Search

Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

Nicholas Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2025 | 03:14 AM
  #161  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 280
Default

Originally Posted by 60av8tor
A bazillion people on this board have as well. Yes, everything is relative, but when you take a job with a garbage operator (not saying they are, but I do remember hearing some comments in the past) it doesn’t take long for you to really see how the other half lives and realize the pile of $hit you hitched your wagon to. BuT iTs NoT A BOx…

Yes it can really can be that bad! (relatively speaking)
Yup. Id work at Home Depot before doing any 135 work. Young or old, its not worth it; plenty of other places to look for flying gigs. Just my .02
Reply
Old 08-30-2025 | 07:13 PM
  #162  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 26
From: B777/CA retired
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
Yup. Id work at Home Depot before doing any 135 work. Young or old, its not worth it; plenty of other places to look for flying gigs. Just my .02
And that is total APC bulls###.

If you are looking to fly past 65 or you are getting furloughed from your airline or any other reason that you suddenly find yourself unemployed right now your options are limited. Painting 135 as all bad is spray painting when you need to be using an artist’s brush. Not saying Nicholas is great, or even decent. My only experience with them was that one of their management pilots was in my class at SWC, and he left us within a year so I am not sure of the truth on their operations.

But having a job flying is key to getting your next and better job flying. Unless you are typed and/or have strong connections you will not be flying mid to large cabin part 91 jets. 135 gets you that type and time. You just need to be able to be strong enough to be able to tell them to GFYS if they try to pull shady mx or scheduling practices. But how often does that really occur? I’ve done 135 before and after my 121 career. I never ran across that type of pressure. Most operators just want you to work your tour and go home with little or no drama from either side. The nature of charter ops in itself is prone to changes day to day. Don’t get that confused with being pushed to be illegal. No one on either side really wants to deal with an FAA violation. And as a LCA who talks with their POI I can tell you that the FAA pays attention to 135 operations.
Reply
Old 08-31-2025 | 01:38 PM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,419
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike
And that is total APC bulls###.

If you are looking to fly past 65 or you are getting furloughed from your airline or any other reason that you suddenly find yourself unemployed right now your options are limited. Painting 135 as all bad is spray painting when you need to be using an artist’s brush. Not s

I'm not saying Nicholas is great, or even decent. My only experience with them was that one of their management pilots was in my class at SWC, and he left us within a year so I am not sure of the truth on their operations.

But having a job flying is key to getting your next and better job flying. Unless you are typed and/or have strong connections you will not be flying mid to large cabin part 91 jets. 135 gets you that type and time. You just need to be able to be strong enough to be able to tell them to GFYS if they try to pull shady mx or scheduling practices. But how often does that really occur? I’ve done 135 before and after my 121 career. I never ran across that type of pressure. Most operators just want you to work your tour and go home with little or no drama from either side. The nature of charter ops in itself is prone to changes day to day. Don’t get that confused with being pushed to be illegal. No one on either side really wants to deal with an FAA violation. And as a LCA who talks with their POI I can tell you that the FAA pays attention to 135 operations.
CactusMike for the victory!
Reply
Old 09-02-2025 | 04:44 PM
  #164  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Simms529
Ok, I'm just trying to be honest with myself. It really can't be that bad.....can it? I lived in a box for years, flying combat missions, eating and surviving on jerky and rip-its. Now, I'm a little longer in the tooth and I tend to be pretty positive of what I got. So, when I read these comments, I ask myself how bad is it there?
It's pretty bad. Rarely do pilots stay for more than a year or two. For good reason. Management changes out fairly often, but the guy at the top with his name on the company stays the same and that right there is probably the issue. To those who say the FAA keeps watch over them, guess again. They've been investigated numerous times and always gotten off the hook. They even used to brag about FAA folks at the FSDO being on the take during indoc. I doubt they still advertise that, but it would be hard to recommend this place unless it was an absolute last resort!
Reply
Old 09-03-2025 | 04:07 AM
  #165  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 280
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike
And that is total APC bulls###.

If you are looking to fly past 65 or you are getting furloughed from your airline or any other reason that you suddenly find yourself unemployed right now your options are limited. Painting 135 as all bad is spray painting when you need to be using an artist’s brush. Not saying Nicholas is great, or even decent. My only experience with them was that one of their management pilots was in my class at SWC, and he left us within a year so I am not sure of the truth on their operations.

But having a job flying is key to getting your next and better job flying. Unless you are typed and/or have strong connections you will not be flying mid to large cabin part 91 jets. 135 gets you that type and time. You just need to be able to be strong enough to be able to tell them to GFYS if they try to pull shady mx or scheduling practices. But how often does that really occur? I’ve done 135 before and after my 121 career. I never ran across that type of pressure. Most operators just want you to work your tour and go home with little or no drama from either side. The nature of charter ops in itself is prone to changes day to day. Don’t get that confused with being pushed to be illegal. No one on either side really wants to deal with an FAA violation. And as a LCA who talks with their POI I can tell you that the FAA pays attention to 135 operations.
These forums are discussion. People asking/talking about different areas of the industry and I offered my opinion; for me, my own view. I've heard an exorbitant amount of negative issues with guys/gals that have been at 135 operations that I personally wouldn't consider one myself. Not "APC bull#$%#" , lighten up Francis.
Reply
Old 09-03-2025 | 04:44 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,419
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
These forums are discussion. People asking/talking about different areas of the industry and I offered my opinion; for me, my own view. I've heard an exorbitant amount of negative issues with guys/gals that have been at 135 operations that I personally wouldn't consider one myself. Not "APC bull#$%#" , lighten up Francis.
You stated, as a professional pilot, that you'd rather work at Home Depot than fly for a Part 135 operator. Now it sounds like you've never even worked at one??? It's not airline flying but with a 7/7 schedule it's a decent gig. Yes, the actual operator matters. At m last company a retired airline guy said "this is my 3rd (4th?) Part 135 operator, and while they have issues, it's by far the best."


Reply
Old 09-04-2025 | 02:09 PM
  #167  
cornerpocket's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 590
Likes: 71
Default

Originally Posted by GooseMcGoose
they reiterated that they "really don't like to train people who are going to leave us."
I'd be asking myself "Does this place have a retention problem?" And if so, why? Doesn't sound like they're trying very hard to create and foster an environment where employees (pilots) want to stay. Not all 135 outfits are as bad as this place sounds. Just may take a little searching and luck to find them.
Reply
Old 09-07-2025 | 02:09 PM
  #168  
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
Bent over by buybacks
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 588
Default

Originally Posted by Simms529
Ok, I'm just trying to be honest with myself. It really can't be that bad.....can it? I lived in a box for years, flying combat missions, eating and surviving on jerky and rip-its. Now, I'm a little longer in the tooth and I tend to be pretty positive of what I got. So, when I read these comments, I ask myself how bad is it there?
Good lord, get a grip and put some value on your skill set. Being a vet and deploying for months and years is no excuse. There industry is full of us.
First lesson: your civilian employer is not your friend, does not care about you, and will pay you as little as possible. There is no "greater good" other than money. Your mantra should be "more money, more time off," and fight to get it. Don't settle for scraps.
Reply
Old 09-07-2025 | 04:50 PM
  #169  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 280
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
You stated, as a professional pilot, that you'd rather work at Home Depot than fly for a Part 135 operator. Now it sounds like you've never even worked at one??? It's not airline flying but with a 7/7 schedule it's a decent gig. Yes, the actual operator matters. At m last company a retired airline guy said "this is my 3rd (4th?) Part 135 operator, and while they have issues, it's by far the best."
Yes. I've worked at a 91k/135 gig.
Reply
Old 09-07-2025 | 06:21 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,419
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
Yes. I've worked at a 91k/135 gig.
You're going to Home Depot. $18/hr, before you'd fly for a Part 135 company again? $36,000 a year, 5 days a week vs. $100,000+. Not buying it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphonso1
Charter
142
05-01-2017 08:29 PM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
Lbell911
Major
29
07-31-2007 05:02 PM
HIREME
Regional
61
01-24-2007 07:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices