![]() |
Originally Posted by TurboFanMan
(Post 3740563)
I don’t see the implementation. Looking at the bid sheet for January ATL is still 50 percent turns and 50 percent multi day trips. Whoever wrote that memo is talking out their a**! 😂
|
Originally Posted by Blueskies67
(Post 3740797)
Yeah we’re getting hit with the expanded Pratt inspections that just got announced they’re planning on us being over staffed this summer due to it.
|
Originally Posted by TurboFanMan
(Post 3740563)
I don’t see the implementation. Looking at the bid sheet for January ATL is still 50 percent turns and 50 percent multi day trips. Whoever wrote that memo is talking out their a**! 😂
Right now, isn't our fleet only about 30 Pratt powered planes out of 130+ fleet? |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3740820)
I'm pretty sure they said the increase in day turns would be by spring. So we definitely seeing it reflected in pairings yet.
Right now, isn't our fleet only about 30 Pratt powered planes out of 130+ fleet? |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3740835)
25/136 to be exact. So we should almost double our P&W fleet by end of next year.
That being the case, its hard to imagine Pratt engine inspections will cause us significant harm. And I'm still not sure if our motors will even need inspections at all? |
Originally Posted by Blueskies67
(Post 3740797)
Yeah we’re getting hit with the expanded Pratt inspections that just got announced they’re planning on us being over staffed this summer due to it.
The Pratt inspections are for engines produced mid 2021 and earlier. I believe all of ours are after that date and don't apply. |
I find it hard to believe that P&W would sell engines to Airbus with a known defect and Airbus would just ignore that defect and deliver them to customers with a note:
"Congrats on your recent purchase of an Airbus A321NEO. Oh, by the way, your $130M aircraft needs to go offline immediately for inspections, because P&W continues to manufacture bad fan blades and we continue to sling those engines beneath our airplanes. If you have further questions please call 1-800-SUCK-ITT" The issue was contaminated raw material wasn't it? Seems like they wouldn't continue using that material for new deliveries. |
Originally Posted by Dragonslayer69
(Post 3740980)
I find it hard to believe that P&W would sell engines to Airbus with a known defect and Airbus would just ignore that defect and deliver them to customers with a note:
"Congrats on your recent purchase of an Airbus A321NEO. Oh, by the way, your $130M aircraft needs to go offline immediately for inspections, because P&W continues to manufacture bad fan blades and we continue to sling those engines beneath our airplanes. If you have further questions please call 1-800-SUCK-ITT" The issue was contaminated raw material wasn't it? Seems like they wouldn't continue using that material for new deliveries. |
Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590
(Post 3741283)
Meanwhile in OEB land….
|
What's the word? Anything?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands