![]() |
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3806548)
So, they should go away because YOU don’t like them? Very few people get “stuck” with 5-days. Some commuters like them because they can do three commutable 5-days and be done for the month. The better option is to try and tailor the amount of commutable trips and day trips to the desires of the pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by Wasntme
(Post 3806608)
I commuted for 6 yrs and didn’t fly 5 days. There is no reason why junior pilots should get stuck with them in the bid. If they were any good that wouldn’t happen. Stack a 2 and a 3 day together. There ya go.
|
Originally Posted by Wasntme
(Post 3806608)
I commuted for 6 yrs and didn’t fly 5 days. There is no reason why junior pilots should get stuck with them in the bid. If they were any good that wouldn’t happen. Stack a 2 and a 3 day together. There ya go.
|
Originally Posted by Softpayman
(Post 3806378)
First in saying I'm cautiously optimistic regarding "Pairing enhancements."
Perhaps despite being more costly on paper they'll have the opportunity to see savings in other aspects ie improved reliablity, less broken pairings etc. |
Originally Posted by Tornado875
(Post 3806437)
Super ass
|
Originally Posted by Wasntme
(Post 3806608)
I commuted for 6 yrs and didn’t fly 5 days. There is no reason why junior pilots should get stuck with them in the bid. If they were any good that wouldn’t happen. Stack a 2 and a 3 day together. There ya go.
|
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3806397)
It feels like they're about to pi$$ on our back and tell us it's raining. Commuters certainly are not going to like this.
Company: Pilots don’t want in base layovers. Company Planners: No problem, shorter trips and not paying for hotels as well? Reliability goes up. Genius. Why didn’t we think of that a couple years ago? Pilots: Dammit more nights in a Crashpad? This is B.S. |
Originally Posted by Bluediver
(Post 3806765)
Pilots : In base layovers are B.S.
Company: Pilots don’t want in base layovers. Company Planners: No problem, shorter trips and not paying for hotels as well? Reliability goes up. Genius. Why didn’t we think of that a couple years ago? Pilots: Dammit more nights in a Crashpad? This is B.S. |
Originally Posted by Bluediver
(Post 3806765)
Pilots : In base layovers are B.S.
Company: Pilots don’t want in base layovers. Company Planners: No problem, shorter trips and not paying for hotels as well? Reliability goes up. Genius. Why didn’t we think of that a couple years ago? Pilots: Dammit more nights in a Crashpad? This is B.S. |
Originally Posted by Tornado875
(Post 3806779)
I'm definitely the minority that likes in base layovers. Now all of my layovers are in New York a city I detest.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:21 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands