TA Reached
#491
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
#492
On Reserve
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 81
Likes: 3
From: FO
They won’t say it’s DTZ or profit sharing because one is way more valuable to the company than the other.
If the company is interested in giving us something of substantial value for drop to zero, of course, we would consider. But a JetBlue pilot telling spirit pilots to give up their superior QOL provisions so JetBlue pilots can pursue priorities that they weren’t able to get on their own is a bad look. And yes, there’s lots that we couldn’t get on our own either. But we aren’t asking you for concessions to pursue our priorities.
The base case should be a combination of the best pay provisions of the B6 contract and the best QOL/premium pay provisions of the NK contract. After that, we can pursue other priorities.
If the company is interested in giving us something of substantial value for drop to zero, of course, we would consider. But a JetBlue pilot telling spirit pilots to give up their superior QOL provisions so JetBlue pilots can pursue priorities that they weren’t able to get on their own is a bad look. And yes, there’s lots that we couldn’t get on our own either. But we aren’t asking you for concessions to pursue our priorities.
The base case should be a combination of the best pay provisions of the B6 contract and the best QOL/premium pay provisions of the NK contract. After that, we can pursue other priorities.
#494
For repetition’s sake, B6 pilots would love to have DTZ but only if rules about our reserve grid and VDA are overhauled to allow everyone to use DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
#495
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
For repetition’s sake, B6 pilots would love to have DTZ but only if rules about our reserve grid and VDA are overhauled to allow everyone to use DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
#496
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 139
Likes: 1
From: A320 FO
For repetition’s sake, B6 pilots would love to have DTZ but only if rules about our reserve grid and VDA are overhauled to allow everyone to use DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
#497
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
For repetition’s sake, B6 pilots would love to have DTZ but only if rules about our reserve grid and VDA are overhauled to allow everyone to use DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
Using today’s B6 grid system and VDA priority, DTZ will only advantage the top few percent of pilots and screw over the majority of the pilot group.
Since these rule changes would require substantial pilot hiring costs for no increase in pilot productivity, the company will place a certain dollar value on these improvements - value that will have to come from some other section of the JCBA. This is the reason for resistance. Not because B6 pilots wouldn’t want DTZ.
#498
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: 320 F.O.
You are confusing two separate issues. They can't drop to zero either, unless the grid is green. They have better grid rules, which I and everyone else wants as well.
You can have better grid rules with or without drop to zero.
You are a self professed lady of the night when it comes to VDA/premium, I understand full well why you might want a wide open schedule, and it's not to take time off.
I am 100% fine with DTZ, unless and until the NC is forced to trim something from the counter offer, and it better not be great stuff for the majority in exchange for this lady-of-the-night tool for the few.
You can have better grid rules with or without drop to zero.
You are a self professed lady of the night when it comes to VDA/premium, I understand full well why you might want a wide open schedule, and it's not to take time off.
I am 100% fine with DTZ, unless and until the NC is forced to trim something from the counter offer, and it better not be great stuff for the majority in exchange for this lady-of-the-night tool for the few.
#499
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
VDA doesn’t benefit me more then 2 or 3 times a year and it never will. Yes I VDA every day off I don’t have something going on but I get about 3 a year. I don’t want DTZ for that reason I want DTZ for the QOL improvement. The VDA approach sprint has would have to come along with DTZ. The current JB system benefits a handful of people and I will never be one of them. Yes the grid needs an overhaul but DTZ should be part of our JCBA as well.
#500
I don’t understand your fears or your concerns over the cost of it. Yeah, the company will have to add a few more people on reserve. They will need to do that regardless if there are going to have to be ANY improvements in the grid and after the latest Christmas WN IROPS disaster ALL airlines are probably going to have to do that anyway because of proposals coming out of DOT and Congress that will hold the airline responsible for hotels, per diem, and every other expense on ticketed passengers denied boarding for any reason that isn’t unequivocally an act of war or an act of God. But those people added will be the cheapest people, new hire FOs and the most junior CAs, so the hit from managements perspective won’t be as bad as it might have been.
From the presently employed pilot’s perspective, that’s that many more pilots JUNIOR TO YOU, which never hurts. For the new hires it’s an opportunity and for the new CAs it’s a chance to upgrade sooner.
From the JB pilots perspective, the whole buyout is a hell of a good deal IMHO. You get a bunch of new pilots in a group that in the aggregate is junior to you - that’s a win, a bunch of newer aircraft and a huge order book of aircraft that will dramatically lower your fleet age and a bunch of new bases. I’m not exactly sure why your so paranoid that someone is going to put something over on you. Did you have a real $hitty childhood or what?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



