![]() |
Originally Posted by JoeFever1
(Post 3681783)
No like this.
Frontier is not a sinking ship. We are not going to fold. When was the last time you saw a profitable business fold? Never. Our biggest and only real competitor (Spirit) is about to disappear from the market. The upstart competitor (Breeze) is bleeding money like a scene in a Tarantino film. We have our issues, but they can all be fixed. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3681811)
We have our issues, but they can all be fixed.
Look at EVERY airline that's ever failed. |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3681891)
But therein lies the issue. We ALL know what the issues are at the grassroots/ground level. It took THIS long to increase turn times - I and several others mentioned that months ago. The solutions we need are everywhere around us and obvious to everyone but the people who can actually make the changes. The company makes money but doesn't function well at all. Non-functioning companies EVENTUALLY falter - either you get so bad that the customer pool dries up (some are suggesting that is happening already) or leadership just continues to make so many bad decisions that the expenses outgrow the revunue.
Look at EVERY airline that's ever failed. Those are easy fixes. The things that are hard to get right for an airline like cost structure, we have nailed. We operate at a lower cost structure with more fuel efficiency than any airline in history. If Frontier could clean up the operation, Increase staffing levels, stop treating the passengers so poorly, and then increase ticket fares a little, we could make an absolute killing. Will our current management team do these things? I have no idea. Maybe they need to be flushed and get fresh blood in the office. I don't know, but this place has so much potential! Our 321NEOs with 240 seats coupled with the lowest cost structure in the industry has the potential to be a serious power house. Easy fixes could be made. In the right hands, this place could kill |
Frontier is amaze-balls.
|
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3681891)
But therein lies the issue. We ALL know what the issues are at the grassroots/ground level. It took THIS long to increase turn times - I and several others mentioned that months ago. The solutions we need are everywhere around us and obvious to everyone but the people who can actually make the changes..
|
Originally Posted by Dragonslayer69
(Post 3681937)
I think if the general population knew how bad the operation really was the company would be forced to change. Crew and employees complaining just bounce off management and the executive staff. Miserable on time performance doesn’t phase them. Money leaking out of every inefficiency orifice doesn’t seem to matter. But, embarrass them publicly and take a bite out of ticket sales. Maybe that will do something.
|
Originally Posted by Mooneyguy
(Post 3681949)
But there is the real issue. We see the mess. The horrible operations. The p’d off passengers. Management see’s numbers and right now the numbers are saying we are profitable. The numbers say even p’d off pax come back for more. To them it’s fine. Barry doesn’t have to deal with it. When he goes home to Dallas he rides AA. When the numbers tell them there is a problem (no profit) then they will make a change.
Franke may be asking why his profit margin is the same as all the others whose cost structures are much greater. Why aren’t we MORE profitable given how we operate? He’s no dummy. The very cost structures which are supposed to be advantageous (less gate agents, cheaper ground staffing, etc) aren’t proving to be that way. We aren’t even close to maximizing profit. With the lowest CASM in the industry, why don’t we have the highest profit margin? |
Originally Posted by Mooneyguy
(Post 3681949)
But there is the real issue. We see the mess. The horrible operations. The p’d off passengers. Management see’s numbers and right now the numbers are saying we are profitable. The numbers say even p’d off pax come back for more. To them it’s fine. Barry doesn’t have to deal with it. When he goes home to Dallas he rides AA. When the numbers tell them there is a problem (no profit) then they will make a change.
Our margins are down not because our CASM isn’t low enough, but because our RASM is way too low. We have grown way more quickly in the past year than they originally had planned and all that new capacity hasn’t yet produced the revenue it should. Some of that has to do with domestic travel demand being lower, and the corresponding lower ticket prices. |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3681991)
I think it’s going beyond that now.
Franke may be asking why his profit margin is the same as all the others whose cost structures are much greater. Why aren’t we MORE profitable given how we operate? He’s no dummy. The very cost structures which are supposed to be advantageous (less gate agents, cheaper ground staffing, etc) aren’t proving to be that way. We aren’t even close to maximizing profit. With the lowest CASM in the industry, why don’t we have the highest profit margin? |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3681991)
I think it’s going beyond that now.
Franke may be asking why his profit margin is the same as all the others whose cost structures are much greater. Why aren’t we MORE profitable given how we operate? He’s no dummy. The very cost structures which are supposed to be advantageous (less gate agents, cheaper ground staffing, etc) aren’t proving to be that way. We aren’t even close to maximizing profit. With the lowest CASM in the industry, why don’t we have the highest profit margin? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:26 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands