Notices

TA 1.5

Old 08-15-2023 | 05:31 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: DA-40
Default

Originally Posted by magic rat
Im perfectly competent to handle my hotel receipts no problem. If you can’t do that then you shouldn’t be flying airplanes. That is NOT worth what we gave up.

I hope you and your fellow block 1 yes voters enjoy your retirement. You only had TWO other CBAs to fix it and ya didn’t. Buh-bye.
Thats why it gets fixed this time around. Two Cbas plus this TA. Retirement still not good enough
Reply
Old 08-15-2023 | 06:34 PM
  #82  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 12
From: MD11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog64
If all you are worried about is the lost pay for 2 more years, why aren’t you advocating for just taking the company openers almost 3 years ago. You could have had their offer then. There is more to fight for than just pay.
Obviously your first negotiation junior. There is no "offer" in their openers. Wake up and then grow up.
Reply
Old 08-15-2023 | 06:46 PM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 325
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by seefive
Qualified folks?? It doesn’t matter how many militant people “step up”. FedEx will not roll over to massive demands just because you elect new people. The freight always moves and short of a quick fix, it’s going to be years and massive monetary losses by the pilot group before anything gets done.
Hello fellow poster,

No one said rollover, you are injecting something that nobody Is petitioning for. This TA was a weak concessionary proposal that should not have made it past the MEC. One may say it was akin to a stickup for a bump in retirement. Oh yeah, that bump left out 300 retirees (number to grow) and had so many attacks on qol, job security and career progression. We have not even touched pay rates yet. I am glad we voted it down.

I repeat for the folks in the back and the middle passage readers. No one is looking for a “rollover”. We want a profitable company and compensatory acknowledgment of our work.

The next hard part is ahead of us, assembling a new team to move forward.

Until then, save some room on your surveys for not a single pilot left behind for retro retirement. Why? Because every future retiree is worth it, every single NOW retiree is worth it and every past retiree since amenable date is worth it.

We did not delay the pension improvement, our company did. We expected them to address this sooner, but they did not. I am not worried, our pilot group (old heads and younguns) will address it NOW and…

NOT a single pilot left behind (300 and growing). Let’s GO!

Last edited by Yuko; 08-15-2023 at 07:02 PM.
Reply
Old 08-17-2023 | 01:46 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: alpa member
Default

I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.
Reply
Old 08-17-2023 | 02:07 PM
  #85  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by globalflair
I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.
What’s making you feel that way? Is there some new information that you can share?
Reply
Old 08-17-2023 | 02:10 PM
  #86  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 186
Default

Originally Posted by globalflair
I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.
They can furlough, but it will come at a much higher than usual price. They'll never see 90% of those people again. It'll make recall quite a conundrum.

They've never furloughed, they've only watched furloughs on the pax side when all of the pax carriers were bleeding simultaneously. In this case I'd say to management that this doesn't work the way you think it works. All they will do is lose a bunch of sunk costs, never to be recovered, and then end up hiring again in a market where they're the ugliest suitor in the room.
Reply
Old 08-17-2023 | 02:41 PM
  #87  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 588
Likes: 138
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
They can furlough, but it will come at a much higher than usual price. They'll never see 90% of those people again. It'll make recall quite a conundrum.

They've never furloughed, they've only watched furloughs on the pax side when all of the pax carriers were bleeding simultaneously. In this case I'd say to management that this doesn't work the way you think it works. All they will do is lose a bunch of sunk costs, never to be recovered, and then end up hiring again in a market where they're the ugliest suitor in the room.
That sounds pretty on brand, to be honest
Reply
Old 08-17-2023 | 04:12 PM
  #88  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 844
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
They can furlough, but it will come at a much higher than usual price. They'll never see 90% of those people again. It'll make recall quite a conundrum.

They've never furloughed, they've only watched furloughs on the pax side when all of the pax carriers were bleeding simultaneously. In this case I'd say to management that this doesn't work the way you think it works. All they will do is lose a bunch of sunk costs, never to be recovered, and then end up hiring again in a market where they're the ugliest suitor in the room.
This would give us the most massive leverage to exist in pilot hiring after three years. Especially when all the other contracts and UPS would be coming due.
Reply
Old 08-17-2023 | 05:15 PM
  #89  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Temocil27
That sounds pretty on brand, to be honest
haha. Yes. This is most likely their plan. Written in finger paint and glitter. Calibrated with glue eating ceremony.
Reply
Old 08-17-2023 | 05:29 PM
  #90  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 864
Likes: 50
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by globalflair
I smell a furlough after peak. Call me crazy but I think it’s just around the corner.
The way the bottom 10% of the seniority list is spread throughout airframes it will be very expensive from a training perspective. Lots of seat movements required.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shrsailplanes
SkyWest
24
07-19-2021 08:47 PM
Clearbelow12000
Regional
277
07-15-2014 04:33 PM
Globerunner513
Your Photos and Videos
0
04-04-2012 09:47 AM
Beaver
Cargo
20
01-09-2009 09:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices