News thread
#11
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 119
From: Joystick Operator
Really doesn't work that well with the ULCC business model. When you have a business model that generates over 50% of the revenue via ancillary fees, you want to shuffle as many people on and off the plane as possible. Long haul doesn't do that. You'd make more money flying a 320 4 short legs than a 330 on just one leg. 4x the bag fees, 4x the seat fees etc.
The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.
Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.
Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
#12
Thread Starter
Almost there
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Really doesn't work that well with the ULCC business model. When you have a business model that generates over 50% of the revenue via ancillary fees, you want to shuffle as many people on and off the plane as possible. Long haul doesn't do that. You'd make more money flying a 320 4 short legs than a 330 on just one leg. 4x the bag fees, 4x the seat fees etc.
The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.
Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.
Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
Actually with a few small twists this clip fits our lives half way decent. Haha
https://m.youtube.com/watch?embeds_r...&v=9wrEEd1ajz4
#13
Nobody wants to be crammed on our piece of **** seats with no amenities for any pond crossings. Our passengers can't afford European or Hawaiian vacations. We dont market to those who can afford better. There will be no pond crossings in our future.
#14
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Really doesn't work that well with the ULCC business model. When you have a business model that generates over 50% of the revenue via ancillary fees, you want to shuffle as many people on and off the plane as possible. Long haul doesn't do that. You'd make more money flying a 320 4 short legs than a 330 on just one leg. 4x the bag fees, 4x the seat fees etc.
The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.
Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
The other problem is utilization. When the aircraft are all on monthly lease payments you need to run as many flights/ hours as possible. Again, doesn't work well easily for long haul flights.
Long haul low cost has been a major problem or a flat out failure business model. If the big, experience jet is only going to fly 1 or 2 legs a day, it needs the mega expensive 1st class revenue
Ref
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: FL
Air Transat in Canada operates a high density config A330 with only 12 "club" seats. I did a quick check, and each seat in club is only about 300 dollars more. I think a version of long-haul ULCC exists out there, but it isn't our current product.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Maybe you can launch NRT from SNA next? Lol
#17
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
F9 could probably pack 500+ into an A350-1000XWB. I’d bet we could fill them up. Word on the street is that the XLR doesn’t make economic sense with a full load for Frontier. It will only add a few hundred miles of range, if that, operating out of high altitude airports.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Happy
If you want to fly a 330/350 definitely do not apply here. The 321s will certainly do some interesting flying they never made a secret of that. How and what / which models is still TBD. You don’t need XLRs for Western Europe. Which from PHL is almost as long as MCO - ONT.
South America will definitely happen. I welcome all business. Just sign me up for the under 2 hour block day turns and home for dinner thanks
South America will definitely happen. I welcome all business. Just sign me up for the under 2 hour block day turns and home for dinner thanks
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 28
If you want to fly a 330/350 definitely do not apply here. The 321s will certainly do some interesting flying they never made a secret of that. How and what / which models is still TBD. You don’t need XLRs for Western Europe. Which from PHL is almost as long as MCO - ONT.
South America will definitely happen. I welcome all business. Just sign me up for the under 2 hour block day turns and home for dinner thanks
South America will definitely happen. I welcome all business. Just sign me up for the under 2 hour block day turns and home for dinner thanks
Straight line:
KMCO-KONT: 1887 NM
KPHL-EIDW: 2844 NM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: Happy
You are absolutely correct. Feels about the same distance in the winter doing 350 over the ground to ONT as it does going to Dublin from the East coast. Been 8 years since I did the WB thing. Slept for most of it. 
However I am pretty sure you understand the larger point I was trying to get across

However I am pretty sure you understand the larger point I was trying to get across
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



