Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue buying Frontier? >

JetBlue buying Frontier?

Search

Notices

JetBlue buying Frontier?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:11 AM
  #21  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
This DOJ would allow anything for a buck..


Back to the Frontier idea, this would have made more sense six or seven years ago when Frontier and JetBlue had identical business models. Now it would require either returning Frontier to JetBlue's business model or JetBlue down to Frontiers..
I don't think they give Frontier's current business model more than 1.5 seconds of thought.

Blue shirts, TV's and a network tweak and problem solved.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:11 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
They would have 1 in jfk after they divest ewr.

They would gain a BOS hub and a FLL hub. United’s east coast isn’t exactly great and JB would fill that hole.

With all that said there is no way in hell the DOJ allows it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why would UAL abandon EWR? They are by far the dominant carrier there. Dominant hubs make more money. See ATL and DFW/CLT.

While JetBlue's hub is large in FLL by their standards it is not really a large hub. Look at MIA as an example.

Boston maybe, but why spend $10b (estimated) on acquiring a carrier just for one airport? JFK would need to be divested and that would hand it to Delta or AA.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:12 AM
  #23  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Oh, and moldy pizza and IROP underwear.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:14 AM
  #24  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Why would UAL abandon EWR? They are by far the dominant carrier there. Dominant hubs make more money. See ATL and DFW/CLT.

While JetBlue's hub is large in FLL by their standards it is not really a large hub. Look at MIA as an example.

Boston maybe, but why spend $10b (estimated) on acquiring a carrier just for one airport? JFK would need to be divested and that would hand it to Delta or AA.
They would most likely not have to divest JFK. They allowed Delta to have a very large LaGuardia and JFK operation simultaneously. Maintaining a Newark and JFK operation would not be much of a problem for the DOJ, and JFK and LaGuardia are the only slot controlled airports in the area.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:19 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
They would most likely not have to divest JFK. They allowed Delta to have a very large LaGuardia and JFK operation simultaneously. Maintaining a Newark and JFK operation would not be much of a problem for the DOJ, and JFK and LaGuardia are the only slot controlled airports in the area.
AA also has hubs in JFK and to a lesser extent LGA. Plus jetBlue also has a hub in JFK. EWR is owned by UA almost completely. You can bet they would not allow it.

Delta would be a better candidate for purchasing jetBlue based on their structure. They already have the JFK and (growing) BOS hubs.

That being said do you see the largest carriers becoming larger through acquisitions? I just don't see it being pushed through. Especially with fuel prices rising rapidly.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:35 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by embraerjetpilot
This DOJ would allow anything for a buck..


Back to the Frontier idea, this would have made more sense six or seven years ago when Frontier and JetBlue had identical business models. Now it would require either returning Frontier to JetBlue's business model or JetBlue down to Frontiers..
Yup if Wall St wants it, it can happen.
Not saying it will but guys saying things can’t happen are insane. Sell some stuff to SWA and whatever the other guys want get rid of some competition and there you go.

Who knows these days but anyone sitting around saying no has not watched the industry.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:35 AM
  #27  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
AA also has hubs in JFK and to a lesser extent LGA. Plus jetBlue also has a hub in JFK. EWR is owned by UA almost completely. You can bet they would not allow it.

Delta would be a better candidate for purchasing jetBlue based on their structure. They already have the JFK and (growing) BOS hubs.

That being said do you see the largest carriers becoming larger through acquisitions? I just don't see it being pushed through. Especially with fuel prices rising rapidly.
EWR is no longer slot controlled. I don't think they will look at EWR the same as LGA and JFK any longer. May require giving up some EWR gates, but that's it.

They would not likely allow Delta to buy JB without more JFK divestitures. They have large hubs at both SLOT CONTROLLED NYC airports.

The entire point of blocking a corporate merger of any kind is consumer protection. That is not the priority of this administration or the GOP in general. They priority business interest over the consumer and don't like government interference when not absolutely required.

So yes, I think UAL and JB would be approved with some token divestitures to make it look like they care about protecting consumers.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:35 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
I don't think they give Frontier's current business model more than 1.5 seconds of thought.

Blue shirts, TV's and a network tweak and problem solved.
Pretty much.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 06:43 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 755
Likes: 14
Default

F9 guy here,

As much as we’d love somebody to rescue us from Indigo I don’t see it happening. If JB couldn’t get F9 bought a few years ago they surely can’t now with Indigo’s inflated self-valuation. Add to that JB is losing money with the strongest industry tailwinds we’ve seen in a while, not likely to have the capital Indigo would want to see on the table.

No I’m afraid the world is stuck with Indigo and their visions as long as there are people buying $39 tickets. In fact I see Indigo purchasing a different airline (NK, JB, ??) in a whipsaw attempt before allowing their cash cow to make money for anybody but themselves.
Reply
Old 07-26-2018 | 07:03 AM
  #30  
Covfefe
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg
F9 guy here,

As much as we’d love somebody to rescue us from Indigo I don’t see it happening. If JB couldn’t get F9 bought a few years ago they surely can’t now with Indigo’s inflated self-valuation. Add to that JB is losing money with the strongest industry tailwinds we’ve seen in a while, not likely to have the capital Indigo would want to see on the table.

No I’m afraid the world is stuck with Indigo and their visions as long as there are people buying $39 tickets. In fact I see Indigo purchasing a different airline (NK, JB, ??) in a whipsaw attempt before allowing their cash cow to make money for anybody but themselves.
JetBlue is hardly losing money.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluedriver
JetBlue
310
05-20-2017 03:53 PM
FAULTPUSH
Frontier
137
11-12-2012 12:38 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices