Let's See What FedEX TA Turn Out
10-08-2015, 06:13 PM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by MaxKts
Where do you get all that? This is why some have a problem with you. Someone counters your logic and you go all out on them.
I'm not upset, I don't plan on quiting ALPA, And even if I wanted to, which I don't, I can not withhold dues!
If this TA passes, I will collect my signing bonus, take my pay raise and in six years take my 30K! SLB won't be a factor because I don't plan on working that hard my last couple of years, although, I think we will all be working harder than we wish!
If the TA fails, I will do whatever is asked of me by the MEC!
Life goes on with a yes vote and the world does not implode with a no vote!
Although, with a yes vote 8 in 24 is gone forever and our retirement will continue to erode!
I'm not upset, I don't plan on quiting ALPA, And even if I wanted to, which I don't, I can not withhold dues!
If this TA passes, I will collect my signing bonus, take my pay raise and in six years take my 30K! SLB won't be a factor because I don't plan on working that hard my last couple of years, although, I think we will all be working harder than we wish!
If the TA fails, I will do whatever is asked of me by the MEC!
Life goes on with a yes vote and the world does not implode with a no vote!
Although, with a yes vote 8 in 24 is gone forever and our retirement will continue to erode!
I responded to some other foreign poster that unity was supporting the MEC while they negotiate and then supporting them after we (the voters) decide on a course of action.
You butt in with a response that has absolutely nothing to do with my response to UPStarman and say "we decided on a course of action the openers". I guess you consider that countering my logic.
I point out hey we are beyond that. A TA trumps openers. If it gets voted in what are you going to do? And you take exception to it. You gave a snarky response to my post i replied in kind with about 10 % of the snark.
For the record, openers don't mean squat in section 6 negotiations. Particularly after a mediated TA is reached and is voted on by the MEC.
Last edited by FDXLAG; 10-08-2015 at 06:31 PM.
10-08-2015, 06:17 PM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by CloudSailor
Yeah, let's not even have polls to determine openers in 2021. Better yet, let's not have any type of goals next time around. Let's just settle for whatever the company offers. Uhhh, like this time. 
You don't like the process I don't like the process. That and 2.25 will get you a tall pikes place.
10-08-2015, 06:48 PM
#55
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
You know Fock this place.
I responded to some other foreign poster that unity was supporting the MEC while they negotiate and then supporting them after we (the voters) decide on a course of action.
You butt in with a response that has absolutely nothing to do with my response to UPStarman and say "we decided on a course of action the openers". I guess you consider that countering my logic.
I point out hey we are beyond that. A TA trumps openers. If it gets voted in what are you going to do? And you take exception to it. You gave a snarky response to my post i replied in kind with about 10 % of the snark.
For the record, openers don't mean squat in section 6 negotiations. Particularly after a mediated TA is reached and is voted on by the MEC.
I responded to some other foreign poster that unity was supporting the MEC while they negotiate and then supporting them after we (the voters) decide on a course of action.
You butt in with a response that has absolutely nothing to do with my response to UPStarman and say "we decided on a course of action the openers". I guess you consider that countering my logic.
I point out hey we are beyond that. A TA trumps openers. If it gets voted in what are you going to do? And you take exception to it. You gave a snarky response to my post i replied in kind with about 10 % of the snark.
For the record, openers don't mean squat in section 6 negotiations. Particularly after a mediated TA is reached and is voted on by the MEC.
I have a lot more to say but I will leave it at that.
10-08-2015, 06:58 PM
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by MaxKts
There you go again...
I have a lot more to say but I will leave it at that.
I have a lot more to say but I will leave it at that.
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
It actually does matter where you work. You want a no vote because you think it will give your union a stronger hand. Nothing wrong with that, it is in your self interest.
Unity while we are in negotiations is one thing. Unity after we vote on a contract is another issue. Every vote is based one way or the other on self interests. But once we as a group decide on a course of action then it takes all of us to achieve it. And that is what we as indiviiduals are deciding, which step are we going to take next. It is in your self interest to join a union and it is in your self interest to see that the union is successful.
Unity while we are in negotiations is one thing. Unity after we vote on a contract is another issue. Every vote is based one way or the other on self interests. But once we as a group decide on a course of action then it takes all of us to achieve it. And that is what we as indiviiduals are deciding, which step are we going to take next. It is in your self interest to join a union and it is in your self interest to see that the union is successful.
10-08-2015, 07:09 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
We have another site?
I heard the MEC meeting today was mostly a one man filibuster by a no voter who finally had members in attendance asking him to shut up so people could actually ask questions about the TA. I had to laugh because it sounded just like an average day on APC.
10-08-2015, 07:13 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Originally Posted by GetRealDude
"BBB"
Blah, blah, blah.
A fitting new profile name for LAG. Devoid of substance and nonsensical, contrarian nonsense.
Blah, blah, blah.
A fitting new profile name for LAG. Devoid of substance and nonsensical, contrarian nonsense.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
