Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Butthurt (formerly Baffled) >

Butthurt (formerly Baffled)

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Butthurt (formerly Baffled)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2019 | 09:25 AM
  #101  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 16
From: Midfield downwind
Default

Originally Posted by Floobs
Not in the industry.

For the Most part the job is the same. Very little extra “leadership” is required.
Troll game getting kind of weak here, dude.

"The industry" is apparently so complex that the airmanship that military guys get during their careers is apparently not sufficient to skip years of experience-building at a regional....but the 121 gig is also simultaneously so simple that a move to the left seat barely requires more knowledge or experience than the right seat.

Riiiiiight.
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 09:35 AM
  #102  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by CoefficientX
After 19 years in the right seat of my major airline I can say I see no difference in airmanship between civilian and military. I’ve flown with excellent captains, military and civilian and I’ve also flown with not so excellent captains, military and civilians.
Like I said, there's such a thing as "good enough" pilots.

Mil people bring more to the table than basic pilot skills, and it's a known predictable quantity. This is how HR looks at it.

Also to "graduate" from the military requires a lot of work ethic. But there's nothing that forces such graduates to keep up the pace once they get to the airlines. Some of them certainly slack off.

Originally Posted by CoefficientX
Let’s not make the assumption that all pilots tried to get in the military and only the best made it. There are plenty of outstanding pilots that had no desire whatsoever to join the military.
Not so much. I grew up in civil aviation, I've flown with all of them. Most wanted to fly in the mil. The ones who didn't were typically on the wealthier side.

Originally Posted by CoefficientX
Lots of chest thumping going on here. After 19 years of observation from the right seat I can say to all the ex military guys who think just because you are ex military you’re better than the civilian guys........you aren’t.

Without getting into the details, I did the full civilian track up to RJ's. Seen both worlds.

The "average" military guy jumped through a lot more hurdles and filters than the "average" civilian. Some of that is because they were forced to, I certainly benefited from military structure when I was young. It's a combination of screening/filtering, and the experience gained.

But again, it's as much about "good employee" as "good pilot". According to HR, which is the left seat on hiring.

You could make the same argument about industry, nuclear power plants, etc. They all like to hire ex-military officers too. Many big companies have custom fast-track management programs for ex-mil. Why should THEY hire mil?

Bottom line, this is pee-ing into the wind.
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 09:43 AM
  #103  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
My NAS training experience was seven months long. It consisted of an EASA medical and Norwegian air force swim test, One month at Boeing Miami, one month in Norway doing corporate training including CRM with an ex Norwegian air force pilot psychologist. We did the cabin crew cooperation CRM course and security equipment training with British Airways. My three line trainers were a Dutch ex-navy instructor with over 20 years of TRI/TRE experience at KLM, an ex Luftwaffe Tornado instructor, and an Emirates TRI/TRE. Many in my class were ex military and we had a couple of Red Bull racers at the company as well.


You may not like the political aspect of Norwegian but to say the training experience is somehow subpar to U.S. domestic or even a regional carriers is completely disconnected from reality.
Was this at NAI?
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 09:54 AM
  #104  
captjns's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
10M Airline Miles
20 Years
150 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,217
Likes: 52
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Default

Originally Posted by TeamSasquatch
You got it! Still have 15 pages to go before the ETC (expect thread closed) of 25 pages.
Want some in the mean time?
Attached Images
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 10:01 AM
  #105  
Swimmin' in da pool
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

The best majors essentially feel they have plenty of qualified (ie safe) pilot applications, so they are trying to cherry-pick those who fit their version of the "good employee" template.

Military officers often went to "name brand" schools, often on scholarships, often athletes, usually have a masters, always have leadership, management, and organizational skills. If they've completed ten years, they demonstrated a continuously upward progression in skill, responsibility, and leadership. That's all good "organizational fit" stuff. I have know civilian-only RJ drivers who had similar resumes, they generally get scooped up by majors pretty quickly too.
^^^this^^^

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI9Hfqbuz

So amusing. Couldn't resist.

After years spent on a hiring committee, I can assure you HR doesn't care "who the best pilot is"; the application process itself ensures the minimum experience, training, licensing and skill sets are met. As with any labor group, HR looks for the best fit with the fewest potential problems. No headaches, no liabilities, plain and simple. FWIW, I've spent a career flying with both Mil and Civ, trained both, and seen equally great--and horrible, with both. The mil guys justifiably take a bit more time to spool up to -121, but generally at a rate few accountants would quibble over, given the end product is delivered.

HR teams use proven, straightforward methods in their screening process to find their 'lowest risk' candidate': flush out potential training liabilities ("...Any training failures, accidents, incidents"?) followed by what kind of employee you will be?: happy 'company pilot' who spreads the cheer to customers and fellow employees, rarely calls out sick, average joe, or 'disgruntled, sick call abuser, union thug, blah, blah. Ain't rocket surgery...

Notice the -121 folks getting called first are generally the ones who've filled the leadership/management boxes on their application: College? What level? GPA? Instructor, Check airman, Chief Pilot, Ass. Chief pilot, etc.

Why? Documented evidence aligning priorities listed above (liability, good fit, etc)

A) Proven abilities to handle challenges associated with trainees
B) Selected among peers to represent the company
C) Inclined to align with 'company values'
D) Generally positive attitude

All other things being equal, makes sense.

As for the Mil guys, same logic: most were officers, which by definition are management material (at least on paper). Fully documented management, leadership and flight training, disciplined, from reputable schools, successfully competed for limited OTS, ROTC, or Service Academy slots. In management's eyes, cutting one's teeth in such highly structured environments causes one to be more conformist, conservative, and management-minded than civilian counterparts. In other words, 'company-men', less likely to follow the dreaded union mindset. That may change later (often does), but to HR, that's the product. Throw in a secondary income and medical and the picture should become clearer.

Bottom line: "It's not your flying, Maverick..."

To the OP: be patient; barring a catastrophe, you'll get your call eventually. The stunning numbers of retirements will ensure those who meet the mins and can fog a mirror will get the call.

Last edited by dawgdriver; 01-27-2019 at 10:21 AM.
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 10:02 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by vagabond
I changed the title of this thread.



Hope y'all like the new name!


Accurate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 10:17 AM
  #107  
CAirBear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by vagabond
I changed the title of this thread.

Hope y'all like the new name!
Cool. And you could also start by closing it as well.

Sincerely,

Everyone
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 10:25 AM
  #108  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Default

On the maintenance side, military kids make the best worker bees. They will go farther, faster, and ask for less than most civilians that tend to look out for themselves. Airlines are structured so that kids with military backgrounds are right at home. They usually do poorly in GA where a mechanic has to be crafty.
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 10:38 AM
  #109  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 198
From: Looking left
Default

https://www.reddit.com/r/reactiongif...other_tide_ad/
Reply
Old 01-27-2019 | 11:10 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,369
Likes: 367
Default

Looking at the Fedex Milennial oddity thread, it doesn’t seem to be military guys having problems...
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices