Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
carrying FEDEX freight on other cargo airline >

carrying FEDEX freight on other cargo airline

Search
Notices

carrying FEDEX freight on other cargo airline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2024, 08:11 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Position: 727 Flight Engineer
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by max8222 View Post
🦄🦄 Two pink ponies for you. Southwest has the best scope. Don't know if it is because of their contract or their corporate philosophy.
It’s codified in their contract. Hard concept to grasp, I know.
TheBear is offline  
Old 03-09-2024, 08:28 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: MD-11 Guru
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by max8222 View Post
Tell me what company has tight scope and I will show you my pink pony.

Tigers use to furlough each year during off peak Jan-July then recall for peak. Maybe you would like that business model better.

UPS has tight scope, and has successfully enforced that language. In our scope defenitions, any flight that takes off or lands in the US, to include AK,HI,PR is considered domestic. (ANC to SZX is domestic, and because it takes off and lands on US soil is enforceable)
MD11Simnerd is offline  
Old 03-09-2024, 09:57 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,091
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Simnerd View Post
UPS has tight scope, and has successfully enforced that language. In our scope defenitions, any flight that takes off or lands in the US, to include AK,HI,PR is considered domestic. (ANC to SZX is domestic, and because it takes off and lands on US soil is enforceable)
ALPA doesn't believe that even UPS level scope is enforceable despite the contrarian evidence.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 03-10-2024, 05:46 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 597
Default

All right Mr codified what is the tight language thatbsupports this great scope language?
max8222 is offline  
Old 03-10-2024, 07:22 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Simnerd View Post
UPS has tight scope, and has successfully enforced that language. In our scope defenitions, any flight that takes off or lands in the US, to include AK,HI,PR is considered domestic. (ANC to SZX is domestic, and because it takes off and lands on US soil is enforceable)
Seems you are knowledgeable at many airlines.
Stan446 is offline  
Old 03-10-2024, 07:46 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: MD-11 Guru
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446 View Post
Seems you are knowledgeable at macny airlines.
Not really, but I have been at UPS for over 23 years. If UPS was not forced by clear language to utilize IPA crews as stated and enforced in the agreement, they would slowly whittle the airline down as the saw fit. The only reason we are an airline is due to the FAA forcing them to have a certificate vs. keeping the contractors that were on the property in 1988.

Once UPS is required to utilize IPA crews on the "domestic" (ANC-SZX, HKG, etc is domestic in our agreement) legs, it does not make sense financially to complete the rotations internationally with charter airines.
MD11Simnerd is offline  
Old 03-10-2024, 07:52 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 283
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Simnerd View Post
Not really, but I have been at UPS for over 23 years. If UPS was not forced by clear language to utilize IPA crews as stated and enforced in the agreement, they would slowly whittle the airline down as the saw fit. The only reason we are an airline is due to the FAA forcing them to have a certificate vs. keeping the contractors that were on the property in 1988.

Once UPS is required to utilize IPA crews on the "domestic" (ANC-SZX, HKG, etc is domestic in our agreement) legs, it does not make sense financially to complete the rotations internationally with charter airines.
here at FedEx. Fred said it would never happen. So we’ll be fine.
BertMacklinFBI is offline  
Old 03-10-2024, 08:09 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 597
Default

Sure are a lot of 767 in CGN without Brown tails. Also awhile back I had a few pallets that were only UPS labeled boxes?

UPS wet leases like we do during peak. Outside of COVID wet lease contracts or peak wet leases when was the last time a wet lease flew across an ocean as a wet lease for FEDEX.
max8222 is offline  
Old 03-10-2024, 08:38 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by max8222 View Post
Sure are a lot of 767 in CGN without Brown tails. Also awhile back I had a few pallets that were only UPS labeled boxes?

UPS wet leases like we do during peak. Outside of COVID wet lease contracts or peak wet leases when was the last time a wet lease flew across an ocean as a wet lease for FEDEX.
Who honestly knows. Remember when they used to tell new hires that lying is one of three unforgivable acts that will get you fired with no recourse? The other two being theft and carrying a weapon through a checkpoint…

Anywho, does the Gulf of Mexico qualify as an ocean for the sake of this argument? Does the secret wet lease they signed with Kalitta for those MIA - Central America routes count? Maybe someday FDX will figure out the mysterious process of obtaining permission to fly those routes on purple tails with purple pilots, assuming they were truthful in actually pursuing those permits… I’m definitely not holding my breath.

Remember when CGN was closing and we were told don’t worry, the EUR flights were going to be incorporated into the M757 bidpack?! We see how that’s playing out. Instead, we have EUR pilots with single departure lines to…America. If you believe a fraction of their fancy tri-color presentations and how they’re not going to impact our flying then I have some oceanfront property in Phoenix I’ll sell you for the deal of a lifetime!! I’d recommend reading the company’s official response to the FreightWaves article dated 2 February on the investor relations webpage if you’d like a little more “color” surrounding tricolor.
YellowBanana is offline  
Old 03-10-2024, 10:03 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Position: 727 Flight Engineer
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by max8222 View Post
All right Mr codified what is the tight language thatbsupports this great scope language?
I see you asked in Southwest thread and got your answer.
TheBear is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD90PIC
Cargo
196
05-24-2021 06:56 AM
gzsg
Delta
30
10-28-2015 08:42 AM
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 05:40 PM
StripAlert
Mergers and Acquisitions
354
07-07-2008 08:05 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices