Search

Notices

Lounges

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2025 | 04:53 AM
  #21  
.
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 592
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Lots of connections to be made yes, but the point was we had previously focused on business more than we do now. The previous poster said we never focused on business travel, which is the point I disagreed with.
Ah yes, that’s is what I get for reading the headline and not the quote. Carry on.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 05:23 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 200
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Pre pandemic we did have more focus on BOS based business contracts. Now… not so much.
Coming out of the pandemic, there was a push to increase BOS departures to 200 a day. But that went on the back burner as soon as they signed onto the NEA and hasn’t been discussed since.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 05:47 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 234
Likes: 1
Default

Having lounges and first class could also be a trigger that allows us to join an alliance which would be very good for us.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 06:02 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Combatcraig
Having lounges and first class could also be a trigger that allows us to join an alliance which would be very good for us.
Agreed Craig. With some type of route network, and adding mini Mint, this could make JB viable. I still don’t fully understand what this United Bluesky partnership will look like. Neither does Union apparently.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 06:15 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 107
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
Agreed Craig. With some type of route network, and adding mini Mint, this could make JB viable. I still don’t fully understand what this United Bluesky partnership will look like. Neither does Union apparently.
United will feed JB just enough biz to keep them in biz long enough for UAL to reestablish their foot back into JFK, then they will put the screws to JB in some future move when they tire of the competition and are ready to make a go of it on their own.

Sorta like the chickens accepting a wolf in the henhouse believing it will help defend them from the pack of wolves waiting to pounce, until the wolf gets hungry. JB's better play would have to done what it could to keep another competitor out of JFK to the best of their ability. Then if UAL wanted back in JFK bad enough, at least demand entry into star alliance for allowing them to invade your home hub.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 06:32 AM
  #26  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2025
Posts: 63
Likes: 23
Default

Originally Posted by avi8orco
if it sells enough mint and makes people feel special enough to get and blow money on the credit card, I don’t care if it looks like a cross between the lobby of the Verdanza, a hooka bar, and a Golden Corral.

As long as it somehow by a miracle keeps this place afloat and my paycheck from bouncing, I couldn’t care less what it looks like.
Golden Hooka Verdanza. Now that’s a name for a garage band! Now playing in terminal 5.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 08:00 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 516
Likes: 86
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
Agreed Craig. With some type of route network, and adding mini Mint, this could make JB viable. I still don’t fully understand what this United Bluesky partnership will look like. Neither does Union apparently.
The frustration is that so many of us on the line have been talking about "Mini Mint" or "Junior Mint" since the 220 was announced many years ago. We all said that airplane should have first class seating to accompany the Mint 321s, but nope. The company stated loud and clear that there would be no first class in the 220s. Now? They're scrambling to retrofit and offer a product that literally every single pilot on the line said we should have. These are the things that drives people like myself nuts.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 08:39 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by AYLflyer
The frustration is that so many of us on the line have been talking about "Mini Mint" or "Junior Mint" since the 220 was announced many years ago. We all said that airplane should have first class seating to accompany the Mint 321s, but nope. The company stated loud and clear that there would be no first class in the 220s. Now? They're scrambling to retrofit and offer a product that literally every single pilot on the line said we should have. These are the things that drives people like myself nuts.
No lies detected here.
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 08:40 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by nene
United will feed JB just enough biz to keep them in biz long enough for UAL to reestablish their foot back into JFK, then they will put the screws to JB in some future move when they tire of the competition and are ready to make a go of it on their own.

Sorta like the chickens accepting a wolf in the henhouse believing it will help defend them from the pack of wolves waiting to pounce, until the wolf gets hungry. JB's better play would have to done what it could to keep another competitor out of JFK to the best of their ability. Then if UAL wanted back in JFK bad enough, at least demand entry into star alliance for allowing them to invade your home hub.
So you must have read the agreement that no one else is privy to? 😂 You have quite the imagination Nene
Reply
Old 12-16-2025 | 09:02 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 761
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
London - 18 flights a week.
Dingo - 270 flights a week.
No comparison.
You think this lounge is for our flights to SDQ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
khergan
Southwest
443
01-14-2026 09:49 AM
Counselor
Hangar Talk
4
10-26-2009 05:44 AM
AAL763
Hangar Talk
24
09-12-2008 09:15 AM
fedupbusdriver
Cargo
6
07-06-2008 07:04 PM
AAL763
Hangar Talk
2
03-11-2008 06:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices