Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Butthurt (formerly Baffled) >

Butthurt (formerly Baffled)

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Butthurt (formerly Baffled)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2019 | 05:07 AM
  #151  
detpilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Trying not to crash
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
I don't know when that's gunna get old. I'm damn near 50 and it's still funny.
Yeees!!! Haha!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-01-2019 | 03:39 PM
  #152  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,604
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Factual evidence? LOL yeah some fishing there for sure.

My best tool to bring the best of the best pilots down to earth (military or civilian) for a bit is my antique bare bones no electrical system 65hp fabric and wood tailwheel airplane.

I wanted to fly military. Like from age 5 bad. Lucky for you top guns out there, they stopped issuing waivers for color vision during the early 90’s drawdown. I basically got the TBNT.

In my 20 years of being paid to fly, I have learned that the military airline guys can be further categorized by branch and aircraft.

With humor in mind, I’ve learned:

F-15 guys are typically pretty wound up. Very much into “the book says exactly this.” Chardonnay drinkers, and only one. Lots of rules and books. And micro managing the energy. Like a lot.

F-16 guys are less wound up knowing that they can pull on the stick and engage without worrying about over G. They like to use this against F-15’s. They love Germany. They like to live in Colorado Springs and drink Coors Light.

A-10 guys speak with one volume, loud. They drink straight whiskey. They have mixed emotions that the currrent fight is a high one, not a low one. Whatever that means. They like football and avoiding icing conditions of any kind.

Navy Hornet guys are fairly relaxed. They love Top Gun. And the boat. Those that flew Tomcats wish they still flew them. They don’t want to discuss the volleyball scene. Lots of high fives.

Marine Aviators hate the boat and don’t give a **** about rules or any other branch of service for that matter. Tequila shooters and stories about Okinawa and fighting sailors. They are part of the infantry.

Cobra guys like Air Force installations because of ice cream and air conditioning. They know nothing about not being deployed. They are also infantry.

AH64 guys are usually serious and quiet. They have generally killed any sort of military vehicle used in battle.

C-17, C-130, KC, and C-5 crews like breaking down in a Caribbean destination. Or Australia.

AC-130 guys are angry at the leadership.

Anyhow, thank you vets for your service. Glad to fly with you.


This is hilarious! Well done.
Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 05:39 AM
  #153  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
lmao.

Most of the guys who can't cut it are .mil guys with no 121 experience. RJ drivers have been doing the exact same check ride, in transport jets in and out of the the exact same airports with the exact same passengers in the same paint job as mainline for decades.

I have yet to encounter a .mil pilot that impresses me with their awesome Uncle Sam flying skills.
Thank you. This includes regionals and the direct hires into majors. I had experience with two former military applicants who had no idea what a flow was. According to them everything they did was READ-DO. The simple flow concept like blew their mind causing some embarrassing struggle. When I finished college 5-years ago the big talk was about airlines not preferring military candidates due to the lack of CRM training. However, like someone else said it ain’t the flying experience that gets them into the door, it’s the padded resumes. There’s a lot of lazy OTS guys who like to play the ‘see how fast I can reach the minimums’ game (side note: kind of unsettling knowing there’s regional captains up there with only 2 years total industry exp all as an FO) then apply to a legacy only to get hired 10 years later because their resume doesn’t separate them from the rest of crowd. Then complain about it... airlines hire ‘professionals’ not ‘pilots’ and your background should reflect that.
Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 06:10 AM
  #154  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
It doesn't have anything to do with worship. When I interview an ex-military pilot I KNOW the standardization of training and qualifications that he/she has been required to meet over the course of his/her career.

I KNOW for a fact that they didn't "earn" their licenses at some cheesy Mom and Pop FBO that will pass you as long as you can pay. They didn't get their type ratings at some sim center that will sign you off when your check clears.

They didn't get their PIC experience at some backwater "regional" airline that flies between Denver and Gillette three times a day.

That's why ex-military guys get preference. But, I wouldn't expect non-military types to even begin to comprehend that simple fact.
I KNOW for a fact that my DPE’s/FAA Examiners held me to the standards set in the PTS that lead to me earning my ratings, despite my training coming from the local FBO.

I KNOW for a fact that military pilots are held to similar standards by their examiners after their training.

In the end, regardless of training you still have to pass the same ‘checkride’.

And yes, the 121 PIC experience at some “backwater” regional flying between two cities is FAR less valuable than the guy who does 1 sortie a month in blocked airspace or the guy wasting my taxpayer money dropping bombs on innocent people in the eyes of the hiring manager at a legacy... it’s all clear to me now where I took the wrong turn in my career...

It’s funny because the airline I fly for basically has a ‘separate’ training department with additional allocated funds/resources for mil guys with no 121, so there can’t be that much cost savings...
Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 07:21 AM
  #155  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
From: systems analyst
Default

Originally Posted by stabapch

And yes, the 121 PIC experience at some “backwater” regional flying between two cities is FAR less valuable than the guy who does 1 sortie a month in blocked airspace or the guy wasting my taxpayer money dropping bombs on innocent people in the eyes of the hiring manager at a legacy... it’s all clear to me now where I took the wrong turn in my career...
You were actually doing pretty well with your point of view until you dropped this little rat turd of a totally inaccurate statement that is so far off the mark of reality, it made me ram dump your entire perspective. You sir, just slam dunked yourself into the butthurt category.

Passing one checkride in no way validates the true depth of ones training. Only a noob with no depth nor experience would believe that
Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 07:47 AM
  #156  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by stabapch
I KNOW for a fact that my DPE’s/FAA Examiners held me to the standards set in the PTS that lead to me earning my ratings, despite my training coming from the local FBO.

I KNOW for a fact that military pilots are held to similar standards by their examiners after their training.

In the end, regardless of training you still have to pass the same ‘checkride’.

And yes, the 121 PIC experience at some “backwater” regional flying between two cities is FAR less valuable than the guy who does 1 sortie a month in blocked airspace or the guy wasting my taxpayer money dropping bombs on innocent people in the eyes of the hiring manager at a legacy... it’s all clear to me now where I took the wrong turn in my career...

It’s funny because the airline I fly for basically has a ‘separate’ training department with additional allocated funds/resources for mil guys with no 121, so there can’t be that much cost savings...
This is the most naive and clueless post I've read in a while. Go on thinking that if it makes you feel better.
Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 07:50 AM
  #157  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 08:06 AM
  #158  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by deadseal
You were actually doing pretty well with your point of view until you dropped this little rat turd of a totally inaccurate statement that is so far off the mark of reality, it made me ram dump your entire perspective. You sir, just slam dunked yourself into the butthurt category.

Passing one checkride in no way validates the true depth of ones training. Only a noob with no depth nor experience would believe that
No butthurt here son. I’m right where I want to be thanks to my own effort.

Only a person with zero common sense would argue that military training is more favorable than civilian training in a civilian industry. Military pilots are trained to handle “weapon deployment systems” to complete a mission; civilian pilots are trained to handle “passenger/cargo air transport category aircraft” from point A to point B. A monkey can fly an aircraft, but the mindset of the pilots are molded differently through training for the goal that needs to be accomplished.

Military pilots are not better candidates than civilian for a 121 Air Carrier operation and vice versa for a military operation. Plain and simple.
Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 08:20 AM
  #159  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 949
Likes: 58
Default

Originally Posted by stabapch
Only a person with zero common sense would argue that military training is more favorable than civilian training in a civilian industry.
Man, you’re seriously showing your butt on this one. While I can’t speak to one’s common sense, or lack thereof, I can tell you this statement is patently false. Have a lot of experience with mil-civ hiring do you? If this comes from a position of experience, I’ll gladly defer to you, but something tells me you haven’t been around mil or civ hiring environments very long - if at all - with this statement.

Looking forward to your next bit of wisdom...
Reply
Old 02-02-2019 | 08:30 AM
  #160  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This is the most naive and clueless post I've read in a while. Go on thinking that if it makes you feel better.
What’s so naive about it? It’s pretty naive and illogical to argue that military pilots are better suited for a CIVILIAN industry than a civilian trained pilot.

I don’t have to think that to make me feel better, I witness it in training and on the line. It doesn’t make me ‘feel better,’ but the arrogance you get from the average military guy amounts to a good laugh every now and then.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices