane post. I said it before, we had leverage the last two years when we had record loads but guys had to keep flying overtime. The inherent greed was amazing. And, here we are now with guys complaining that the contract may not meet their expectations. We should have given our union and the NC the tools and leverage as soon as the last contract expired. But, we had guys who put themselves first and banked the bucks. Its disappointing to see so many contracts where we could have gotten more but not enough pilots cared about the group, just themselves.

Lets see what the TA has to offer and then make an informed decision. My guess, MEC approval and it gets voted in by the pilots.

And scope is a mute point as several have pointed out.
Moot point. Scope isn’t a moot point. The retirement at all costs, even the future, crowd doesn’t want to address the threat and they are hanging on to the false narrative there is nothing that can be done about Section 1 despite our Scope Chairman saying that ALPA legal finds section 1 to be the most poorly written section in the contract, “full of loopholes and ambiguities.”
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 07:33 AM
  #52  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 155
Likes: 7
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by Yuko
Stan,

honest question….why can Delta fly maximum green slips and get an industry leading contract but we should not?

Is there something special of cargo guys not flying draft and pressure it provides compared to pax guys?

I was not here for the CoVID windfall but just trying to understand the logic here
Not Stan, but my take?
I don't think it's realistic to compare how each pilot group arrives at the results. We use the results in pattern bargaining, not the method. There are too many variables in each pilot group, their negotiation history, culture, priorities on both sides of the table, etc. Maybe Delta management was more wary of potentially energizing their pilots into unwanted actions and ignored the selfish actions of some. Delta has been militant in the past and maybe it wasn't worth it to their management to risk it. Or maybe it was as simple as their management placing value on signing a CBA that will attract talent in the current hiring cycle with a finite number of qualified candidates available.
Contrast that with our situation. Our VP of flight ops basically told our side that an industry leading contract isn't necessary. According to him, a pilot position at FedEx is so coveted, we'll never have any problems hiring the best talent. He's still living in the lost decade where FedEx became the golden child by default and for some reason still thinks that's where we stand. That's the attitude our negotiators faced on the other side of the table - hardly the same situation facing DL pilot negotiators. So, in my opinion, what DL pilots did while they were negotiating has nothing to do with us and our individual choices.
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 08:54 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Emmerson Bigs
Not Stan, but my take?
I don't think it's realistic to compare how each pilot group arrives at the results. We use the results in pattern bargaining, not the method. There are too many variables in each pilot group, their negotiation history, culture, priorities on both sides of the table, etc. Maybe Delta management was more wary of potentially energizing their pilots into unwanted actions and ignored the selfish actions of some. Delta has been militant in the past and maybe it wasn't worth it to their management to risk it. Or maybe it was as simple as their management placing value on signing a CBA that will attract talent in the current hiring cycle with a finite number of qualified candidates available.
Contrast that with our situation. Our VP of flight ops basically told our side that an industry leading contract isn't necessary. According to him, a pilot position at FedEx is so coveted, we'll never have any problems hiring the best talent. He's still living in the lost decade where FedEx became the golden child by default and for some reason still thinks that's where we stand. That's the attitude our negotiators faced on the other side of the table - hardly the same situation facing DL pilot negotiators. So, in my opinion, what DL pilots did while they were negotiating has nothing to do with us and our individual choices.
Great post
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 10:23 AM
  #54  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 200
Default

Originally Posted by magic rat
The NC has seen it, and they eluded on multiple occasions,
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
the shear nature of the inflationary environment we find ourselves in right now.
Originally Posted by Stan446
scope is a mute point as several have pointed out.
This is painful.
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 10:33 AM
  #55  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446
Emmerson Biggs. Spot on.

Finally a sane post. I said it before, we had leverage the last two years when we had record loads but guys had to keep flying overtime. The inherent greed was amazing. And, here we are now with guys complaining that the contract may not meet their expectations. We should have given our union and the NC the tools and leverage as soon as the last contract expired. But, we had guys who put themselves first and banked the bucks. Its disappointing to see so many contracts where we could have gotten more but not enough pilots cared about the group, just themselves.

Lets see what the TA has to offer and then make an informed decision. My guess, MEC approval and it gets voted in by the pilots.

And scope is a mute point as several have pointed out.
We gave the negotiating committee great leverage in the form of a 99% approval in the strike authorization vote. Moving down the process of the RLA is the only thing that creates real leverage. Let's hope they didn't squander it by accepting some turd.
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 11:05 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 847
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
This is painful.
Guilty. Seven Hail Haggards coming your way.
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 11:15 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: DA-40
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
This is painful.
Agread. Vary paneful.
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 12:29 PM
  #58  
DLax85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 0
From: Gear Monkey
Default

Originally Posted by oncewasgood
….
Based on what I am hearing, I still believe this will be a great contract with big retirement improvements, as well as top banded pay rates. Smatter in some increased premium pay levels and revision improvements, etc…
Simple question: based on what “you’re hearing”, what improvements did we grant to the company to gain the great contract you describe above ?

I assume your sources painted a full picture for you. Please share “what you’re hearing”

Thanks

In Unity (for Everyone),
DLax
Reply
Old 06-10-2023 | 03:17 PM
  #59  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 200
Smile

Originally Posted by MalteseX
Agread. Vary paneful.
Beautiful........
Reply
Old 06-11-2023 | 01:55 AM
  #60  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by oncewasgood
You have completely flipped your position. Looking back through your post you were one of the biggest bellyachers who complained that we didn’t have a contract 12-18 months ago. It’s very obvious by you defending the “subcontractor“ mentality, that you most likely partook your self. very interesting to see the usernames defending that type of behavior. It’s obvious who those were that partook. As a famous comedian, once said “here’s your sign“.
Hey Norworkallplay, we should've had a contract by now. Especially since we opened limited sections and had a focused and targeted negations. The strike vote should've been called for long before it was. Like I said, that's the only thing that creates real leverage.

In regards to flying extra, I have a deal for you. I'll be you $50K I've credited less hours than you have in the last 2 years. Interested?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deftone
Career Questions
14
02-08-2021 08:13 PM
DrMantisTobogan
Frontier
59
09-24-2018 06:09 AM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
6
08-12-2007 09:33 PM
HSLD
Hangar Talk
0
03-04-2007 09:20 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
0
02-21-2006 10:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices