Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Tool of the day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2017 | 05:59 AM
  #9761  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,164
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76
Any guy with a man bun is a TOTD!
You're just now realizing this?

But I could make an exception for shell-shocked 'nam vets.
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 06:28 AM
  #9762  
SeamusTheHound's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 3
From: 757/767 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
I didn't think a whole Company could be TOTD. Looks like I was wrong.

In spades...
Wow...Captain with a man-top-bun....awesome.
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 06:29 AM
  #9763  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
Are we sure that wasn't just an elaborate plan for those guys to get laid?
Master plan uncovered. You win!
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 06:30 AM
  #9764  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SeamusTheHound
Wow...Captain with a man-top-bun....awesome.
He-Hive? Maybe
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 07:47 AM
  #9765  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 583
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

Gonna nominate myself for the absolutely terrible ILS I flew today.

We were close behind a Super in our little RJ, in IMC, so I clicked off the AP so I could stay a dot high on GS, then clicked off the FD because its 'fly down' commands were getting distracting. Ended up off centerline and high. I made it work, and we were never outside our SOP tolerances, and we landed in the TDZ, but it was one of those days where you just feel like you've forgotten how to fly. Oh well. Hopefully tomorrow will be better...
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 09:52 AM
  #9766  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Gonna nominate myself for the absolutely terrible ILS I flew today.

We were close behind a Super in our little RJ, in IMC, so I clicked off the AP so I could stay a dot high on GS, then clicked off the FD because its 'fly down' commands were getting distracting. Ended up off centerline and high. I made it work, and we were never outside our SOP tolerances, and we landed in the TDZ, but it was one of those days where you just feel like you've forgotten how to fly. Oh well. Hopefully tomorrow will be better...
When you say you weren't outside sop. That means you probably were.
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 09:56 AM
  #9767  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Gonna nominate myself for the absolutely terrible ILS I flew today.

We were close behind a Super in our little RJ, in IMC, so I clicked off the AP so I could stay a dot high on GS, then clicked off the FD because its 'fly down' commands were getting distracting. Ended up off centerline and high. I made it work, and we were never outside our SOP tolerances, and we landed in the TDZ, but it was one of those days where you just feel like you've forgotten how to fly. Oh well. Hopefully tomorrow will be better...
You need to check out the FAA video on how wingtip vortices work. Unless you had a tailwind, there's no need for you to ever fly an ILS "a dot high". Doing that only puts your vortices in the next guy's glide path.
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 11:30 AM
  #9768  
Dolphinflyer's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 687
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
You need to check out the FAA video on how wingtip vortices work. Unless you had a tailwind, there's no need for you to ever fly an ILS "a dot high". Doing that only puts your vortices in the next guy's glide path.

He was in a RJ following a Super. Good catch in case a C-172 was next on approach.

I'll go for the 1/2-1 dot high in that case too depending on ceiling height. I see your point if the Super's are never a dot high and tailwinds are never present on approach.
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 12:07 PM
  #9769  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by Dolphinflyer
He was in a RJ following a Super. Good catch in case a C-172 was next on approach.

I'll go for the 1/2-1 dot high in that case too depending on ceiling height. I see your point if the Super's are never a dot high and tailwinds are never present on approach.
Tailwinds, sure. But a Super is probably flying a coupled approach.
Reply
Old 09-18-2017 | 01:07 PM
  #9770  
contrails's Avatar
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
You need to check out the FAA video on how wingtip vortices work. Unless you had a tailwind, there's no need for you to ever fly an ILS "a dot high". Doing that only puts your vortices in the next guy's glide path.
I've encountered significant wake turbulence on glideslope with no tailwind and I'm sure hundreds others on this forum have, too.

Sometimes the vortices behave like the textbook ones, sometimes they don't. Sometimes local effects like a thermal could hold them up in place right in the glideslope with no tailwind at all.

If you feel wake starting, be a pilot and come up 1/4 or a half dot on the G/S.

Tool-of-the-day would be the one who drones along through the wake waiting for the really good jolt of it down low around 100-200', the kind that can push an RJ or even E170 size jet laterally right off the runway course.

I even had to go around last year in a 717 following an A330. At 200' we hit wake that quickly pushed us to the side and got us in an uncorrectable spot. Nothing could be done but go-around.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis90
Military
2
11-11-2010 09:25 AM
meloveboeing
Regional
5
10-02-2010 07:47 AM
kc135driver
United
122
08-24-2010 08:30 AM
exerauflyboy5
Flight Schools and Training
15
02-18-2009 08:29 PM
Busdriver
JetBlue
70
01-16-2006 10:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices