Butthurt (formerly Baffled)
#101
China Visa Applicant
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 16
From: Midfield downwind
"The industry" is apparently so complex that the airmanship that military guys get during their careers is apparently not sufficient to skip years of experience-building at a regional....but the 121 gig is also simultaneously so simple that a move to the left seat barely requires more knowledge or experience than the right seat.
Riiiiiight.
#102
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 698
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Mil people bring more to the table than basic pilot skills, and it's a known predictable quantity. This is how HR looks at it.
Also to "graduate" from the military requires a lot of work ethic. But there's nothing that forces such graduates to keep up the pace once they get to the airlines. Some of them certainly slack off.
Without getting into the details, I did the full civilian track up to RJ's. Seen both worlds.
The "average" military guy jumped through a lot more hurdles and filters than the "average" civilian. Some of that is because they were forced to, I certainly benefited from military structure when I was young. It's a combination of screening/filtering, and the experience gained.
But again, it's as much about "good employee" as "good pilot". According to HR, which is the left seat on hiring.
You could make the same argument about industry, nuclear power plants, etc. They all like to hire ex-military officers too. Many big companies have custom fast-track management programs for ex-mil. Why should THEY hire mil?
Bottom line, this is pee-ing into the wind.
#103
My NAS training experience was seven months long. It consisted of an EASA medical and Norwegian air force swim test, One month at Boeing Miami, one month in Norway doing corporate training including CRM with an ex Norwegian air force pilot psychologist. We did the cabin crew cooperation CRM course and security equipment training with British Airways. My three line trainers were a Dutch ex-navy instructor with over 20 years of TRI/TRE experience at KLM, an ex Luftwaffe Tornado instructor, and an Emirates TRI/TRE. Many in my class were ex military and we had a couple of Red Bull racers at the company as well.
You may not like the political aspect of Norwegian but to say the training experience is somehow subpar to U.S. domestic or even a regional carriers is completely disconnected from reality.
You may not like the political aspect of Norwegian but to say the training experience is somehow subpar to U.S. domestic or even a regional carriers is completely disconnected from reality.
#104
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,217
Likes: 52
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
#105
Swimmin' in da pool
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
The best majors essentially feel they have plenty of qualified (ie safe) pilot applications, so they are trying to cherry-pick those who fit their version of the "good employee" template.
Military officers often went to "name brand" schools, often on scholarships, often athletes, usually have a masters, always have leadership, management, and organizational skills. If they've completed ten years, they demonstrated a continuously upward progression in skill, responsibility, and leadership. That's all good "organizational fit" stuff. I have know civilian-only RJ drivers who had similar resumes, they generally get scooped up by majors pretty quickly too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI9Hfqbuz
So amusing. Couldn't resist.
After years spent on a hiring committee, I can assure you HR doesn't care "who the best pilot is"; the application process itself ensures the minimum experience, training, licensing and skill sets are met. As with any labor group, HR looks for the best fit with the fewest potential problems. No headaches, no liabilities, plain and simple. FWIW, I've spent a career flying with both Mil and Civ, trained both, and seen equally great--and horrible, with both. The mil guys justifiably take a bit more time to spool up to -121, but generally at a rate few accountants would quibble over, given the end product is delivered.
HR teams use proven, straightforward methods in their screening process to find their 'lowest risk' candidate': flush out potential training liabilities ("...Any training failures, accidents, incidents"?) followed by what kind of employee you will be?: happy 'company pilot' who spreads the cheer to customers and fellow employees, rarely calls out sick, average joe, or 'disgruntled, sick call abuser, union thug, blah, blah. Ain't rocket surgery...
Notice the -121 folks getting called first are generally the ones who've filled the leadership/management boxes on their application: College? What level? GPA? Instructor, Check airman, Chief Pilot, Ass. Chief pilot, etc.
Why? Documented evidence aligning priorities listed above (liability, good fit, etc)
A) Proven abilities to handle challenges associated with trainees
B) Selected among peers to represent the company
C) Inclined to align with 'company values'
D) Generally positive attitude
All other things being equal, makes sense.
As for the Mil guys, same logic: most were officers, which by definition are management material (at least on paper). Fully documented management, leadership and flight training, disciplined, from reputable schools, successfully competed for limited OTS, ROTC, or Service Academy slots. In management's eyes, cutting one's teeth in such highly structured environments causes one to be more conformist, conservative, and management-minded than civilian counterparts. In other words, 'company-men', less likely to follow the dreaded union mindset. That may change later (often does), but to HR, that's the product. Throw in a secondary income and medical and the picture should become clearer.
Bottom line: "It's not your flying, Maverick..."
To the OP: be patient; barring a catastrophe, you'll get your call eventually. The stunning numbers of retirements will ensure those who meet the mins and can fog a mirror will get the call.
Last edited by dawgdriver; 01-27-2019 at 10:21 AM.
#108
Banned
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
On the maintenance side, military kids make the best worker bees. They will go farther, faster, and ask for less than most civilians that tend to look out for themselves. Airlines are structured so that kids with military backgrounds are right at home. They usually do poorly in GA where a mechanic has to be crafty.
#109




