The difference? The pay...
#12
Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
Plus, Jet Blue has profit sharing. Gotta have profits to have profit sharing. Did I mention that their stock is actually worth something? That helps the old W-2 as well. And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour? A six figure income not including the aforementioned extras. Maybe I'm just not greedy enough but it sounds like a great career to me.
"Race to the bottom" is such ALPA bull****. If $100,000k+/yr is the bottom I'm diving in.
"Race to the bottom" is such ALPA bull****. If $100,000k+/yr is the bottom I'm diving in.
............And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour?..............
Nothing, how about $50 an hour?? why noy $25?? If you work enough hours $25 is a great deal Lets see, every hour over 70 at $37.50, wow you could be making real money.
The point is, pilots did make more, consideribly more before, and now they don't. Trust me, if you think what you make is good, than someone will test the water's to see at what point you still..........."dive in"
Just remember your not making $100,000 + because of your great looks, landing ability or modest ego's Your making it because an ALPA pilot was willing (and paid to) to help set the standard you guys are helping to undermine.
#13
Originally Posted by Baba Bluey
And the chest beating about how much he made at FedEx in 3...2...1...
#14
Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
Plus, Jet Blue has profit sharing. Gotta have profits to have profit sharing. Did I mention that their stock is actually worth something? That helps the old W-2 as well.
Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour? A six figure income not including the aforementioned extras. Maybe I'm just not greedy enough but it sounds like a great career to me.
Originally Posted by sarcasticspasti
"Race to the bottom" is such ALPA bull****. If $100,000k+/yr is the bottom I'm diving in.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by dckozak
I'm curious about your profit sharing, is it related to the stock you get?? How does that work??
............And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour?..............
Nothing, how about $50 an hour?? why noy $25?? If you work enough hours $25 is a great deal Lets see, every hour over 70 at $37.50, wow you could be making real money.
The point is, pilots did make more, consideribly more before, and now they don't. Trust me, if you think what you make is good, than someone will test the water's to see at what point you still..........."dive in"
Just remember your not making $100,000 + because of your great looks, landing ability or modest ego's Your making it because an ALPA pilot was willing (and paid to) to help set the standard you guys are helping to undermine.
............And what's wrong with averaging $100/hour?..............
Nothing, how about $50 an hour?? why noy $25?? If you work enough hours $25 is a great deal Lets see, every hour over 70 at $37.50, wow you could be making real money.
The point is, pilots did make more, consideribly more before, and now they don't. Trust me, if you think what you make is good, than someone will test the water's to see at what point you still..........."dive in"
Just remember your not making $100,000 + because of your great looks, landing ability or modest ego's Your making it because an ALPA pilot was willing (and paid to) to help set the standard you guys are helping to undermine.
Where is your self-righteous indignation at the pay rates of Kalitta pilots? Or Polar? Atlas?
After all the economic and tragic circumstances that have beset this industry, you somehow come to the conclusion that one airline is the root of all of it's problems. Brilliant.
And by the way, I've seen plenty of bragging from a FEW UPS and FedEx pilots and their newfound industry-leading pay status. I wouldnt brag too much, there's a whole slew of MBA's in MEM working on the "greedy FedEx pilot" problem as well.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
I do not mean to come across as a wet towel, but it might be a good time to look at the "big picture" in terms of this issue, and not just focus merely upon pay.
You see the thing about the E-170, and now E-190 pay rates being so low is that there has been a tradeoff made by the pilot groups accepting these pay scales (US Airways and jetBlue) to enable them to remain competitive.
I am not just talking about competitive just in terms of other airlines, but competitive in terms of maintaining this flying in house, and flown by your own pilots.
Some might bash jetBlue's E-190 rates, but in my opinion it is a far better thing for both jetBlue, and it's pilots that this growth remained at jetBlue (and not a jetBlue Express or jetBlue connection). Keeping the E-190's on the property means that jetBlue retains control over the product, retains all of the revenue produced, and increases shareholder value. It is obvious what opportunities E-190 growth offers to the jetBlue pilots...
Compare that with the possibility of all that E-190 flying having been farmed out instead.
IMO it is a better thing to have lower pay (and maintain that flying), rather than no pay (because someone else is flying the aircraft for you).
You see the thing about the E-170, and now E-190 pay rates being so low is that there has been a tradeoff made by the pilot groups accepting these pay scales (US Airways and jetBlue) to enable them to remain competitive.
I am not just talking about competitive just in terms of other airlines, but competitive in terms of maintaining this flying in house, and flown by your own pilots.
Some might bash jetBlue's E-190 rates, but in my opinion it is a far better thing for both jetBlue, and it's pilots that this growth remained at jetBlue (and not a jetBlue Express or jetBlue connection). Keeping the E-190's on the property means that jetBlue retains control over the product, retains all of the revenue produced, and increases shareholder value. It is obvious what opportunities E-190 growth offers to the jetBlue pilots...
Compare that with the possibility of all that E-190 flying having been farmed out instead.
IMO it is a better thing to have lower pay (and maintain that flying), rather than no pay (because someone else is flying the aircraft for you).
Last edited by Savannahguy; 01-03-2006 at 11:53 AM.
#18
Originally Posted by Baba Bluey
Where is your self-righteous indignation at the pay rates of Kalitta pilots? Or Polar? Atlas?
After all the economic and tragic circumstances that have beset this industry, you somehow come to the conclusion that one airline is the root of all of it's problems. Brilliant.
.
After all the economic and tragic circumstances that have beset this industry, you somehow come to the conclusion that one airline is the root of all of it's problems. Brilliant.
.
If I were you I'd point to pride how I am party to bring pilot compensation down to the level it is. Your help in lowering seat costs on the E-190 will truly be a big help in making this profession one that my kids (hopefully not) will look forward to. Brilliant
#19
Originally Posted by Savannahguy
I am not just talking about competitive just in terms of other airlines, but competitive in terms of maintaining this flying in house, and flown by your own pilots.
Some might bash jetBlue's E-190 rates, but in my opinion it is a far better thing for both jetBlue, and it's pilots that this growth remained at jetBlue (and not a jetBlue Express or jetBlue connection). Keeping the E-190's on the property means that jetBlue retains control over the product, retains all of the revenue produced, and increases shareholder value. It is obvious what opportunities E-190 growth offers to the jetBlue pilots...
Compare that with the possibility of all that E-190 flying having been farmed out instead.
IMO it is a better thing to have lower pay (and maintain that flying), rather than no pay (because someone else is flying the aircraft for you).
Still your pay on the E-190 sucks!!!
#20
I don't see how JB pilots are setting the low standard in pay / QOL for the rest of the industry.
Doesn't ALPA and their dues paying members set the pay / QOL at ALPA represented airlines?
Trying to learn about the industry,
LA
Doesn't ALPA and their dues paying members set the pay / QOL at ALPA represented airlines?
Trying to learn about the industry,
LA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post