Search
Notices

LOA17 is out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2022, 06:08 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 983
Default

Let me go check out BluePilots. I’m sure they’re losing their minds over there 😅
Roy Biggins is offline  
Old 03-10-2022, 06:36 PM
  #42  
Covfefe
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins View Post
I tend to agree with what you’re saying here, but why don’t our reps (191)? What are we missing? This just feels demoralizing.
I don’t want to speak for them. They will put out a comm I think, or at least express their opinions at the roadshow. But I’ve spoken to one of them, and my assessment of what he said is he doesn’t think it’s necessarily a great deal, but voted to send it to the group for a variety of reasons. But, I’ll let them speak for themselves on the matter.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 03:22 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
arbitrator doesn’t issue awards. He rules on whether or not it’s a contract violation. That’s it. Then if it’s rules that way, company fights it and it goes to federal court. He can’t just say “ok here’s 6.9% instead.”
The courts have consistently refused to intervene in matters dealing with the RLA and arbitrations.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 03:24 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
I don’t want to speak for them. They will put out a comm I think, or at least express their opinions at the roadshow. But I’ve spoken to one of them, and my assessment of what he said is he doesn’t think it’s necessarily a great deal, but voted to send it to the group for a variety of reasons. But, I’ll let them speak for themselves on the matter.

Holding it close to the vest until they can give us the used car salesman "roadshow experience"? Its a dead giveaway that they know its a terrible deal. Now they are gonna try to scare you into voting for it. (It will be fear based because there aren't a lot of positives here.) This shouldn't have been released to the members. If the arbitator wants to nullifying faith in all CBAs by allowing a plain text violation of one, then let him. At least then we will KNOW where we stand and it won't be us f###ing ourselves.

I would vote to join ALPA again in a heartbeat, but our union absolutely blows.
MainlineFlyer is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 03:50 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,211
Default

Originally Posted by MainlineFlyer View Post
Holding it close to the vest until they can give us the used car salesman "roadshow experience"? Its a dead giveaway that they know its a terrible deal. Now they are gonna try to scare you into voting for it. (It will be fear based because there aren't a lot of positives here.) This shouldn't have been released to the members. If the arbitator wants to nullifying faith in all CBAs by allowing a plain text violation of one, then let him. At least then we will KNOW where we stand and it won't be us f###ing ourselves.

I would vote to join ALPA again in a heartbeat, but our union absolutely blows.
I think the arbitrator states in his memo that a "cease and desist order" would be a remedy specifically with regards to Focus City to Focus city and Focus City to international in-range destinations. Also damages are on the table, but there won't be any amending of pay scales. A "no" will not result in the arbitrator canceling the NEA nor will it be the arbitrator awarding us a 8% bump to keep in line with inflation. (I'm not sure where you guys think inflation has some part in this...). A "no" would more likely (as he states) stopping those specific flights, the NEA living on, and a few million to us as damages. The company hasn't made billions and billions off of it.
Softpayman is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 04:26 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stanherman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Hack pilot
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
I don’t want to speak for them. They will put out a comm I think, or at least express their opinions at the roadshow. But I’ve spoken to one of them, and my assessment of what he said is he doesn’t think it’s necessarily a great deal, but voted to send it to the group for a variety of reasons. But, I’ll let them speak for themselves on the matter.
And here lies the exact problem which fuels my disdain for ALPA. Elected reps believe it might not be a good enough deal for the pilot group, yet send it out for a membership vote anyway; completely nullifying and washing their hands of any responsibility in what happens after.
stanherman is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 04:44 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default

The pilot group is in a terrible position, that’s been brought about by continued mistakes of our current MEC chairman.


The only lesson to learn from this is that CK has to be removed.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 05:26 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
IAFDOF's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Position: Airline Employee
Posts: 366
Default

What a shame. The results of this TA were a preview into contract negotiations and I am, erm, underwhelmed. An extra $150 a month and a taxed-down-to-nothing bonus isn’t going to make or break me, but a bad long-term contract will. No vote!
IAFDOF is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 05:29 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 331
Default

Originally Posted by Softpayman View Post
I. (I'm not sure where you guys think inflation has some part in this...)..

Because inflation is up 8% over the past year (when the NEA was in effect). We are stuck on our current wages without the ability to get a raise. CBA2 could take years.

It would have been nice to at least mitigate the inflation of the past year and break even. Are you content with a paycut?
panpanpan is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 06:35 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,211
Default

Originally Posted by panpanpan View Post
Because inflation is up 8% over the past year (when the NEA was in effect). We are stuck on our current wages without the ability to get a raise. CBA2 could take years.

It would have been nice to at least mitigate the inflation of the past year and break even. Are you content with a paycut?
I'm paid the amount I agreed to, my pay hasn't been cut. Our purchasing power has gone down. Now ok, you'd like to remedy the situation by using the NEA arbitration as a vehicle to do so. That's fine. But i don't see the two as inherently connected. Read the arbitrators email and tell me how we see 8% via the process we're in at the moment? I just don't see it.
Softpayman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices