![]() |
I believe that NH pay is a good indicator of how the company will treat you. Not saying that it's worse than XYZ regional, but don't come expecting to be treated well by management.
Gup |
Originally Posted by GuppyPuppy
(Post 2857059)
I believe that NH pay is a good indicator of how the company will treat you. Not saying that it's worse than XYZ regional, but don't come expecting to be treated well by management.
Gup Is that an indication of how those pilots are treated? |
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2857070)
Delta doesn't pay for new hire hotels.
Is that an indication of how those pilots are treated? |
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
(Post 2857082)
No, but they’re paid double what we make during training and get actual profit sharing.
|
Okay. Easy fix, both need to be improved. Our training pay sucks.
Not having a hotel for 4-6 weeks sucks. Unfortunately, this is low on the negotiation table, and in the company’s hands. |
And then there’s first year UPS pay. *rolls eyes.*. I know you make a ton second year but dang.
|
Originally Posted by jtrain609
(Post 2857070)
Delta doesn't pay for new hire hotels.
Is that an indication of how those pilots are treated? I'd list other evidence as to how our pilots are treated, but you already know about that. Gup |
Originally Posted by SmitteyB
(Post 2857057)
70 hours is min guarantee.
|
Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer
(Post 2857182)
It’s not min guarantee for training (80 hours, covered by 4.A.3) and min flying guarantee for a lineholder isn’t really applicable. And while 70 hours is min guarantee...actual hours worked is much higher, even on a 4/hr a day credit for training basis. My point is 70 is an arbitrary number made up by the company using an arbitrary number from somewhere else in the CBA and applying it to new hire training. And $28.57 isn’t a published pay rate anywhere. So both the rate and the credit hours are just made up by the company and not even in the CBA. They get around it because pilot trainees aren’t “pilots” in the CBA definitions. I wouldn’t spend negotiating capital on 6 weeks worth of pay for new hires, since JB does pay for all uniforms and “lodge”ing, and compared to peers it’s about in line. But when calculated out, the effective pay rate in training is about $13/hr for new hires, governed by a policy that doesn’t exist in the CBA.
|
Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer
(Post 2857182)
It’s not min guarantee for training (80 hours, covered by 4.A.3) and min flying guarantee for a lineholder isn’t really applicable. And while 70 hours is min guarantee...actual hours worked is much higher, even on a 4/hr a day credit for training basis. My point is 70 is an arbitrary number made up by the company using an arbitrary number from somewhere else in the CBA and applying it to new hire training. And $28.57 isn’t a published pay rate anywhere. So both the rate and the credit hours are just made up by the company and not even in the CBA. They get around it because pilot trainees aren’t “pilots” in the CBA definitions. I wouldn’t spend negotiating capital on 6 weeks worth of pay for new hires, since JB does pay for all uniforms and “lodge”ing, and compared to peers it’s about in line. But when calculated out, the effective pay rate in training is about $13/hr for new hires, governed by a policy that doesn’t exist in the CBA.
I am not arguing that new hire training pay is sufficient. The OP was trying to understand where they got 70 hours. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands