Working at JB
#521
New Hire
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
No, there wouldn't be lots of 200%, because the grids would go red after 10-20% (or less) of people tried to drop, but the basic minimum required reserves would still be there. That's why the company has a red line in the first place, to protect them from not having enough reserves.
I believe you don't know your own airlines history. Red/green went to court and was upheld and therefore is rock solid. I do not believe DTZ was put to that same test/experience. I've seen enough incorrect info from you, so I will wait for other NKs to weigh in on that important distinction.
I believe you don't know your own airlines history. Red/green went to court and was upheld and therefore is rock solid. I do not believe DTZ was put to that same test/experience. I've seen enough incorrect info from you, so I will wait for other NKs to weigh in on that important distinction.
#523
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Like I said earlier, grid rules and DTZ are a package deal. Obviously, you can't DTZ if the company doesn't follow the grid rules. They are the same fight.
I don't understand why you keep arguing against pilots – talking about giving up hard won work rules for nothing in the best negotiating environment we've seen in decades. Or in the other thread, advocating for weaker profit sharing language.
I don't understand why you keep arguing against pilots – talking about giving up hard won work rules for nothing in the best negotiating environment we've seen in decades. Or in the other thread, advocating for weaker profit sharing language.
#524
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Switch it up
I hear ya. I'm just not a "work 40 hours a month" kind of guy. Yes, sometimes that's all I work, if I have vacation or burn some PTO, but otherwise that's never been me. So it's just not my fight. You part timers can fight your fight, that's fine. I simply see it as, most likely, something that benefits a fraction of the group. We don't have it here, so somehow 4,950 pilots get by just fine, and I doubt a large proportion of them will suddenly start working/crediting 40 hours a month.
I have, a few times, been denied a trade because my credit would go below 70. So of course I do support some "Drop to XX". But I have no real use for ZERO, so again that's just not my fight, especially if we have to give up something, or give up other GAINS that will be enjoyed by most/all pilots.
I have, a few times, been denied a trade because my credit would go below 70. So of course I do support some "Drop to XX". But I have no real use for ZERO, so again that's just not my fight, especially if we have to give up something, or give up other GAINS that will be enjoyed by most/all pilots.
#525
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Switch it up
You know Blue, I'd question whether you were actually a pilot given how consistently you keep advocating for giving up awesome work rules and/or double-talking yourself into crappy profit sharing formulas. But, then I see 6k+ posts on the forums and I think maybe you've just been Stockholm Syndrome'd into a company man over many years.
#526
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
You know Blue, I'd question whether you were actually a pilot given how consistently you keep advocating for giving up awesome work rules and/or double-talking yourself into crappy profit sharing formulas. But, then I see 6k+ posts on the forums and I think maybe you've just been Stockholm Syndrome'd into a company man over many years.
2. Talking myself into crappy profit sharing formulas? Your argument against me could and should be leveled against nearly all the major airline pilots in the industry, or at a minimum their negotiating committees. What you describe as "crappy", would apply to most existing profit sharing plans at our peer airlines, so you're really just saying you know better than all the negotiating committees who negotiated those contracts. That's not just a little arrogant... And it's even more rich from a guy a few months into his NK career, who does not have, and never has had a profit sharing plan at your airline. So keep on telling us how much more you know than the committees who negotiated those plans, and the pilots who have been cashing those checks. They'd love to know how crappy they are and how much better you could have done...
3. As long as we're talking about profit sharing, you were just telling me on the other board how JB pilots can't have profit sharing because JB is a "growth" company and that the plan wouldn't pay anyway because of the accounting methods available to growth companies. Well, JB is only ~23 years old, has been a growth company it's entire existence, and for much of that existence it did IN FACT have a profit sharing plan, and there were several years where the checks were quite large. So, what that means, is I don't have to wonder if you have a clue, you've already proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you do not.
#527
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
#528
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Switch it up
I was (apparently poorly) trying to explain to you the holes in the current formulas, how the company can manipulate them to payout less, and suggested a better method to calculate profit sharing. But, you didn't get it because you don't know the first thing about corporate accounting.
#529
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Gross mischaracterization. Which is rich considering you accused me of EAASL. Are you sure YOU can read English?
I was (apparently poorly) trying to explain to you the holes in the current formulas, how the company can manipulate them to payout less, and suggested a better method to calculate profit sharing. But, you didn't get it because you don't know the first thing about corporate accounting.
I was (apparently poorly) trying to explain to you the holes in the current formulas, how the company can manipulate them to payout less, and suggested a better method to calculate profit sharing. But, you didn't get it because you don't know the first thing about corporate accounting.
#530
Let me try and clarify a few things.
With regards to DTZ, it’s less about dropping everything and staying at zero. It’s more about being ABLE to drop everything and adjusting your schedule to how you want it.
Example: I was awarded a really bad relief line in another base coming off OE (boarder line offensive, really). I was able to drop everything except one holiday weekend. I rebuilt my schedule in my preferred base well above guarantee. That one holiday weekend I couldn’t drop? I swapped it out for a 3 day that had a double overnight in my preferred base and it was front end and back end commutable.
Bluedriver mentioned maybe dropping to 40 or 50. Logical on the surface, but let me address this as I’m sure he’s not the only one thinking this. One of the issues I have with this is that once something is given up, it’s rarely given back. The other reason this is a bad idea is because it creates a credit threshold restriction. A few pages back, Bluedriver (not trying to pick on you, you just mentioned earlier) couldn’t drop a trip because it would bring him below the credit threshold. Not ideal especially if you have to go in for multiple times to add/drop/swap request on an 8000+ pilot group.
Pay has also been brought up here. No question JB pilots earn more hourly than NK pilots. The reality is that our grid rules, DTZ, etc.. all play a role in us getting to credit a ton a month. This allows us to be paid less hourly, but credit more bringing us up to comparable pay rates.
From personal experience, I’m on track to earn six figures at the end of year one. That includes 3 months of training pay (1 month on the new rate).
Someone else asked how many people DTZ and camp premium. I know of 4 people who do it. In practice, you have to be flexible and ready to go whenever a call comes through. The way premium works here doesn’t allow for this strategy to be sustainable all year long. If you’re at the bottom of the list, you probably won’t be called. This forces you to work an awarded (and subsequently adjusted) schedule. DTZ is about schedule flexibility and less about waiting for the call for premium trips.
Some of the cons of DTZ AND OUR GRID RULES is that reserve pilots gets shorted. Reserve pilots can’t add/drop/swap. They can only pick up reserve assignment from other pilots from the trade board (can’t interfere with 117, of course. It also pays above guarantee), and can list for the XY list (this is where our 4 GDO days come in handy). These reserve rules is what allows the grid to be green though. It forces adequate coverage on most days. We also get to bid for specific reserve periods (something that doesn’t happen at JB?). So bid what you want and more times than not you get your 1st or 2nd preferred reserve period.
So that’s the spark notes version of it and some of y’all might be asking “so why would anyone leave?” That’s a good question. Some people don’t want to commute. Some people don’t want to stick around for the merger. Some people live in large legacy bases where they know won’t be shutdown. Other people are young and have their shot at pretty much any legacy they want. If you were to be in your mid 20s and could basically choose what legacy you work for, would you stay for the merger? I mention this because a large majority of our attrition are are from 1st-2nd year pilots.
One thing to mention that gets skipped over on APC is that our 4 GDO days guarantees you at least a week or two off in the month. So that’s something we should definitely keep!
I know a lot of our pilots are happy here. We get paid well, have excellent QOL, have good layovers, fly with awesome crews, have amazing CPs, and the company pretty much leaves us alone for the most part.
Hope this helped!
With regards to DTZ, it’s less about dropping everything and staying at zero. It’s more about being ABLE to drop everything and adjusting your schedule to how you want it.
Example: I was awarded a really bad relief line in another base coming off OE (boarder line offensive, really). I was able to drop everything except one holiday weekend. I rebuilt my schedule in my preferred base well above guarantee. That one holiday weekend I couldn’t drop? I swapped it out for a 3 day that had a double overnight in my preferred base and it was front end and back end commutable.
Bluedriver mentioned maybe dropping to 40 or 50. Logical on the surface, but let me address this as I’m sure he’s not the only one thinking this. One of the issues I have with this is that once something is given up, it’s rarely given back. The other reason this is a bad idea is because it creates a credit threshold restriction. A few pages back, Bluedriver (not trying to pick on you, you just mentioned earlier) couldn’t drop a trip because it would bring him below the credit threshold. Not ideal especially if you have to go in for multiple times to add/drop/swap request on an 8000+ pilot group.
Pay has also been brought up here. No question JB pilots earn more hourly than NK pilots. The reality is that our grid rules, DTZ, etc.. all play a role in us getting to credit a ton a month. This allows us to be paid less hourly, but credit more bringing us up to comparable pay rates.
From personal experience, I’m on track to earn six figures at the end of year one. That includes 3 months of training pay (1 month on the new rate).
Someone else asked how many people DTZ and camp premium. I know of 4 people who do it. In practice, you have to be flexible and ready to go whenever a call comes through. The way premium works here doesn’t allow for this strategy to be sustainable all year long. If you’re at the bottom of the list, you probably won’t be called. This forces you to work an awarded (and subsequently adjusted) schedule. DTZ is about schedule flexibility and less about waiting for the call for premium trips.
Some of the cons of DTZ AND OUR GRID RULES is that reserve pilots gets shorted. Reserve pilots can’t add/drop/swap. They can only pick up reserve assignment from other pilots from the trade board (can’t interfere with 117, of course. It also pays above guarantee), and can list for the XY list (this is where our 4 GDO days come in handy). These reserve rules is what allows the grid to be green though. It forces adequate coverage on most days. We also get to bid for specific reserve periods (something that doesn’t happen at JB?). So bid what you want and more times than not you get your 1st or 2nd preferred reserve period.
So that’s the spark notes version of it and some of y’all might be asking “so why would anyone leave?” That’s a good question. Some people don’t want to commute. Some people don’t want to stick around for the merger. Some people live in large legacy bases where they know won’t be shutdown. Other people are young and have their shot at pretty much any legacy they want. If you were to be in your mid 20s and could basically choose what legacy you work for, would you stay for the merger? I mention this because a large majority of our attrition are are from 1st-2nd year pilots.
One thing to mention that gets skipped over on APC is that our 4 GDO days guarantees you at least a week or two off in the month. So that’s something we should definitely keep!
I know a lot of our pilots are happy here. We get paid well, have excellent QOL, have good layovers, fly with awesome crews, have amazing CPs, and the company pretty much leaves us alone for the most part.
Hope this helped!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



