Search

Notices

LAX base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2022 | 06:34 AM
  #61  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,261
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
LAS-SDQ is a bit of a stretch for the 320ceo, therefore we will completely walk away from any LAS operation.
A lot of elderly 320ceos are either going to be retired or confined to the East Coast is my guess. By the time the merger of the two companies actually occurs, there’ll be well over 100 320 NEOs.
Reply
Old 10-18-2022 | 06:44 AM
  #62  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
A lot of elderly 320ceos are either going to be retired or confined to the East Coast is my guess. By the time the merger of the two companies actually occurs, there’ll be well over 100 320 NEOs.
He's making an inside BlueJet joke. He's not actually projecting the complete demise of LAS.
Reply
Old 10-18-2022 | 07:12 AM
  #63  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 48
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
He's making an inside BlueJet joke. He's not actually projecting the complete demise of LAS.
😂 Yes, for the record I think a LAS base would be smart. The LAX and SFO areas are well covered with direct flights to the east coast, but an America West type of late night LAS “sort hub” to the east coast could work for a lot of secondary/tertiary west coast cities.

Originally Posted by Excargodog
A lot of elderly 320ceos are either going to be retired or confined to the East Coast is my guess. By the time the merger of the two companies actually occurs, there’ll be well over 100 320 NEOs.
Agreed, those older 320ceos will be used to grow the SDQ fortress hub. 23x daily SDQ-STI flights, all departing in the redeye period. 😉
Reply
Old 10-18-2022 | 10:07 PM
  #64  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDeSpacito
Just by looking at some flight trackers I see that

10 flights LAX - JFK: 1 redeye
5 flights LAX - BOS: 1 redeye
4 flights LAX - EWR: 1 redeye
3 flights LAX - FLL: 1 redeye

So there seems to be a a fair amount of day flying. Are the ones doing all the day flying mostly guys from other bases or just the top seniority guys in LAX?
Yes the day flying is (when I was still there) almost entirely done by the guys from the east coast. Not sure about the schedules you saw, what I'm seeing for Thurs night this week are available to book through myidtravel:

LAX - JFK 22:55, 23:59

ONT - JFK 23:35 (this is usually built into the LAX pairings starting with a limo/dh to ONT)

LAX - BOS 20:50, 23:45

LAX - BUF 23:15

LAX - FLL 22:04

LAX - MIA 21:50

LAX - EWR 22:32

LAX - BDL 20:45


So that's 10 redeye departures in one night (9 if you don't count ONT, though I limo'd out there to start that sequence 4 times one month.)

Some other pairings will go LAX-SFO-JFK leaving around 1900 from LAX, doing the 2230(ish) departure from SFO. SLC, and LAS, were also built into pairings like that.

Basically with 100 lines in LAX, 10% of your lineholders start a redeye trip on this Thursday night.

At least that's how it was before I retired at the beginning of the year. I can't say things haven't changed, but I'm skeptical that they would have.
Reply
Old 10-19-2022 | 05:01 AM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by DMH1967
Yes the day flying is (when I was still there) almost entirely done by the guys from the east coast. Not sure about the schedules you saw, what I'm seeing for Thurs night this week are available to book through myidtravel:

LAX - JFK 22:55, 23:59

ONT - JFK 23:35 (this is usually built into the LAX pairings starting with a limo/dh to ONT)

LAX - BOS 20:50, 23:45

LAX - BUF 23:15

LAX - FLL 22:04

LAX - MIA 21:50

LAX - EWR 22:32

LAX - BDL 20:45


So that's 10 redeye departures in one night (9 if you don't count ONT, though I limo'd out there to start that sequence 4 times one month.)

Some other pairings will go LAX-SFO-JFK leaving around 1900 from LAX, doing the 2230(ish) departure from SFO. SLC, and LAS, were also built into pairings like that.

Basically with 100 lines in LAX, 10% of your lineholders start a redeye trip on this Thursday night.

At least that's how it was before I retired at the beginning of the year. I can't say things haven't changed, but I'm skeptical that they would have.
[Insert ooooofffffff GIF here]
[And here]
[And here]
[And here]
​​​​​​​[Oh...and here]
Reply
Old 10-19-2022 | 07:59 AM
  #66  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 369
Likes: 10
Default

Couple years down the road after the spirit acquisition is worked in:

LAX flying SHOULD be a lot better right?
Reply
Old 10-19-2022 | 08:52 AM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
Couple years down the road after the spirit acquisition is worked in:

LAX flying SHOULD be a lot better right?
Yes, I would think so.
Reply
Old 10-19-2022 | 08:54 AM
  #68  
CanoeBum's Avatar
PermaFO
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: May I swing the gear Von Admiral?
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
Couple years down the road after the spirit acquisition is worked in:

LAX flying SHOULD be a lot better right?
Couple years? This must be your first airline merger. Spirit does a LAX PIT redeye so I guess shorter is better
Reply
Old 10-19-2022 | 09:46 AM
  #69  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 48
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum
Couple years down the road after the spirit acquisition is worked in:

LAX flying SHOULD be a lot better right?
I wouldn't hold my breath honestly. Real estate at LAX is valuable and we use it for premium transcon Mint stuff. Schedules will improve from our point of view with a lot of short haul intra-west coast type of flying added (LGB operation was better in this regard). I could see LAS fitting that bill better than LAX.
Reply
Old 07-25-2023 | 05:58 PM
  #70  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default

Someone asked about LAX in another thread, so I thought I could bump this one up. Reading through it is mostly still decent info.
Supplemental bid results have junior Captain as a 3/16 hire. Junior FO was a 6/23 hire. At 14 months I’m bidding 67% in the right seat with 25 (of 149 total lines) line-holders and 24 reserves below me.

Still a lot of red-eyes, but the bid package for August had the latest takeoff at 22:34, so maybe the company is backing off from the real late red-eyes, which are rough. Flying is generally easy with many trips with one leg per day.

Company recently approached the union about giving relief from CBA restrictions to open a LAS base, which the union did not entertain. The company could open a LAS base anytime though and the upcoming (1 Aug) annual bud could be the time. A LAS base would be a major seniority shakeup in LAX. We have many (over a dozen) Captains who live there already and many commuters will consider it. Spirit merger would change things much further. Hawaii flying pushed until 2024 or later due to Airbus delivery delays.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
prior121
Mesa Airlines
53
02-26-2014 06:15 PM
flyingfarmer
United
32
03-01-2012 05:04 AM
FlyHigh423
Major
39
10-23-2011 05:46 PM
trashhauler
Cargo
7
01-27-2007 04:22 PM
ShadowFlight
Fractional
3
12-05-2006 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices