Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Butthurt (formerly Baffled) >

Butthurt (formerly Baffled)

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Butthurt (formerly Baffled)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2019, 11:12 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e
Where in the post did it say anything about the mil guy's "qualifications" relative to "par"?

All he said was that the guy...


Is size of largest aircraft flown relative to a King Air a major component of "qualifications" for getting an interview at FedEx?
I don't know, that's a matter between FedEx and... FedEx. But the post clearly compared the size of the military pilot's airplane experience as negative against the poster's own 5 type ratings, 2 check pilot quals, and 121 command time. That comparison was so clear that he characterized the resulting decision as "BS." I'm straining at how it can possibly be intended, or read, in a different way.

Last edited by vessbot; 01-27-2019 at 11:22 AM.
vessbot is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 11:37 AM
  #112  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,923
Default

Originally Posted by vessbot
I don't know, that's a matter between FedEx and... FedEx. But the post clearly compared the size of the military pilot's airplane experience as negative against the poster's own 5 type ratings, 2 check pilot quals, and 121 command time. That comparison was so clear that he characterized the resulting decision as "BS." I'm straining at how it can possibly be intended, or read, in a different way.
You're the one who used the phrase "subpar qualifications", not the OP.

Sub par for whom? "Negative" for whom?

Obviously not sub par for the pilot hiring folks at FedEx, but apparently in the minds of a bunch of posters in this thread (including the OP) who are not professionally evaluating the qualifications of pilots being interviewed at Purple.

The reasons for the situation the OP encountered have been covered well in several other posts in this thread, and given that info, the "nothing larger than a King Air" benchmark isn't an indicator of "subpar qualifications."
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 11:40 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Prettywhacked1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: A320
Posts: 241
Default

Read back through this thread........lots of opinions, so I’ll offer my .02........

I’ve had many guys & a few gals next to me in the cockpit lead (or answer during intros at cruise) with the “I was gonna go fly in the (fill in the branch of service here), BUT (insert excuse here).......”

Never had a veteran lead (or same reply) with ,“I wish I could’ve gotten here (seat) without serving my country, but came up blank.....”

Any questions?
Prettywhacked1 is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 12:04 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e
You're the one who used the phrase "subpar qualifications", not the OP.
Yes it was a 2 word summary of a longer post, so I can make a quick reference to it. He didn't actually say that phrase, (and if it is a false characterization of his post, he has my apologies) yet I think it's an accurate summary (as do you apparently, since you literally wrote that it is "in the minds of a bunch of posters" here, yet nobody used it.)

Sub par for whom? "Negative" for whom?
The original poster, of course. This should be obvious since I've been talking about him since the beginning. Who else?

The reasons for the situation the OP encountered have been covered well in several other posts in this thread, and given that info, the "nothing larger than a King Air" benchmark isn't an indicator of "subpar qualifications."
I agree. A huge deal is often made about 121 experience, and it matters some, but I don't think it is the end all be all. Yes one should go through at least a few IROPS (both summer and winter) before doing it in the left seat, but all the 121 stuff can be learned on the job (and is, every day), especially by someone with leadership and management experience in a dynamic environment. What's far more difficult to learn on the job is how to fly. The training curriculum already assumes you can do it, and you need that in your background. I think someone in this thread said that in 121 you need a very specific specific set of skills, and that's partly true. What you need going into the job, is the generalist set of skills of an aviator and pilot (yes pilot, not just "automation manager"). That, from how I've seen things described, is something the military does. Civilian background, it's hit or miss depending on each person's history. The specialist skills of 121 are gained on the job and developed in the right seat.
vessbot is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 12:14 PM
  #115  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,697
Default

Factual evidence? LOL yeah some fishing there for sure.

My best tool to bring the best of the best pilots down to earth (military or civilian) for a bit is my antique bare bones no electrical system 65hp fabric and wood tailwheel airplane.

I wanted to fly military. Like from age 5 bad. Lucky for you top guns out there, they stopped issuing waivers for color vision during the early 90’s drawdown. I basically got the TBNT.

In my 20 years of being paid to fly, I have learned that the military airline guys can be further categorized by branch and aircraft.

With humor in mind, I’ve learned:

F-15 guys are typically pretty wound up. Very much into “the book says exactly this.” Chardonnay drinkers, and only one. Lots of rules and books. And micro managing the energy. Like a lot.

F-16 guys are less wound up knowing that they can pull on the stick and engage without worrying about over G. They like to use this against F-15’s. They love Germany. They like to live in Colorado Springs and drink Coors Light.

A-10 guys speak with one volume, loud. They drink straight whiskey. They have mixed emotions that the currrent fight is a high one, not a low one. Whatever that means. They like football and avoiding icing conditions of any kind.

Navy Hornet guys are fairly relaxed. They love Top Gun. And the boat. Those that flew Tomcats wish they still flew them. They don’t want to discuss the volleyball scene. Lots of high fives.

Marine Aviators hate the boat and don’t give a **** about rules or any other branch of service for that matter. Tequila shooters and stories about Okinawa and fighting sailors. They are part of the infantry.

Cobra guys like Air Force installations because of ice cream and air conditioning. They know nothing about not being deployed. They are also infantry.

AH64 guys are usually serious and quiet. They have generally killed any sort of military vehicle used in battle.

C-17, C-130, KC, and C-5 crews like breaking down in a Caribbean destination. Or Australia.

AC-130 guys are angry at the leadership.

Anyhow, thank you vets for your service. Glad to fly with you.

Last edited by tomgoodman; 01-27-2019 at 01:18 PM. Reason: Quoted political post
at6d is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 12:22 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 508
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Factual evidence? LOL yeah some fishing there for sure.



My best tool to bring the best of the best pilots down to earth (military or civilian) for a bit is my antique bare bones no electrical system 65hp fabric and wood tailwheel airplane.



I wanted to fly military. Like from age 5 bad. Lucky for you top guns out there, they stopped issuing waivers for color vision during the early 90’s drawdown. I basically got the TBNT.



In my 20 years of being paid to fly, I have learned that the military airline guys can be further categorized by branch and aircraft.



With humor in mind, I’ve learned:



F-15 guys are typically pretty wound up. Very much into “the book says exactly this.” Chardonnay drinkers, and only one. Lots of rules and books. And micro managing the energy. Like a lot.



F-16 guys are less wound up knowing that they can pull on the stick and engage without worrying about over G. They like to use this against F-15’s. They love Germany. They like to live in Colorado Springs and drink Coors Light.



A-10 guys speak with one volume, loud. They drink straight whiskey. They have mixed emotions that the currrent fight is a high one, not a low one. Whatever that means. They like football and avoiding icing conditions of any kind.



Navy Hornet guys are fairly relaxed. They love Top Gun. And the boat. Those that flew Tomcats wish they still flew them. They don’t want to discuss the volleyball scene. Lots of high fives.



Marine Aviators hate the boat and don’t give a **** about rules or any other branch of service for that matter. Tequila shooters and stories about Okinawa and fighting sailors. They are part of the infantry.



Cobra guys like Air Force installations because of ice cream and air conditioning. They know nothing about not being deployed. They are also infantry.



AH64 guys are usually serious and quiet. They have generally killed any sort of military vehicle used in battle.



C-17, C-130, KC, and C-5 crews like breaking down in a Caribbean destination. Or Australia.



AC-130 guys are angry at the leadership.



Anyhow, thank you vets for your service. Glad to fly with you.


Haha. Truth! However, I will say that you can't categorize everyone that precisely. I've flown with some pretty mellow F-15 guys on occasion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Burton78 is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 12:43 PM
  #117  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: systems analyst
Posts: 757
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Factual evidence? LOL yeah some fishing there for sure.

.
Sooo, funny synopsis. How exactly do you disagree with my only point that mil training is better than civilian?

What possible evidence? I can spout in depth academics, stand ups, ep training massive amounts of simulator time.....please enlighten me.
Also....you got the drinks all wrong
F16 pilots drink Jeremiah weed bruh
deadseal is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 12:43 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TeamSasquatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 509
Default

Finally something that makes sense....


Originally Posted by at6d
Factual evidence? LOL yeah some fishing there for sure.

My best tool to bring the best of the best pilots down to earth (military or civilian) for a bit is my antique bare bones no electrical system 65hp fabric and wood tailwheel airplane.

I wanted to fly military. Like from age 5 bad. Lucky for you top guns out there, they stopped issuing waivers for color vision during the early 90’s drawdown. I basically got the TBNT.

In my 20 years of being paid to fly, I have learned that the military airline guys can be further categorized by branch and aircraft.

With humor in mind, I’ve learned:

F-15 guys are typically pretty wound up. Very much into “the book says exactly this.” Chardonnay drinkers, and only one. Lots of rules and books. And micro managing the energy. Like a lot.

F-16 guys are less wound up knowing that they can pull on the stick and engage without worrying about over G. They like to use this against F-15’s. They love Germany. They like to live in Colorado Springs and drink Coors Light.

A-10 guys speak with one volume, loud. They drink straight whiskey. They have mixed emotions that the currrent fight is a high one, not a low one. Whatever that means. They like football and avoiding icing conditions of any kind.

Navy Hornet guys are fairly relaxed. They love Top Gun. And the boat. Those that flew Tomcats wish they still flew them. They don’t want to discuss the volleyball scene. Lots of high fives.

Marine Aviators hate the boat and don’t give a **** about rules or any other branch of service for that matter. Tequila shooters and stories about Okinawa and fighting sailors. They are part of the infantry.

Cobra guys like Air Force installations because of ice cream and air conditioning. They know nothing about not being deployed. They are also infantry.

AH64 guys are usually serious and quiet. They have generally killed any sort of military vehicle used in battle.

C-17, C-130, KC, and C-5 crews like breaking down in a Caribbean destination. Or Australia.

AC-130 guys are angry at the leadership.

Anyhow, thank you vets for your service. Glad to fly with you.
TeamSasquatch is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 02:09 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: Pilot
Posts: 522
Default

If the airlines desire to hire the safest and most efficient pilots I believe there is great opportunity to reform the hiring systems that exist.

Sometimes it would seem the airlines would do better throwing darts blindfolded.
AntiPeter is offline  
Old 01-27-2019, 03:55 PM
  #120  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,697
Default

Originally Posted by deadseal
Sooo, funny synopsis. How exactly do you disagree with my only point that mil training is better than civilian?

What possible evidence? I can spout in depth academics, stand ups, ep training massive amounts of simulator time.....please enlighten me.
Also....you got the drinks all wrong
F16 pilots drink Jeremiah weed bruh
Nope something went south here.

I was replying to a comment in a previous post which I believe may have been deleted or I just jacked it up from another topic.

The post referenced the “factual evidence of Trump/Russia collusion.” Hence my fishing analogy.

In my opinion, the civilian world of commercial aviation and the military world of combat have very little crossover and most is apples vs. oranges. It’s just a different world.

I would love to see what happens when a 10,000 hour plus airline guy goes to fighter school. I’m guessing lots of un-learning?

I used to teach multiengine students in older Beech aircraft. This served me well when I went to the ATR and SF3. I couldn’t imagine the learning curve for a single-engine/single-seat tactical guy that gets the firehouse directly into a Q-400 or 737.
at6d is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices