Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Tool of the day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2017 | 09:50 PM
  #9961  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: doggy style
Default

Originally Posted by BFMthisA10
Why would you waste your time doing that. Might as well spend your time thinking about a plane on a treadmill.
No kidding... all those bozos who think the plane would actually takeoff...
Reply
Old 11-25-2017 | 03:51 AM
  #9962  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 278
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Fletch727
No flame with this guy - he's using steam...

A man is about to launch himself in his homemade rocket to prove the Earth is flat - Chicago Tribune

Always thought these people were a joke until my limo driver on a Vancouver overnight had the flat earth conversation with me. The captain was definitely grateful to have chosen the back seat.
Many great scientific discoveries were inadvertent (Big Bang, penicillin, etc.). The results of this experiment may be similar. While attempting to prove the earth is flat, he may unintentionally provide proof for the theory of natural selection.
Reply
Old 11-25-2017 | 06:34 AM
  #9963  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cougar
Many great scientific discoveries were inadvertent (Big Bang, penicillin, etc.). The results of this experiment may be similar. While attempting to prove the earth is flat, he may unintentionally provide proof for the theory of natural selection.
Though yes he is proving that his genes are not worth passing on Im gonna contest that the big bang theory of cosmology was an inadvertent discovery. Rather the discovery that the galaxies were receding at a rate proportional to there distance was perhaps inadvertent. But to build the big bang itself, that required a lot of work. It needed Einstiens theory of relativity (general), tons of additional observations, and now even incorporates particle physics (for the early universe). In an odd twist, Einstien initially worked to prove a static universe and added a constant to his equation to show it. He later regretted this move and called it his biggest blunder. Interesting though the constant has been reapplied but for a different purpose.

Not looking to start an argument, but if we are to rip on the flat earthers for their blatant ignorance, we gotta make sure we are absolutely accurate as well
Reply
Old 11-25-2017 | 11:19 AM
  #9964  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 278
Likes: 2
Default

Was referring to Cosmic Microwave Background radiation discovered by Wilson and Penzias accidentally in 1964, for which they won the Nobel. At the time the static cosmology model was still competing with the Big Bang.
Reply
Old 11-25-2017 | 03:22 PM
  #9965  
Ski Bird's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 140
Likes: 16
Default

Beat it, nerds.
Reply
Old 11-25-2017 | 07:03 PM
  #9966  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Default

the Guy who feels everyone else is”....ing up there job”, and they are the only reason this airline functions. They chew everyone’s ass in sight and are just miserable. Makes any trip over five minutes too long, let alone 3-4 day trip. Misery makes company.
Reply
Old 11-26-2017 | 06:35 AM
  #9967  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 1
From: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Default

Originally Posted by NeverHome
Though yes he is proving that his genes are not worth passing on Im gonna contest that the big bang theory of cosmology was an inadvertent discovery. Rather the discovery that the galaxies were receding at a rate proportional to there distance was perhaps inadvertent. But to build the big bang itself, that required a lot of work. It needed Einstiens theory of relativity (general), tons of additional observations, and now even incorporates particle physics (for the early universe). In an odd twist, Einstien initially worked to prove a static universe and added a constant to his equation to show it. He later regretted this move and called it his biggest blunder. Interesting though the constant has been reapplied but for a different purpose.

Not looking to start an argument, but if we are to rip on the flat earthers for their blatant ignorance, we gotta make sure we are absolutely accurate as well
You're comparing apples and oranges. Einstein was working to figure things out. Much like climate change, there is no longer any figuring out to be done with respect to a flat Earth. Either you accept that it's round or you choose to be a nincompoop
Reply
Old 11-26-2017 | 07:21 AM
  #9968  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by thevagabond
You're comparing apples and oranges. Einstein was working to figure things out. Much like climate change, there is no longer any figuring out to be done with respect to a flat Earth. Either you accept that it's round or you choose to be a nincompoop
Im not comparing anything. Rather Cougar made a statement that could be viewed as in accurate. And yes it is true that Penzias and Wilson inadvertently discovered the CMB. It is also true that it was theoretically predicetd well in advance of their discovery. That is they key here, let me explain.

A key aspect to good science is the ability to collect facts and then make predictions based on those facts. Even if the prediction turns out false, we will have still learned something about those facts (they may be incomplete, or even not relevant). So what predictions do our friends who believe the earth is flat make? None from what I can see. So their “facts” need to be re-evaluated or put to a test.

Its funny that the flat earthers use pseudoscience to make there point. Thats cool and all (silly if you ask me), but they dont make solid predictions that others may verify. Not only other individuals but other branches of science. Its no suprise that a spherical earth (oblate spheroid) is veried by astronomy, geophysics, and to some extent by us as pilots. There is no cross reference in a flat earth model.

Ok, ive said alot here. Again I want to make sure that the facts are out there. Besides its fun to talk science
Reply
Old 11-26-2017 | 01:43 PM
  #9969  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NeverHome
So what predictions do our friends who believe the earth is flat make?
They make many, it's just that they're equally consistent with the much more parsimonious round Earth.
Reply
Old 11-26-2017 | 01:53 PM
  #9970  
Ski Bird's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 140
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by vessbot
They make many, it's just that they're equally consistent with the much more parsimonious round Earth.
Parsimonious? Yeah, I hate when the Earth is stingy or frugal too.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis90
Military
2
11-11-2010 09:25 AM
meloveboeing
Regional
5
10-02-2010 07:47 AM
kc135driver
United
122
08-24-2010 08:30 AM
exerauflyboy5
Flight Schools and Training
15
02-18-2009 08:29 PM
Busdriver
JetBlue
70
01-16-2006 10:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices