![]() |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 1697940)
I don't have an issue with his life being ruined IF he's guilty. A guy his age with kids who doesn't know better than to do what he did would probably commit full-on rape if he thought for sure he could get away with it. He'd probably do anything at all if he could get away with it.
My issue is that the whole case is very much he-said/she-said with no objective evidence whatsoever. I think he's guilty, but not beyond a reasonable doubt and I don't really think you can achieve that standard in this situation. "Sleep drunkenness" affects 1 in 7 Americans, study finds - CBS News Anyways I do feel bad for derailing the thread. So today I nominate both the man and woman that got kicked off the flight for battling over seat recline. No lengthy discussion here there is another thread for that. ;) |
This month's Flying magazine "Jumpseat" article. 2 page complaint about a tug being broke on pushback. And it happened on 777 "reserve after 30 years at company, a status he hadn't held since he upgraded 24 yrs ago." How much more out-of-touch with reality can one be?
|
He had to park and un-park the brakes so many times!!
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 1728103)
This month's Flying magazine "Jumpseat" article. 2 page complaint about a tug being broke on pushback. And it happened on 777 "reserve after 30 years at company, a status he hadn't held since he upgraded 24 yrs ago." How much more out-of-touch with reality can one be?
|
Originally Posted by captjns
(Post 1701239)
Can you say Mummy and Daddy? Or perhaps a rich wife:rolleyes:
|
Tool of the day
I miss reading TOTD, so I'm bringing it back!
This guy: http://qz.com/233165/the-pilots-of-instagram-beautiful-views-from-the-cockpit-violating-rules-of-the-air/ |
Originally Posted by saxman66
(Post 1781176)
I miss reading TOTD, so I'm bringing it back!
This guy: http://qz.com/233165/the-pilots-of-i...es-of-the-air/ They're a tool for writing such a long and boring article! Sounds like some wannabe investigative reporter to me lol Otherwise, they have a point regarding the takeoff and landing photos...that's stupid to divert attention at those moments. But if they're using a gopro which they review AFTER the flight then no big whoop. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by eman
(Post 1781188)
They're a tool for writing such a long and boring article! Sounds like some wannabe investigative reporter to me lol
Otherwise, they have a point regarding the takeoff and landing photos...that's stupid to divert attention at those moments. But if they're using a gopro which they review AFTER the flight then no big whoop. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk The interesting thing about the T/O and Landing pics is that at least from my view, 4 out of the 6 were obviously taken from the jumpseat. Don't know many pilots who like to straddle the center console on approach. The 2 taken from the CA and FO seats are pretty foolish to post but the other 4 don't bother me in the least. |
Actually, the TOTD are the guys who flout FAA regs. How about a little professionalism out there, boys?
|
Originally Posted by Packrat
(Post 1781487)
Actually, the TOTD are the guys who flout FAA regs. How about a little professionalism out there, boys?
I mean a go-pro camera from the inside of a fighter jet or space shuttle seems cool, but I find it rather toolish to go-pro film an entire working leg at a 121 carrier. For Example.... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands