Think GoJet will lose the Delta flying?
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,419
The 220 is mostly growth into markets the RJ can’t/won’t do, DL regional partners are still scoped - they may park the old comair 700s but something in the same market will replace them. That being said we are talking about a airline that operates 30+ year old airplanes because they are paid for.
#62
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 873
I have flown almost every route announced for the a220 in a 7/9 (except NY flying). I think DL will largely replace the -200s they have now, in the last 6 years they have gone from what 300+ 50 seaters to 120. SKW just announced they will retire many of their 700s and replace them with 70 seat -900s (skw 700s are newer than the G7 planes). As for the 30 year old planes the md-80s are going away and the 757s do what 3-4 cycles a day vs the 6-8 the rj does.
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
The 220 is replacing a lot of RJ flying. Look at the routes it is gonna be flying, all of them were run by 70-76 airplanes. They will use the 220 to further retiree the 50 seaters like what they did with the 717. I think all 70/76 seat flying will stay but the majority of 50 seaters will go away.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
They aren't. They are retiring 200s. 700s that are getting replaced by 900 lites are looking for a new home and were presumably going to fly on the American side, but the American 700s coming online having EV tail numbers. The last newsletter that came out said that the company is looking to place the Delta 700s (which are being replaced by 900 lites) somewhere.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Position: Feeder of Amber
Posts: 229
OO has been taking the EV -700s from Delta ops and putting them in the AA system. AA likes the -700s because with 65 seats it less, they are classified as “small RJ’s” and are not limited in scope. The only way the United G7 -700s keep flying is if they fly for AA. United has plans to replace them and Delta doesn’t want them either.
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,419
when they announced the -900s mgmt told us these would be a 1 for 1 replacement of many of our DL -700s, that the 700s taken from the DL side would go to the AA side and we would lose 20 -200s to XJT for a no net gain of flying. not sure if the AA side will end up with them or just the EV planes. but I doubt skw will just let them sit.
#67
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 873
when they announced the -900s mgmt told us these would be a 1 for 1 replacement of many of our DL -700s, that the 700s taken from the DL side would go to the AA side and we would lose 20 -200s to XJT for a no net gain of flying. not sure if the AA side will end up with them or just the EV planes. but I doubt skw will just let them sit.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
OO has been taking the EV -700s from Delta ops and putting them in the AA system. AA likes the -700s because with 65 seats it less, they are classified as “small RJ’s” and are not limited in scope. The only way the United G7 -700s keep flying is if they fly for AA. United has plans to replace them and Delta doesn’t want them either.
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
I have flown almost every route announced for the a220 in a 7/9 (except NY flying). I think DL will largely replace the -200s they have now, in the last 6 years they have gone from what 300+ 50 seaters to 120. SKW just announced they will retire many of their 700s and replace them with 70 seat -900s (skw 700s are newer than the G7 planes). As for the 30 year old planes the md-80s are going away and the 757s do what 3-4 cycles a day vs the 6-8 the rj does.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post