Notices

News thread

Old 06-05-2023 | 06:49 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 119
From: Joystick Operator
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900
Really doesn't work that well with the ULCC business model. When you have a business model that generates over 50% of the revenue via ancillary fees, you want to shuffle as many people on and off the plane as possible. Long haul doesn't do that. You'd make more money flying a 320 4 short legs than a 330 on just one leg. 4x the bag fees, 4x the seat fees etc.

The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.

Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
but. but... they put Dublin on a recruiting ad???
Reply
Old 06-05-2023 | 07:01 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900
Really doesn't work that well with the ULCC business model. When you have a business model that generates over 50% of the revenue via ancillary fees, you want to shuffle as many people on and off the plane as possible. Long haul doesn't do that. You'd make more money flying a 320 4 short legs than a 330 on just one leg. 4x the bag fees, 4x the seat fees etc.

The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.

Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
Ya the only reason I could ever see it being used would be to code share with Wizz and cross the streams.

Actually with a few small twists this clip fits our lives half way decent. Haha
https://m.youtube.com/watch?embeds_r...&v=9wrEEd1ajz4
Reply
Old 06-05-2023 | 07:22 PM
  #13  
Windsor's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 433
Likes: 10
From: Zee Airboos
Default

Nobody wants to be crammed on our piece of **** seats with no amenities for any pond crossings. Our passengers can't afford European or Hawaiian vacations. We dont market to those who can afford better. There will be no pond crossings in our future.
Reply
Old 06-05-2023 | 08:55 PM
  #14  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900
Really doesn't work that well with the ULCC business model. When you have a business model that generates over 50% of the revenue via ancillary fees, you want to shuffle as many people on and off the plane as possible. Long haul doesn't do that. You'd make more money flying a 320 4 short legs than a 330 on just one leg. 4x the bag fees, 4x the seat fees etc.

The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.

Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
Fair and solid points. I'd toss a thought and say it doesn't work with the CURRENT ulcc model but in the future it might. Yes my post was one in good fun but I don't think it's out of the realm. Speculation is always a fun thing!

Ref
Reply
Old 06-06-2023 | 10:06 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900
If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
Air Transat in Canada operates a high density config A330 with only 12 "club" seats. I did a quick check, and each seat in club is only about 300 dollars more. I think a version of long-haul ULCC exists out there, but it isn't our current product.
Reply
Old 06-06-2023 | 02:18 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
Wouldn't surprise me. However, I have a feeling it will turn into more flights there, most likely connecting across the pond when the XLRs arrive... Just a hunch.

Until then, most likely more LGA turns, and letting other airlines use our gates/slots for extra income.
Lol’d at this, thanks. LGA has a perimeter rule and the runways are 7,000ft.

Maybe you can launch NRT from SNA next? Lol
Reply
Old 06-07-2023 | 09:47 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ToddChavez
Air Transat in Canada operates a high density config A330 with only 12 "club" seats. I did a quick check, and each seat in club is only about 300 dollars more. I think a version of long-haul ULCC exists out there, but it isn't our current product.
F9 could probably pack 500+ into an A350-1000XWB. I’d bet we could fill them up. Word on the street is that the XLR doesn’t make economic sense with a full load for Frontier. It will only add a few hundred miles of range, if that, operating out of high altitude airports.
Reply
Old 06-07-2023 | 10:27 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Happy
Default

If you want to fly a 330/350 definitely do not apply here. The 321s will certainly do some interesting flying they never made a secret of that. How and what / which models is still TBD. You don’t need XLRs for Western Europe. Which from PHL is almost as long as MCO - ONT.

South America will definitely happen. I welcome all business. Just sign me up for the under 2 hour block day turns and home for dinner thanks
Reply
Old 06-07-2023 | 11:06 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 28
Default

Originally Posted by 303flyboy
If you want to fly a 330/350 definitely do not apply here. The 321s will certainly do some interesting flying they never made a secret of that. How and what / which models is still TBD. You don’t need XLRs for Western Europe. Which from PHL is almost as long as MCO - ONT.

South America will definitely happen. I welcome all business. Just sign me up for the under 2 hour block day turns and home for dinner thanks
It is?

Straight line:

KMCO-KONT: 1887 NM
KPHL-EIDW: 2844 NM
Reply
Old 06-07-2023 | 11:20 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Happy
Default

You are absolutely correct. Feels about the same distance in the winter doing 350 over the ground to ONT as it does going to Dublin from the East coast. Been 8 years since I did the WB thing. Slept for most of it.

However I am pretty sure you understand the larger point I was trying to get across
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kuma66
Air Wisconsin
3
04-21-2019 03:11 AM
Planetrain
Delta
90
10-27-2018 08:45 PM
iahflyr
SkyWest
1273
08-27-2017 03:46 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices