Karbon Aviator II
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 453
By definition a "uniform" should be, ...well uniform.
Ditch the trench, if that's important to them, and dictate either Karbon, or Blazer. No hat required. Simple.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 228
Case in point why this whole Karbon; but only if you wear a hat. And if not then you can wear the trench with or without a hat is completely silly.
By definition a "uniform" should be, ...well uniform.
Ditch the trench, if that's important to them, and dictate either Karbon, or Blazer. No hat required. Simple.
By definition a "uniform" should be, ...well uniform.
Ditch the trench, if that's important to them, and dictate either Karbon, or Blazer. No hat required. Simple.
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 453
Oh I agree. They would have to pay for all of it!
#38
It's a cost of doing business.
They do everything in bad faith, that's the problem.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 658
I do think there is an argument to be made by our union that the company introduced a new uniform option that they claim is outside the contract by declaring that “it’s optional.” The “it’s optional” slippery slope that could be used against us in many areas of the contract that are far more important than hats! This is the union’s fight, I wouldn’t protest it out on the line by being out of compliance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post