Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Horizon Air
What's happening at Horizon and Jets? >

What's happening at Horizon and Jets?

Search
Notices
Horizon Air Regional Airline

What's happening at Horizon and Jets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2016, 06:43 AM
  #591  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by trip View Post
The 900 is actually pretty decent compared to the 700, much more capable aircraft. Certainly not a 175 in the cabin but I will say it's more comfortable in the DL configuration then the godawful back breaker seats SKYW/UA put in their 175's.

I heard it is kind of a pig, compared to the 700? I've only flown the 700, but was told by those who had flown them all that it is in the sweet spot. The 900 is stretched too far, and therefore under-powered.
HeadInTheTops is offline  
Old 02-18-2016, 07:28 AM
  #592  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by cactusflyer View Post
I can kind of see the logic there, since taking introducing someone straight from a GA environment and simultaneously introducing them to part 121 operations and faster airplanes and expecting them to learn that in an airplane that has more workarounds and exceptions than actual procedures really is asking for training issues, especially in this hiring environment.

That said, taking someone who spent four years on a well designed airplane and then upgrading them into the Q400 is certainly going to cause it's share of training shennanigans, but maybe QX is banking on having swapped most of the 400's for jets by the time that problem might present itself.

On the plus side, I believe one of the people who was "right-sized" in the Portland bloodbath a few weeks ago is the person largely responsible for why the Q400 is so over-proceduralized, so maybe the learning curve on the airplane will get slightly less absurd under whoever gets that job next.

I'd be pretty slow to criticize QX's flight standards department. The company has an incredible safety record, and a big part of that is the safety culture that has resulted in trapping systemic errors via procedural revisions.
Don't get me wrong, the blue-sheet squadron can definitely be a pain in the ass (every revision comes with a subsequent revision correcting the previous revision's errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities), but the end result is an incredibly safe operation, considering it's operating arguably the most complex, poorly engineered (common type rating or death- or both!) regional airliner in the least forgiving environments. That airplane hates you, and wants you dead. It will try to get ya in many subtle ways, which is why I toed a pretty hard line on flying fatigued at QX.

There are a helluva lot of procedures, but then, the crews do a helluva lot with the airplane: RNP, CATIII, extensive mountain flying, etc. That's just going to necessitate a lot of procedures.
I've never worked for another company so bloated with middle management fluff and bull**** (Ready, Safe, Go!), but the flight ops department, as a whole, is top-notch.

Catch a brother up, though...who got chopped recently??? Was it the right people, for once?
HeadInTheTops is offline  
Old 02-18-2016, 07:37 AM
  #593  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

Originally Posted by HeadInTheTops View Post
I heard it is kind of a pig, compared to the 700? I've only flown the 700, but was told by those who had flown them all that it is in the sweet spot. The 900 is stretched too far, and therefore under-powered.
Yeah the 700 is the Canadian Space Shuttle. The 900 is kind of a truck. The 200 is a sport car...sport cars don't climb.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 02-18-2016, 07:42 AM
  #594  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Not only possible, but plausible as well. Read the follow on comments. As Skywest gets bigger jets and the fee for service stays reasonable, AS will always go where the yield action is. And for the Q400, that action is up north, especially if they get into the SE Alaska flying.

AS can get just as much EAS money out of the Feds with a Q400 as it can with a 737. I can see the 737s in PAKT and PAJN and the rest of the SE serviced by the Q.

This is what got me off my ass to get out of QX after 15yrs. When they erased our brand and turned us into a CPA carrier (which we formerly weren't), it said to me, "We are preparing to whipsaw you against non-union coattail riders!"
Kinda bummed I was right, but there is no respect for the worker in most of this business, anymore. We are a necessary evil when an airline becomes a spreadsheet with wings.
HeadInTheTops is offline  
Old 02-19-2016, 08:41 PM
  #595  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Have all the Dash 8 Q400 operators had as much trouble with training new hires and captain upgrades as Horizon....Training a HUD adds a couple of hours and RNP adds a couple hours but aside from that it seems you guys do the same as everyone else.....will be telling if and when Horizon tries go get a new fleet up and running....
 
Old 02-19-2016, 09:48 PM
  #596  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit View Post
Have all the Dash 8 Q400 operators had as much trouble with training new hires and captain upgrades as Horizon....Training a HUD adds a couple of hours and RNP adds a couple hours but aside from that it seems you guys do the same as everyone else.....will be telling if and when Horizon tries go get a new fleet up and running....
Well, there's only one other Q400 operator in the US, and they're parking that fleet, and the previous owner of those airplanes crashed one. So it's tough to make a good comparison.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 02-20-2016, 04:13 AM
  #597  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

was not really thinking just the U S....lots of them out there in the world..We used to pride ourselves at Alaska Airlines on having the longest, most expensive, most difficult to pass 737 training programs in the world....on what is likely the easiest, least technologicaly advanced jet in the world....Then one day the money guys noticed and it was over
 
Old 02-20-2016, 05:02 AM
  #598  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UCLAbruins's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: F/O- G-V/550
Posts: 1,163
Default

Does Horizon have its own sims, or you guys use Flight Safety?
UCLAbruins is offline  
Old 02-20-2016, 05:07 AM
  #599  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 216
Default

We do all the sim training at Flight Safety in Seattle, although we have sent people to their Q400 sims in Toronto on (very rare) occasions when the SEA sims have been too full.
cactusflyer is offline  
Old 02-22-2016, 07:01 AM
  #600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800 View Post
Well, there's only one other Q400 operator in the US, and they're parking that fleet, and the previous owner of those airplanes crashed one. So it's tough to make a good comparison.
You can always compare their safety record with Skywest and Alaska!

QX has always had excellent training. Failures increasing are an obvious result of average TT/experience going down.
HeadInTheTops is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Harry Tasker
Horizon Air
790
12-03-2015 09:02 AM
brewpilot
Horizon Air
262
06-26-2012 10:07 AM
tyrael37
Horizon Air
72
05-18-2008 07:58 PM
Flyin1500
Regional
14
05-24-2007 07:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices