Search

Notices

A Simple Reminder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2023 | 04:59 PM
  #31  
FrankTheTank's Avatar
Fill'er Up Again
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
From: Scarebus Captain
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
"it's the best we can get"
What makes a FedEx pilot not worth the same as a legacy? I truly don’t get it. Do we produce less revenue? Are passengers more profitable than cargo that allow employees to properly compensated? If you think about it, a Legacy 777 will have 3 to 4 pilots and maybe 10 flight attendants. How can the company not afford to just pay pilots? All these red herring arguments are distractions. The company can afford to pay us not only market rates, but industry leading rates. We just happen to work for an employer that wants a war. It doesn’t have to be this way, but if that’s the way management wants it, then we have to stand our ground at all costs.

"we can't guarantee that the next deal won't be worse",
I have reached the point where I don’t care. If this TA does not meet our criteria, I can only take it as an insult and an offense. If the next deal is worse, we turn that one down too. We go to the end of the line and see where that takes. I have a family. I don’t want the turmoil. But if that’s where management leads, I can only stand my ground and know what I’m worth.

"time value of money",
Being underpaid by 5% with a lagging retirement comes at a cost too.

"its not concessionary because the total value of the deal is greater"
Concessions are viewed against the previous contract. American and Delta and UPS passed with zero concessions. Why are we always the ones that agree to concessions?
Yes, yes, yes and yes!
Reply
Old 06-08-2023 | 05:23 PM
  #32  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
"it's the best we can get"
What makes a FedEx pilot not worth the same as a legacy? I truly don’t get it. Do we produce less revenue? Are passengers more profitable than cargo that allow employees to properly compensated? If you think about it, a Legacy 777 will have 3 to 4 pilots and maybe 10 flight attendants. How can the company not afford to just pay pilots? All these red herring arguments are distractions. The company can afford to pay us not only market rates, but industry leading rates. We just happen to work for an employer that wants a war. It doesn’t have to be this way, but if that’s the way management wants it, then we have to stand our ground at all costs.

"we can't guarantee that the next deal won't be worse",
I have reached the point where I don’t care. If this TA does not meet our criteria, I can only take it as an insult and an offense. If the next deal is worse, we turn that one down too. We go to the end of the line and see where that takes. I have a family. I don’t want the turmoil. But if that’s where management leads, I can only stand my ground and know what I’m worth.

"time value of money",
Being underpaid by 5% with a lagging retirement comes at a cost too.

​​​​​​​"its not concessionary because the total value of the deal is greater"
Concessions are viewed against the previous contract. American and Delta and UPS passed with zero concessions. Why are we always the ones that agree to concessions?
I 100% agree with you and feel the same way. I was just answering the question about why people aren't impressed with the responses they get from their reps. It should be an industry leading contract that stands on its own merits without some word salad sales pitch from ALPA.
Reply
Old 06-08-2023 | 08:49 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman
Meet you back here to see how your argument shifts to "Well its not everything that we asked for but what's the alternative?" Hope is a pretty poor strategy, but for those unwilling to fight what else is left. Trust and believe when the TA is published I will be here to listen to your equivocations and arguments in favor of it.
Oh Mr Burning Bush. We don’t know what it says. We all have some expectations. Most don’t expect to be second fiddle to airlines that have not made money while we did. It’s just some of us don’t feel the need to get our panties in a bunch until we actually read it. You don’t know my priorities so stop assuming because we knows what happens when you assume. Calmate amigo. Your circular firing squad approach to consensus building sucks. Your valid points are lost when you present them like you do. If it’s a weak TA, it will hopefully get voted down. If not, we can be happy and maybe you can find another hobby.
Reply
Old 06-08-2023 | 09:04 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 28
From: 4A2FU
Default

I also emailed my rep and got a very irritating response. Looks like we’re gonna have to shoot this one down ourselves and replace our reps if they don’t start listening to us.
Reply
Old 06-08-2023 | 10:25 PM
  #35  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

Originally Posted by NotOldNotYoung
Oh Mr Burning Bush. We don’t know what it says.
Waiting to get "our panties" in a bunch until after this agreement comes out will be too late. The best outcome could be that we put enough pressure on the MEC to reject a deal that doesn't meet their stated priorities. If you honestly think the information about what's in this deal is not being circulated you're being naive and you have know way of knowing what anyone knows. I don't want to read a bad deal. In fact we should never even see it. Don't know why the logic behind that escapes you. If the firing squad is circular its because some of us seem to think having the membership at large vote on a bad deal is a good idea. 57% to 43% that's what that gets you around here.

If the MEC rejects this thing there's still an opportunity to keep moving towards self help.

PS the burning bush was God directing Moses to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. The analogy is a bit over the top but if that's the message you're getting I'm good with it.

Last edited by Shaman; 06-08-2023 at 10:26 PM. Reason: No need to quote
Reply
Old 06-08-2023 | 10:44 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman
Waiting to get "our panties" in a bunch until after this agreement comes out will be too late. The best outcome could be that we put enough pressure on the MEC to reject a deal that doesn't meet their stated priorities. If you honestly think the information about what's in this deal is not being circulated you're being naive and you have know way of knowing what anyone knows. I don't want to read a bad deal. In fact we should never even see it. Don't know why the logic behind that escapes you. If the firing squad is circular its because some of us seem to think having the membership at large vote on a bad deal is a good idea. 57% to 43% that's what that gets you around here.

If the MEC rejects this thing there's still an opportunity to keep moving towards self help.

PS the burning bush was God directing Moses to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. The analogy is a bit over the top but if that's the message you're getting I'm good with it.
Only a narcissist like you could not see the sarcasm in the Burning Bush analogy. 🤦‍♂️

it hasn’t made it out of the process to be even considered by the crew force. You sound like the arrogant politicians who can’t be bothered with what the majority might vote. You are so much wiser than everybody else and if the TA reaches the unwashed masses that vote would be too much responsibility for grown men and women, many with more life experience than you. Last time I checked we are members of ALPA, not Shaman’s Pilot Association. You can start a new union. It can be called SHaman Is The Pilot I Love Emulating. Until then, you get 1 vote like all of us. If the TA sucks, hopefully it gets voted down. If it doesn’t go your way, I hear Delta’s hiring…I’m sure you’d rock the double breasted suit and hat with that attitude.

Last edited by NotOldNotYoung; 06-08-2023 at 10:56 PM.
Reply
Old 06-08-2023 | 11:06 PM
  #37  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

Originally Posted by NotOldNotYoung
Only a narcissist like you could not see the sarcasm in the Burning Bush analogy. 🤦‍♂️
Trying to employ sarcasm yet being unable to recognize it is not the best look.

The name calling and denigrating another pilot group is also a nice touch. One never knows what will trigger some people.

So I will apologize for saying things you don't like. If you need a hug let me know.
Reply
Old 06-08-2023 | 11:37 PM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman

The name calling and denigrating another pilot group is also a nice touch..
Says the person who “denigrates” the crew force he works with and the union representing him 🤔. Can’t try and play the voice of calm and reason here when you’ve gotten all hot and bothered all week.

I really do think Delta, United or AA might be a better fit for you. You don’t seem happy and You are too smart to stay with this basket of deplorables here.

It’s after midnight….Friday is upon us. You’ll see a TA soon…or not if the MEC sends it back. Then you might have a reason to debate like an adult.

Hugs
Reply
Old 06-09-2023 | 04:16 AM
  #39  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

Originally Posted by NotOldNotYoung
Says the person who “denigrates” the crew force he works with and the union representing him 🤔. Can’t try and play the voice of calm and reason here when you’ve gotten all hot and bothered all week.

I really do think Delta, United or AA might be a better fit for you. You don’t seem happy and You are too smart to stay with this basket of deplorables here.

It’s after midnight….Friday is upon us. You’ll see a TA soon…or not if the MEC sends it back. Then you might have a reason to debate like an adult.

Hugs
oh no sir you are correct I am not the calm voice of reason. Reasonable is what produced the document that you're so eagerly awaiting. You reasonable people are willing to entertain an agreement with pay rates that will be exceeded by all three main Pax carriers. The deplorables will believe them when they tell you the overall economic value is the largest in fedex history. And you'll believe them. Enjoy your consolation prize. You're exactly the type of guy this company loves the ones that settle. The ones who want to quash descent so you can get yours. If you believe you are n the majority why waste time arguing on the internet? You don't want to fight for anything cause you're too comfortable with what you got.

Like I said we will all meet you back here so you can tout the merits of our industry leadong contract. One thing you said was right those at Delta and united rejected substandard deals and got something better. We need more of that here instead of encouraging it to leave.
Reply
Old 06-09-2023 | 05:36 AM
  #40  
PA31's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: 757 right seat
Default

There’s a lot of talk about concessions when nobodies even seen the contract.
I’ll withhold judgement until it comes out.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deftone
Career Questions
14
02-08-2021 08:13 PM
DrMantisTobogan
Frontier
59
09-24-2018 06:09 AM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
6
08-12-2007 09:33 PM
HSLD
Hangar Talk
0
03-04-2007 09:20 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
0
02-21-2006 10:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices