Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
How are we going to compete?? >

How are we going to compete??

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

How are we going to compete??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2017, 11:25 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Originally Posted by Car Ramrod View Post
NAI will continue to add flights to the US and eventually enter into a codeshare with an airline such as Spirit or another ULCC- just like they did with Ryanair in Europe. The legacies will lose a portion of that international travel but they will adjust. The two business models will co-exist with the ULCC model being under 10% of the total seat-miles. Legacy airlines will still be the highest paid/best product. None of the legacies will go out of business. None will furlough (thanks to the retirements), but upgrades will be a bit longer. Southwest will turn out to be the best US career (like it always has been) if you are to look back to now from 20 years in the future.

That's my best guess. Time will tell.
We at spirit are planning on protecting against the possibility of that codeshare.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 02-15-2017, 12:28 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: A320 Right
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by Car Ramrod View Post
NAI will continue to add flights to the US and eventually enter into a codeshare with an airline such as Spirit or another ULCC- just like they did with Ryanair in Europe. The legacies will lose a portion of that international travel but they will adjust. The two business models will co-exist with the ULCC model being under 10% of the total seat-miles. Legacy airlines will still be the highest paid/best product. None of the legacies will go out of business. None will furlough (thanks to the retirements), but upgrades will be a bit longer. Southwest will turn out to be the best US career (like it always has been) if you are to look back to now from 20 years in the future.

That's my best guess. Time will tell.
United is one Carl Ichan away from the same fate as TWA. In fact all our airlines are. However, UA has historically been the worst managed legacy with more boom bust cycles than others.
Lots of evolving threats these days and I think it's silly to be so sure about any airlines future.
As far as the ULCC sticking to less than 10% of the market, just look at your own example of Ryann Air. It's now the largest airline in Europe.
If we are going to keep wages high in this country we can't be cavalier about the threat NIA poses. And legacy pilots should be pulling for NK and JB to get great contracts.
Gunga Din is offline  
Old 02-15-2017, 01:47 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DG1000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DCA756FO
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
None of that is a surprise to contractors world-wide.

GF
X2; As a former 737 ex-pat worker what they're offering is peanuts compared to what's out there. On the 737 side I think they'll have a hard time getting enough applicants that fit their requirements.
DG1000 is offline  
Old 02-15-2017, 02:06 PM
  #34  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,322
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
Interesting. Which leads to my next question. What is to prevent their contract from not being renewed if they join a union?

Several things...

-The sub couldn't be terminated on that basis alone. It would have to be for other causes, contract expired, didn't win bid, poor performance.
-Transition costs and disruption
-Loss of corporate knowledge
-The fact that the next subcontractor could and probably would unionize as well
- Flight attendants don't make that much anyway and none of them make much more than when they started. They certainly don't go from $20K to $300K. They're simply not goping to save that much by going through the Chinese fire drill of replacing them, especially since they'd have to do it every five years or so.

While pilots in that situation would be inclined to stick it out to the end (see COMAIR), many or most FA's would go find other jobs asap, probably leading to cancellations. Assuming these are American workers, vice third country nationals chained to the oar by H1B visas.

Hopefully nobody in DC is going to be giving these idiots H1B's.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-15-2017, 02:19 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Southwest will turn out to be the best US career (like it always has been) if you are to look back to now from 20 years in the future.
WN wasn't always "the best US carrier"; at one time it was looked at as NK or JB is today. EA's MEC was challenged to meet WN labor costs.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 02-15-2017, 04:14 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Car Ramrod View Post
NAI will continue to add flights to the US and eventually enter into a codeshare with an airline such as Spirit or another ULCC- just like they did with Ryanair in Europe. The legacies will lose a portion of that international travel but they will adjust. The two business models will co-exist with the ULCC model being under 10% of the total seat-miles. Legacy airlines will still be the highest paid/best product. None of the legacies will go out of business. None will furlough (thanks to the retirements), but upgrades will be a bit longer.
Probably the most intelligent post on the subject ever.
NMuir is offline  
Old 02-15-2017, 10:20 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

My prediction: They are promising to hire 50% US national pilots. With those pay rates, they won't get enough pilots. So, they "tried." Now they will have to hire foreign nationals to fill the schedule. Oh well.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 02-16-2017, 04:36 AM
  #38  
Banned
 
Car Ramrod's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus FO
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
WN wasn't always "the best US carrier"; at one time it was looked at as NK or JB is today. EA's MEC was challenged to meet WN labor costs.

GF
I knew someone would challenge that comment. If you turned 65 tomorrow and you could go back 30 years and choose where you work. Where would that be? Where would you want to work in 1987? I would chose southwest.
Car Ramrod is offline  
Old 02-16-2017, 06:17 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Car Ramrod,

Yes, true, looking back, but you can't do that. In 1987, WN was down many pilots' list of airlines. AA, DL were first choices, followed by UA after the strike, then some of the now-merged legacies--WA (merged with DL in '87), AK, and perhaps WN. CO was a train wreck. FDX was a night operation, UPS an unknown. No RJs, so that was a future problem.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 02-16-2017, 10:35 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
My prediction: They are promising to hire 50% US national pilots. With those pay rates, they won't get enough pilots. So, they "tried." Now they will have to hire foreign nationals to fill the schedule. Oh well.
Really? Because last time I checked there weren't enough foreign nationals to go around either.
NMuir is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sulkair
Major
86
01-07-2016 07:53 AM
Skyone
Major
75
12-04-2013 05:49 PM
fdxbusdriver
Cargo
17
12-10-2008 03:45 PM
AZFlyer
Hangar Talk
1
02-28-2008 06:45 AM
Sir James
Major
10
03-29-2007 06:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices