Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
The difference? The pay... >

The difference? The pay...

Search
Notices

The difference? The pay...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2006, 06:25 AM
  #11  
Baba Bluey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And the chest beating about how much he made at FedEx in 3...2...1...
 
Old 01-03-2006, 07:41 AM
  #12  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
Plus, Jet Blue has profit sharing. Gotta have profits to have profit sharing. Did I mention that their stock is actually worth something? That helps the old W-2 as well. And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour? A six figure income not including the aforementioned extras. Maybe I'm just not greedy enough but it sounds like a great career to me.

"Race to the bottom" is such ALPA bull****. If $100,000k+/yr is the bottom I'm diving in.
I'm curious about your profit sharing, is it related to the stock you get?? How does that work??
............And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour?..............
Nothing, how about $50 an hour?? why noy $25?? If you work enough hours $25 is a great deal Lets see, every hour over 70 at $37.50, wow you could be making real money.
The point is, pilots did make more, consideribly more before, and now they don't. Trust me, if you think what you make is good, than someone will test the water's to see at what point you still..........."dive in"

Just remember your not making $100,000 + because of your great looks, landing ability or modest ego's Your making it because an ALPA pilot was willing (and paid to) to help set the standard you guys are helping to undermine.
dckozak is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 07:46 AM
  #13  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Arrow

Originally Posted by Baba Bluey
And the chest beating about how much he made at FedEx in 3...2...1...
I'll leave it to you guy's to boast to your buddies how much you make. I'v seen the boasting on this forum. I'm waiting for the Fo's to boast about making, "over fifty dollars an hour!!!
dckozak is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 09:02 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain_drew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: FredEx Captain-Retired
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
Plus, Jet Blue has profit sharing. Gotta have profits to have profit sharing. Did I mention that their stock is actually worth something? That helps the old W-2 as well.
Opps!! What is that ‘flushing’ sound? Someone didn’t tell the ‘Analysts’ on Wall Street (http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=JBLU) that you guys are depending on this as part of your low rent airline ‘package’. NOW the stock is whirling around in the toilet vortex . . . just like industry wages, which you have significantly helped to drag down.

Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour? A six figure income not including the aforementioned extras. Maybe I'm just not greedy enough but it sounds like a great career to me.
Yeah. . a damn NYC bus driver makes that too! You people are pitiful, in HOW ‘needy’ you are. I know flying is fun, but the investment one makes to get into an airline seat is CERTAINLY worth more than a damn transit worker‘s take home! Have you no pride?!
Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
"Race to the bottom" is such ALPA bull****. If $100,000k+/yr is the bottom I'm diving in.
Look before you leap. The pool is almost empty!
captain_drew is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 11:37 AM
  #15  
Baba Bluey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak
I'm curious about your profit sharing, is it related to the stock you get?? How does that work??
............And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour?..............
Nothing, how about $50 an hour?? why noy $25?? If you work enough hours $25 is a great deal Lets see, every hour over 70 at $37.50, wow you could be making real money.
The point is, pilots did make more, consideribly more before, and now they don't. Trust me, if you think what you make is good, than someone will test the water's to see at what point you still..........."dive in"

Just remember your not making $100,000 + because of your great looks, landing ability or modest ego's Your making it because an ALPA pilot was willing (and paid to) to help set the standard you guys are helping to undermine.

Where is your self-righteous indignation at the pay rates of Kalitta pilots? Or Polar? Atlas?

After all the economic and tragic circumstances that have beset this industry, you somehow come to the conclusion that one airline is the root of all of it's problems. Brilliant.

And by the way, I've seen plenty of bragging from a FEW UPS and FedEx pilots and their newfound industry-leading pay status. I wouldnt brag too much, there's a whole slew of MBA's in MEM working on the "greedy FedEx pilot" problem as well.
 
Old 01-03-2006, 11:45 AM
  #16  
Savannahguy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I do not mean to come across as a wet towel, but it might be a good time to look at the "big picture" in terms of this issue, and not just focus merely upon pay.

You see the thing about the E-170, and now E-190 pay rates being so low is that there has been a tradeoff made by the pilot groups accepting these pay scales (US Airways and jetBlue) to enable them to remain competitive.

I am not just talking about competitive just in terms of other airlines, but competitive in terms of maintaining this flying in house, and flown by your own pilots.

Some might bash jetBlue's E-190 rates, but in my opinion it is a far better thing for both jetBlue, and it's pilots that this growth remained at jetBlue (and not a jetBlue Express or jetBlue connection). Keeping the E-190's on the property means that jetBlue retains control over the product, retains all of the revenue produced, and increases shareholder value. It is obvious what opportunities E-190 growth offers to the jetBlue pilots...

Compare that with the possibility of all that E-190 flying having been farmed out instead.

IMO it is a better thing to have lower pay (and maintain that flying), rather than no pay (because someone else is flying the aircraft for you).

Last edited by Savannahguy; 01-03-2006 at 11:53 AM.
 
Old 01-03-2006, 11:49 AM
  #17  
Baba Bluey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

............
 
Old 01-04-2006, 08:20 AM
  #18  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Baba Bluey
Where is your self-righteous indignation at the pay rates of Kalitta pilots? Or Polar? Atlas?

After all the economic and tragic circumstances that have beset this industry, you somehow come to the conclusion that one airline is the root of all of it's problems. Brilliant.

.
You should be flattered I pick on you and not the Kalitta pilots. YOU and YOUR bud's are the ones (IMHO) that are (currently) driving the pay and benefits to there current levels. You should be flattered that YOU are have such a negitive effect on all pilot pay and QOL issues, your own included.
If I were you I'd point to pride how I am party to bring pilot compensation down to the level it is. Your help in lowering seat costs on the E-190 will truly be a big help in making this profession one that my kids (hopefully not) will look forward to. Brilliant
dckozak is offline  
Old 01-04-2006, 08:29 AM
  #19  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Default

Originally Posted by Savannahguy

I am not just talking about competitive just in terms of other airlines, but competitive in terms of maintaining this flying in house, and flown by your own pilots.

Some might bash jetBlue's E-190 rates, but in my opinion it is a far better thing for both jetBlue, and it's pilots that this growth remained at jetBlue (and not a jetBlue Express or jetBlue connection). Keeping the E-190's on the property means that jetBlue retains control over the product, retains all of the revenue produced, and increases shareholder value. It is obvious what opportunities E-190 growth offers to the jetBlue pilots...

Compare that with the possibility of all that E-190 flying having been farmed out instead.

IMO it is a better thing to have lower pay (and maintain that flying), rather than no pay (because someone else is flying the aircraft for you).
Your point is well taking. I think pilot groups (in the past) have hosed themselves by not keeping the flying in house. When commuters were flying receip prop planes with 10 seats or less, no self respecting airline pilot would expect (respect??) a pilot on his seniorty list flying a GA airplane. Now the prop is an jet with 100+ seats flown by the same "contract" pilots that one cares flew a Navaho. Well we have all come sow what we reap.

Still your pay on the E-190 sucks!!!
dckozak is offline  
Old 01-04-2006, 08:29 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LAfrequentflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
Default

I don't see how JB pilots are setting the low standard in pay / QOL for the rest of the industry.

Doesn't ALPA and their dues paying members set the pay / QOL at ALPA represented airlines?


Trying to learn about the industry,
LA
LAfrequentflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Golden Flyer
Hangar Talk
14
03-04-2019 10:02 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
10
08-07-2006 06:54 PM
capt_zman
Cargo
5
08-04-2006 06:25 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
07-28-2006 12:11 AM
Onfinal
Major
0
07-23-2006 07:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices