Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   TA 1.5 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/143891-ta-1-5-a.html)

MalteseX 08-15-2023 05:31 PM


Originally Posted by magic rat (Post 3682288)
Im perfectly competent to handle my hotel receipts no problem. If you can’t do that then you shouldn’t be flying airplanes. That is NOT worth what we gave up.

I hope you and your fellow block 1 yes voters enjoy your retirement. You only had TWO other CBAs to fix it and ya didn’t. Buh-bye.

Thats why it gets fixed this time around. Two Cbas plus this TA. Retirement still not good enough

Tuck 08-15-2023 06:34 PM


Originally Posted by Maddog64 (Post 3682994)
If all you are worried about is the lost pay for 2 more years, why aren’t you advocating for just taking the company openers almost 3 years ago. You could have had their offer then. There is more to fight for than just pay.

Obviously your first negotiation junior. There is no "offer" in their openers. Wake up and then grow up.

Yuko 08-15-2023 06:46 PM


Originally Posted by seefive (Post 3682921)
Qualified folks?? It doesn’t matter how many militant people “step up”. FedEx will not roll over to massive demands just because you elect new people. The freight always moves and short of a quick fix, it’s going to be years and massive monetary losses by the pilot group before anything gets done.

Hello fellow poster,

No one said rollover, you are injecting something that nobody Is petitioning for. This TA was a weak concessionary proposal that should not have made it past the MEC. One may say it was akin to a stickup for a bump in retirement. Oh yeah, that bump left out 300 retirees (number to grow) and had so many attacks on qol, job security and career progression. We have not even touched pay rates yet. I am glad we voted it down.

I repeat for the folks in the back and the middle passage readers. No one is looking for a “rollover”. We want a profitable company and compensatory acknowledgment of our work.

The next hard part is ahead of us, assembling a new team to move forward.

Until then, save some room on your surveys for not a single pilot left behind for retro retirement. Why? Because every future retiree is worth it, every single NOW retiree is worth it and every past retiree since amenable date is worth it.

We did not delay the pension improvement, our company did. We expected them to address this sooner, but they did not. I am not worried, our pilot group (old heads and younguns) will address it NOW and…

NOT a single pilot left behind (300 and growing). Let’s GO!

globalflair 08-17-2023 01:46 PM

I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.

Smoked 08-17-2023 02:07 PM


Originally Posted by globalflair (Post 3684186)
I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.

What’s making you feel that way? Is there some new information that you can share?

Merle Haggard 08-17-2023 02:10 PM


Originally Posted by globalflair (Post 3684186)
I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.

They can furlough, but it will come at a much higher than usual price. They'll never see 90% of those people again. It'll make recall quite a conundrum.

They've never furloughed, they've only watched furloughs on the pax side when all of the pax carriers were bleeding simultaneously. In this case I'd say to management that this doesn't work the way you think it works. All they will do is lose a bunch of sunk costs, never to be recovered, and then end up hiring again in a market where they're the ugliest suitor in the room.

Temocil27 08-17-2023 02:41 PM


Originally Posted by Merle Haggard (Post 3684199)
They can furlough, but it will come at a much higher than usual price. They'll never see 90% of those people again. It'll make recall quite a conundrum.

They've never furloughed, they've only watched furloughs on the pax side when all of the pax carriers were bleeding simultaneously. In this case I'd say to management that this doesn't work the way you think it works. All they will do is lose a bunch of sunk costs, never to be recovered, and then end up hiring again in a market where they're the ugliest suitor in the room.

That sounds pretty on brand, to be honest

NotMrNiceGuy 08-17-2023 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by Merle Haggard (Post 3684199)
They can furlough, but it will come at a much higher than usual price. They'll never see 90% of those people again. It'll make recall quite a conundrum.

They've never furloughed, they've only watched furloughs on the pax side when all of the pax carriers were bleeding simultaneously. In this case I'd say to management that this doesn't work the way you think it works. All they will do is lose a bunch of sunk costs, never to be recovered, and then end up hiring again in a market where they're the ugliest suitor in the room.

This would give us the most massive leverage to exist in pilot hiring after three years. Especially when all the other contracts and UPS would be coming due.

BertMacklinFBI 08-17-2023 05:15 PM


Originally Posted by Temocil27 (Post 3684217)
That sounds pretty on brand, to be honest

haha. Yes. This is most likely their plan. Written in finger paint and glitter. Calibrated with glue eating ceremony.

UnusualAttitude 08-17-2023 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by globalflair (Post 3684186)
I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.

The way the bottom 10% of the seniority list is spread throughout airframes it will be very expensive from a training perspective. Lots of seat movements required.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands