Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JB realistic London expansion >

JB realistic London expansion

Search
Notices

JB realistic London expansion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2019, 06:41 AM
  #111  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,886
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Why limit yourself? Alaska and Southwest are big on the west coast and could provide much more feed. Or forget the feed all together and just position Moxy as a buyout candidate for Alaska or Southwest (and Jetblue) to gobble up. 3 way bidding war, maybe more if the legacies show interest in the A220.

Cheap planes, young pilots, no hassle buyout. Neeleman gets richer.
Because I think this is JB's west coast plan. Use this "codeshare partner" to start a West coast network with costs so low we couldn't do it and the competition can't compete with it. Then after the network is developed we eventually aquire Moxy (like we tried to do with Virgin and Frontier). All pre-planned and pre-ordained with Neeleman who doesn't seem to have a bad relationship with Robbing or Joel Peterson.

We aren't doing this for feed for us so much as a way to start a West coast network that has all the advantages stated above. Without helping or strengthening Alaska. SWA pilots contract wouldn't allow what you said anyway.

And Neeleman still gets richer, and maybe even returns to JB one way or another.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 06:46 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
We are a staffing mess from the standpoint of e190 training. They already have more e190 training backlog then they have resources to handle it, no contingency plan, and no way to open up additional A320 positions without creating even more e190 training events!

And RSAs everyday with crew cancellations, on GOOD WEATHER DAYS!

Not sure why you are arguing this with me? Can you honestly not see the above?
Honestly yes I see it, but there's zero evidence of differals of any aircraft at this point.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 06:46 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
We are a staffing mess from the standpoint of e190 training. They already have more e190 training backlog then they have resources to handle it, no contingency plan, and no way to open up additional A320 positions without creating even more e190 training events!

And RSAs everyday with crew cancellations, on GOOD WEATHER DAYS!

Not sure why you are arguing this with me? Can you honestly not see the above?
Rule 1 of APC thou shall not argue with BD

But I do agree even hyerboy does they have a training mess on their hands.
pilotpayne is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 06:48 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
Because I think this is JB's west coast plan. Use this "codeshare partner" to start a West coast network with costs so low we couldn't do it and the competition can't compete with it. Then after the network is developed we eventually aquire Moxy (like we tried to do with Virgin and Frontier). All pre-planned and pre-ordained with Neeleman who doesn't seem to have a bad relationship with Robbing or Joel Peterson.

We aren't doing this for feed for us so much as a way to start a West coast network that has all the advantages stated above. Without helping or strengthening Alaska. SWA pilots contract wouldn't allow what you said anyway.

And Neeleman still gets richer, and maybe even returns to JB one way or another.
How does our Scope clause limit code sharing with them? Everyone keeps telling me how awesome our Scope is. Maybe as good as our industry leading pairing construction language, eh?
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 06:52 AM
  #115  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,122
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 View Post
How does our Scope clause limit code sharing with them? Everyone keeps telling me how awesome our Scope is. Maybe as good as our industry leading pairing construction language, eh?
Maybe you should re-read that section or call your rep regarding this, it’s important you understand. It’s good protection.
aldonite7667 is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 07:04 AM
  #116  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 View Post
How does our Scope clause limit code sharing with them? Everyone keeps telling me how awesome our Scope is. Maybe as good as our industry leading pairing construction language, eh?
Unlimited code sharing. It's good protection.
PasserOGas is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 07:19 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
Unlimited code sharing. It's good protection.
Yep... all flying will now be assigned to new code shares.

section CBA 1F

It's gonna happen. In fact a company without an operating certificate or planes currently will soon fly all our west coast operations.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 07:21 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by aldonite7667 View Post
Maybe you should re-read that section or call your rep regarding this, it’s important you understand. It’s good protection.

Thanks for your productive input to the conversation.
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 10:20 AM
  #119  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,886
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
Honestly yes I see it, but there's zero evidence of differals of any aircraft at this point.
Well they can't staff A320 deliveries. We are supposed to get 13 A321s THIS year, yet no vacancies posted for them. They are telling check airmen of a 6 month delay in deliveries.

I have been predicting additional Airbus deferrals, you say no. I guess we'll find out.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 01-04-2019, 10:22 AM
  #120  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,886
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16 View Post
How does our Scope clause limit code sharing with them? Everyone keeps telling me how awesome our Scope is. Maybe as good as our industry leading pairing construction language, eh?
You KNOW our scope doesn't prevent what I'm saying... So yes, it's just as effective as our industry leading pairing construction.
Bluedriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
14
05-18-2012 05:28 AM
jsfBoat
Europe
4
04-06-2008 07:13 AM
fireman0174
JetBlue
0
04-05-2006 06:02 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
02-19-2006 10:02 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
06-05-2005 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices