Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Hiring News
Republic Airlines is Recruiting off PilotPool >

Republic Airlines is Recruiting off PilotPool

Search
Notices
Hiring News Latest news and rumors

Republic Airlines is Recruiting off PilotPool

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2013, 12:06 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: Flying a desk, for good.
Posts: 208
Default

maybe the turnover math is working against them. retention is becoming important. at some point it may lead to shortage, but that remains to be seen.
scubabri is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 03:13 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
+1 again. I could have written this.



Well I do not dispute HR says this, but it means only one thing- they do not want pilots who are too expensive (by their own definition) to train. Not that there is any shortage of pilots at all. They want to skim the cream off the milk, not have to pay 5 cents for extra sims or training. Not that there is any shortage of pilots, period. There is a shortage of super-cheap pilots, that's all. I have seen working pilots being turned away, picking one guy out of 7 during this "staffing crisis", and my observations simply do not square with all these wishful claims there is a pilot shortage.
1 out of 7? Whatever lets you sleep at night. Its around 50% overall. They want guys who will stay for at least 2 years. Please work for at least one regional before you think you have a clue-Ive read yur threads before- Keep interviewing and stop making excuses for why you didnt get the job. Good luck man.
Bozo the pilot is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 04:19 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot View Post
1 out of 7? Whatever lets you sleep at night. Its around 50% overall. They want guys who will stay for at least 2 years. Please work for at least one regional before you think you have a clue-Ive read yur threads before- Keep interviewing and stop making excuses for why you didnt get the job. Good luck man.
Exactly. Some people just want any reason/excuse to justify why they can't get hired by a Regional. Maybe they just need more practice in the interview process? Stop the whimpering, learn from your mistakes , get back up on that saddle and give it another try. You ain't the first and you ain't gonna be the last!! Some people have interviewed multiple times before they found the job for them.
brianb is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 05:39 PM
  #44  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Or...

1. There is no pilot shortage at all. Pure urban myth.

2. Regionals hire half of those who come through the door, even though they meet all the mins, and throw capable and qualified people back on the trash pile after every single interview at a rate of about 50%.

3. They will park perfectly good airplanes even to the point of defaulting on flying contracts because they are not happy with higher training costs via using above 50% of those coming through the door even after being pre-qualified by HR screeners.

All I know is the lady at RAH said "you do not have a pilot's license" at my interview and then sent me home, so what am I supposed to think? What would you think? Poor interview skills o my part? No, I had ok-enough interview skills. I have many a successful interview behind me at age 40+, much harder ones than these regional airlines. Rather, the training costs were too high for training me or so they thought and they would rather park the airplanes than let me waste their time.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 07:06 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
Or...

1. There is no pilot shortage at all. Pure urban myth.

2. Regionals hire half of those who come through the door, even though they meet all the mins, and throw capable and qualified people back on the trash pile after every single interview at a rate of about 50%.

3. They will park perfectly good airplanes even to the point of defaulting on flying contracts because they are not happy with higher training costs via using above 50% of those coming through the door even after being pre-qualified by HR screeners.

All I know is the lady at RAH said "you do not have a pilot's license" at my interview and then sent me home, so what am I supposed to think? What would you think? Poor interview skills o my part? No, I had ok-enough interview skills. I have many a successful interview behind me at age 40+, much harder ones than these regional airlines. Rather, the training costs were too high for training me or so they thought and they would rather park the airplanes than let me waste their time.
You're transferring blame bro. Who cares about a shortage? Adjust your attitude and you'll be successful.You're not owed a job-you earn one with the proper experience and the communication skills to relate this to employers. Please stop the entitlement mentality. PM me if you really wanna cut thru it man. Good luck.
Bozo the pilot is offline  
Old 07-10-2013, 06:09 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,128
Default

I've interviewed at 2 regionals without ATP mins and both offered me a position as long as I get the time soon (which I will). I don't know how you didn't get hired. They essentially threw the offer at me.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 05:11 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
roscoe329's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Captain
Posts: 27
Default

if one of the two was Republic go to the other one
roscoe329 is offline  
Old 07-13-2013, 12:57 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STR8NLVL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 411
Default

Or...

1. There is no pilot shortage at all. Pure urban myth.

2. Regionals hire half of those who come through the door, even though they meet all the mins, and throw capable and qualified people back on the trash pile after every single interview at a rate of about 50%.

3. They will park perfectly good airplanes even to the point of defaulting on flying contracts because they are not happy with higher training costs via using above 50% of those coming through the door even after being pre-qualified by HR screeners.

All I know is the lady at RAH said "you do not have a pilot's license" at my interview and then sent me home, so what am I supposed to think? What would you think? Poor interview skills o my part? No, I had ok-enough interview skills. I have many a successful interview behind me at age 40+, much harder ones than these regional airlines. Rather, the training costs were too high for training me or so they thought and they would rather park the airplanes than let me waste their time.
Call me crazy, but I'm guessing your lack of an offer stems from the fact that the person doing the interview, whether incorrect or not, appears to have believed that you didn't hold a valid pilot's license...

Having done interviews at RAH in the past, I can cut through all this garbage and tell you a few things:

1) If they bring you in, we want to hire you. The job's yours to lose. There's no % of failures they shoot for.

2) At the completion of the interviews, all the interviewers that day convene in a room and talk about all the candidates. Candidates are culled for a few reasons, poor test scores on the knowledge or IQ tests, poor attitude during interview, poor performance during sim, some indication that they're just using this position to get current and then bolt, or some combination of the above. That's it. No one is turned down even though they're perfect, but we need to shoot down 50%.

3) I'm not sure what you're saying about the increased training costs, but the crux of what we're looking for, aside from someone without a bad attitude, is someone who can successfully pass training. The day they place your butt in class they've scheduled your sim sessions. If at any point thereafter you bust out or quit, they still have to pay for that time they reserved, to the tune of around $20,000. So, no, if there was something in your past or during your interview that indicated that you might require extra sim time, that would also indicate that you might fail out of training, even after said extra sim time, meaning RAH just wasted $20,000+ on sim time plus your paid wages and expenses. Their job as interviewers is to weed out those who are weaker pilots, or who may have issues during training.
STR8NLVL is offline  
Old 07-13-2013, 01:00 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STR8NLVL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 411
Default

And when I was doing interviews, we typically only passed on about 2 in every 10, give or take. YMMV
STR8NLVL is offline  
Old 07-15-2013, 02:17 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 36
Default

I interviewed with 3 others this spring. All of us had 1400tt 100+ multi. One cfi the other there were with my company. The 3 of us got offers once reaching atp mins. The 4th guy seemed good enough to get an offer and didn't say anything went wrong. one guy had a little sim trouble and was still offered if he completes a jet training program on his own.
ImGoingOutSide is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyitB
Republic Airways
284
08-04-2012 04:32 PM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-26-2009 11:47 PM
Sniper
Major
8
06-18-2009 09:31 AM
Flatspin
Regional
43
02-16-2009 07:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices