TA voting is open
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: fifi whisperer
Posts: 1,255
I think we view things very differently and that’s okay. It’s hard for me to see your point of view, and I do honesty feel like you are in the minority here.
I hope, for many reasons, that this passes and we can fight hard in the JBCA for better pay (with the aid of pattern bargaining) and true profit sharing.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 418
I think they would take it into summer and beyond…. And so does the union.
I think we view things very differently and that’s okay. It’s hard for me to see your point of view, and I do honesty feel like you are in the minority here.
I hope, for many reasons, that this passes and we can fight hard in the JBCA for better pay (with the aid of pattern bargaining) and true profit sharing.
I think we view things very differently and that’s okay. It’s hard for me to see your point of view, and I do honesty feel like you are in the minority here.
I hope, for many reasons, that this passes and we can fight hard in the JBCA for better pay (with the aid of pattern bargaining) and true profit sharing.
So you hope this passes so you can fight hard in the JCBA for stuff you could easily fight for right now…why not fight now? Especially since there will be a LOT of things needed to be fought for. Why not do some heavy lifting now, so that it’s less of a haul over the next 3-5 years slugging it out with two dissimilar pilot groups who each have their own priorities. Spirit guys will make white shirts, karbon jackets, and DTZ their hill to die on, jetblue guys will make bottom of the peer set pay their hill, and 6-9 pilots will be screaming for profit sharing. They’ll get 50% of the desired items in the JCBA, call it a win, and say the next time will be where the leverage is.
There’s leverage now. It’s always next time. Make it now.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 917
I agreed with the union’s strategy, right up until they agreed to a very substandard agreement (which failed to achieve one of the main pillars “because they said no, again”) right on the cusp of pulling one of the multiple remaining levers, right before Christmas. And yes, the reps and the NC absolutely know how I feel, but they assure me they will get them next time.
I don’t think a recall would be necessary (although it’s needed, I’d support them staying in place thru this extension). All they’d need to do is make a better contract comparison guide (one with profit sharing), re-poll, raise some numbers, and re-engage. Education/polling could be done by end of feb. Maybe into March. March/April/May is plenty of time for a very limited agreement.
Some reps would (and should) resign…those special elections could be done thru feb and March.
Chris Kenney would hopefully be recalled and replaced, and that could happen in feb-March, but union business could continue in the meantime.
Even if a shakeup were to occur in feb/March/April, it’s such a a limited negotiation that it could easily be done in 1-2 sessions. There aren’t many items to discuss. It’s just numbers being handed back and forth across the table. When there’s a deadline, they work really quickly. This last agreement didn’t take hours and hours of haggling until the last day or two. It was meet, exchange proposals, get a response a week or two later, evaluate, exchange another proposal, etc. They had until holiday time to get something done (basically the line in the sand when the labor dispute was to occur). Summer starts in June. That’s the next part in the timeline it would be done by (or not). And I’m 99% confident the company wouldn’t take it into the summer.
I don’t think a recall would be necessary (although it’s needed, I’d support them staying in place thru this extension). All they’d need to do is make a better contract comparison guide (one with profit sharing), re-poll, raise some numbers, and re-engage. Education/polling could be done by end of feb. Maybe into March. March/April/May is plenty of time for a very limited agreement.
Some reps would (and should) resign…those special elections could be done thru feb and March.
Chris Kenney would hopefully be recalled and replaced, and that could happen in feb-March, but union business could continue in the meantime.
Even if a shakeup were to occur in feb/March/April, it’s such a a limited negotiation that it could easily be done in 1-2 sessions. There aren’t many items to discuss. It’s just numbers being handed back and forth across the table. When there’s a deadline, they work really quickly. This last agreement didn’t take hours and hours of haggling until the last day or two. It was meet, exchange proposals, get a response a week or two later, evaluate, exchange another proposal, etc. They had until holiday time to get something done (basically the line in the sand when the labor dispute was to occur). Summer starts in June. That’s the next part in the timeline it would be done by (or not). And I’m 99% confident the company wouldn’t take it into the summer.
I have posed this questions on here before... who do you think will run for MEC Chairman? Who will run for NC or LEC reps? Do you know how many step up on average and how many participate in the election process?
There is always a lot of talk about recalls and replacing, but who is stepping up to replace?
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 418
You have no idea wtf you are talking about and I can tell from your previous posts you have no idea how an MEC functions or how the process works.
I have posed this questions on here before... who do you think will run for MEC Chairman? Who will run for NC or LEC reps? Do you know how many step up on average and how many participate in the election process?
There is always a lot of talk about recalls and replacing, but who is stepping up to replace?
I have posed this questions on here before... who do you think will run for MEC Chairman? Who will run for NC or LEC reps? Do you know how many step up on average and how many participate in the election process?
There is always a lot of talk about recalls and replacing, but who is stepping up to replace?
#35
Bluediver the REAL deal
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 327
It’s funny to me how different people view things.
As I said, I’m a yes vote. Everyone I’ve talked to in person is voting yes. But when I come on the message board everyone is saying they are a no vote.
honest question, why would you vote no?
If we vote no, the company likely will just pursue regular negotiations—- giving up a ton of short term financial gains and would likely result in no agreement until the JBCA.
I think the union did a good job answering why they didn’t push profit sharing. Sounds like the snap up clause might actually trigger as well.
interestingly, and please correct me if I’m wrong, but many of the vocal no voters on this sight very vocal no voters for the CBA?
As I said, I’m a yes vote. Everyone I’ve talked to in person is voting yes. But when I come on the message board everyone is saying they are a no vote.
honest question, why would you vote no?
If we vote no, the company likely will just pursue regular negotiations—- giving up a ton of short term financial gains and would likely result in no agreement until the JBCA.
I think the union did a good job answering why they didn’t push profit sharing. Sounds like the snap up clause might actually trigger as well.
interestingly, and please correct me if I’m wrong, but many of the vocal no voters on this sight very vocal no voters for the CBA?
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 983
I’m not even gonna lie, I came away a No after that also. I was a reluctant yes before. I was in fact “hedging my bet’. After yesterday I’m a No. I also sent a question in and wasn’t satisfied with the answer. I have serious concerns with this group taking us into the JCBA.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 418
I’m not even gonna lie, I came away a No after that also. I was a reluctant yes before. I was in fact “hedging my bet’. After yesterday I’m a No. I also sent a question in and wasn’t satisfied with the answer. I have serious concerns with this group taking us into the JCBA.
In all seriousness, I was hoping my mind would be changed through the course of road shows and Q&As. Prior to those though, I had numerous discussions with reps and negotiators, so I wasn’t optimistic anything could be said in a more public event than I got one on one.
I’ve somewhat resigned myself to the idea that this passes overwhelmingly, and I have held out hope that they really will get them next time. But yesterday was especially disturbing, and I think regardless of the outcome, the 4 from that Q&A need to go prior to JCBA negotiations. I have zero faith in them being able to achieve anything of significant value. I think that’s one reason I’m such a hard no now. If they can’t get really anything this go round, and are not only satisfied with it, but selling it, and agreed right before delta’s TA to much lower rates, then there ought to be 4,800 pilots concerned about their future they are negotiating.
#38
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,881
Scary and pathetic.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post