Search

Notices

Wow! Look at OT!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2023 | 10:21 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 490
Likes: 41
Default

I mean seriously, how are we going to establish a floor with this group where we just don't throw out any theory possible and any explanation is shot down as fake news.
We are spiraling, not sure if anyone else notices. There's calls to get rid of ALPA, we are going to lose this war if we don't let those with level headed thinking lead.
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 10:42 AM
  #22  
Config 3
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 214
Default

Originally Posted by FDXB757CA
Everybody would like more money.. This is reality.. And while we watch all the antics from a bunch a big mouths ripping on years of hard work. Let’s see what the “No’” produce in the next 2-3 years, still on 2015 wages.. Which by the way, is where we would be, negotiating the next contract ..
So what you’re saying is you’d be in favor of any TA that increases wages by any amount? If not, what’s your floor? Would you have been ok with a $10/hr increase? $5/hr? Where do you personally draw the line?
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 12:23 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 43
From: Gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by HvypurplePylot
I mean seriously, how are we going to establish a floor with this group where we just don't throw out any theory possible and any explanation is shot down as fake news.
We are spiraling, not sure if anyone else notices. There's calls to get rid of ALPA, we are going to lose this war if we don't let those with level headed thinking lead.
Theres a difference between getting rid of ALPA representation and getting rid of those who are working in lockstep with the company against the pilot group interests that are leading FedEx ALPA.
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 12:31 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 133
Default

Any of you Bourne Identity conspiracy theorists see the Union email about the x pairings? You will probably just dispel it as the Union and company lies.

We are doomed if this crap continues.
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 12:37 PM
  #25  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 10
Default

“Overnight we received inquiries concerning extra flying, which appeared in Open Time yesterday. We engaged management this morning. They advised that the extra flying was associated with very recent customer demand, particularly in Asia. The demand manifested after the snapshot for the construction of secondary lines. Otherwise, it would have been “known flying” and included in the build process.
Some have suggested via social media that this extra flying was evidence of an aborted wet lease scheme. There is no validity to that information. Please take it as an example of the extreme measures being undertaken by some to create chaos. Such behavior is inconsistent with the ALPA Code of Ethics. Whatever the purpose, the disservice is to you.
There was a valid question here about “known flying,” which has been answered to our satisfaction. We appreciate those who raised it. Should the customer demand that led to this extra flying solidify, we should expect to see it in our September bid period packages.”


Volume is drying up. Loads are down. Maybe going into 4.A.2… If we don’t approve the TA, maybe they might furlough. Oh wait!
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 12:58 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 23
From: Crewmember
Default

Originally Posted by Iwa Washi
“Overnight we received inquiries concerning extra flying, which appeared in Open Time yesterday. We engaged management this morning. They advised that the extra flying was associated with very recent customer demand, particularly in Asia. The demand manifested after the snapshot for the construction of secondary lines. Otherwise, it would have been “known flying” and included in the build process.
Some have suggested via social media that this extra flying was evidence of an aborted wet lease scheme. There is no validity to that information. Please take it as an example of the extreme measures being undertaken by some to create chaos. Such behavior is inconsistent with the ALPA Code of Ethics. Whatever the purpose, the disservice is to you.
There was a valid question here about “known flying,” which has been answered to our satisfaction. We appreciate those who raised it. Should the customer demand that led to this extra flying solidify, we should expect to see it in our September bid period packages.”


Volume is drying up. Loads are down. Maybe going into 4.A.2… If we don’t approve the TA, maybe they might furlough. Oh wait!

Don't you love it when they bring up the ALPA Code of Ethics, after they played fuzzy math games with compensation and total worth of the TA to try to sell it to us?
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 01:23 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 43
From: Gear slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer
Don't you love it when they bring up the ALPA Code of Ethics, after they played fuzzy math games with compensation and total worth of the TA to try to sell it to us?
And projected furloughs in slides to use fear to get votes in favor…
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 01:46 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Asleep in the Crew Bunk
Default

Has anyone here read the union's latest message regarding this subject? Put out today.
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 02:08 PM
  #29  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 195
Default

Take that message as you will.

We suddenly went from a horrible environment to so much demand from Asia that we’re scrambling to meet it?

If they want to explain it away, it would’ve helped to explain that whole officer stock trade freeze business that just happened to coincide with the surprise volume that just happened to show up after construction.

It may all be innocent, but this is the level of trust that the company and the association have earned at this point - that’s the real overarching issue here.

I’m not sure how either entity can regain the trust of the crew force - and I’m not convinced that either one cares to.

The company and the MEC are like a spouse that was caught cheating yet they are indignant that you wouldn’t just trust them.

“Don’t trust - just verify “
Reply
Old 07-27-2023 | 02:11 PM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Sitting down, I get up and walk around so it just depends
Default

Originally Posted by iflyatnite
Has anyone here read the union's latest message regarding this subject? Put out today.

you mean that condescending trash email? The union has lost touch with the pilots. The TA proved that. They need to get out of the way and let a new set of folks represent us. ALPA sucks too! Join up with UPS union in the long term!


epstein did not off himself!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andy
Foreign
58
01-15-2019 05:44 PM
Trowserchilli
Frontier
39
12-20-2018 05:32 AM
jetstar1
FedEx
15
09-06-2015 07:44 AM
Aviatormar
Regional
28
07-14-2007 07:30 PM
jeepthrills
Pilot Health
4
06-04-2007 09:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices