Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
CPB sets up check point on jetway of SFO-JFK >

CPB sets up check point on jetway of SFO-JFK

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

CPB sets up check point on jetway of SFO-JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2017 | 10:11 AM
  #111  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AC560
That is sort of how a representative democracy works. You should try Switzerland if you are more interested in a direct democracy form of government.

Our government is not a representative democracy. It is, in practice a plutocracy.

Here, please educate yourself.
https://youtu.be/5tu32CCA_Ig
Old 02-28-2017 | 02:22 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tybus
I can agree with that. In fact no one is innocent. The only only reason you're not in prison is because the powers to be haven't come after you for the crimes you have most certainly committed. The laws in this country are so numerous that everyone is guilty of a crime and most don't realize it.

You Commit Three Felonies a Day
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014...38900830760842
This was written in 1957:
"Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed? We want them broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against . . . We're after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you'd better get wise to it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."

Ayn Rand
Old 02-28-2017 | 06:30 PM
  #113  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry
I hate to split hairs-but there is not a "right to privacy." Never has been one.

It is a right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The whole "right to privacy" is a modern invention-and an attempt to make the constitution to appear to contain something it doesn't.
Actually if you read the 9th and 10th Amendment, combined with the Declaration of Independence you'll find that individuals reserve all rights (which are natural and predate the American government)
Old 02-28-2017 | 06:31 PM
  #114  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AC560
The Constitution provides only one entity to interpret the Constitution and that is the SCOTUS. While you may feel your opinion is valid, unless you happen to be one of the 9 justices it isn't.
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
You can't sat that, only the Supreme Court can for federal law.

GF
Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
The SCOTUS gets to interpret the Constitution


That actually isn't true. The Court took it upon themselves to have that power in Marbury v Madison.

And also, state governments are allowed to nullify federal laws they deem unconstitutional.
Old 02-28-2017 | 06:32 PM
  #115  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Baron50
Try that at a DUI checkpoint.

You lost your fourth amendment right to privacy and unreasonable search when the SCOTUS (split decision) allowed an exception for public safety.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_checkpoint
The difference being is the courts just made up something called "implied consent" meaning that if you get a license to drive you thereby consent to being searched at random whenever operating a vehicle.
Old 02-28-2017 | 06:33 PM
  #116  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
Oops, the OP got himself a ban. Wonder what happened to him?
No, the rumors of my absence have been greatly exaggerated
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pilatusguy
Aviation Law
25
02-22-2022 01:21 AM
lowflying
Major
0
07-21-2013 01:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices