Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement age 67

Old 05-21-2022 | 12:10 PM
  #261  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
I remember looking up most junior captain at American in 2016. It was a ‘96 hire on the super 80 in LGA. Pretty sure someone hired at age 31 and not upgrading on an MD-80 while commuting to LaGuardia at 50 would notice.

Saying that won’t happen again sounds like Doug Parker saying the airlines won’t lose money again.

There are waves in aviation. Nothing is assured and today’s predictions are meaningless. Not to mention that some of these waves are already on the back end.
But the economic waves are independent of any hypothetical change in retirement age. Changing the age does not cause recessions, wars, etc. Those will happen or not, regardless.

Could you find a rare example who could have just barely upgraded, and somehow never been downgraded over 20 years of turmoil? Sure. But changing or not changing the age will not have that sort of effect on most people. Silver lining, the guy who got stuck as an FO got to enjoy good seniority and stayed married, compared to the guy who upgraded to junior reserve and stayed there for a couple decades.

I'm not even advocating for the change and if it looks imminent I might even grab an upgrade on the next bid for those reasons. But it's only going to have 2 year ish impact on most people.
Old 05-21-2022 | 12:13 PM
  #262  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by dualinput

Older gens think sure a younger person can recover or wait out a pause but life doesn’t go on pause while your career does. Decisions get made and pilots leave from the bottom and cut their losses
Age 67/68 is not going to cause pilots to leave the industry in any sort of numbers. It will result in a small but net reduction in pilot demand for a couple years. Not long enough to solve the pilot shortage by any means.
Old 05-21-2022 | 12:51 PM
  #263  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Age 67/68 is not going to cause pilots to leave the industry in any sort of numbers. It will result in a small but net reduction in pilot demand for a couple years. Not long enough to solve the pilot shortage by any means.
If it correlates with a down economy and furloughs that wouldn’t have otherwise happened if the age didn’t change then yes people will leave.
Old 05-21-2022 | 01:50 PM
  #264  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP

Mandatory airline retirements are THE singular reason for the industry’s dynamic movement and career progression. They are the rising tide that are lifting all ships across all segments of industry.
No. Years of no hiring and no progression are the reason for the rising tide. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
Old 05-21-2022 | 02:15 PM
  #265  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by dualinput
If it correlates with a down economy and furloughs that wouldn’t have otherwise happened if the age didn’t change then yes people will leave.
We are nowhere near furloughs. Global pandemic and ground war in Europe involving the red army have not caused an economic collapse.

The presumed looming recession is not likely to be that bad. I wouldn't lose sleep over this just yet.
Old 05-21-2022 | 03:24 PM
  #266  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

You may want to save your emotions. We are all just pawns.

ALPA sold us out last time and they will again.

This is a done deal because tier 2 carriers SWA JetBlue Alaska Spirit Frontier would be able to staff. The regionals are collapsing.

United and Delta don’t want to raise the age because they don’t have that problem and would love if tier 2 carriers can’t grow or even staff what the have currently.

Its getting worse by the day.
Old 05-23-2022 | 05:33 AM
  #267  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,245
Likes: 98
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
We are nowhere near furloughs. Global pandemic and ground war in Europe involving the red army have not caused an economic collapse.

The presumed looming recession is not likely to be that bad. I wouldn't lose sleep over this just yet.
I guess I'd be the contrarian....the feds have been spending like a drunken sailor on a 401k loan. This inflation is a truly regressive tax that over time will kill the demand in many industries. We are doing everything to make sure oil stays high for quite some time, that's a huge tax that will effect all industries.

There was a pent up demand from the pandemic that we are working through, but unfortunately I sense that much like a party that has gone on a little too long, the hangover will strike and make many have a severe headache.

I truly hope you are right though, but I've been doing this long enough to see how demand/revenues can shrivel in a heartbeat and the airlines are left in a quandary with too much lift and too many employees in the span on one quarter.
Old 05-23-2022 | 06:41 AM
  #268  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,114
Likes: 794
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by nene
I guess I'd be the contrarian....the feds have been spending like a drunken sailor on a 401k loan. This inflation is a truly regressive tax that over time will kill the demand in many industries. We are doing everything to make sure oil stays high for quite some time, that's a huge tax that will effect all industries.

There was a pent up demand from the pandemic that we are working through, but unfortunately I sense that much like a party that has gone on a little too long, the hangover will strike and make many have a severe headache.

I truly hope you are right though, but I've been doing this long enough to see how demand/revenues can shrivel in a heartbeat and the airlines are left in a quandary with too much lift and too many employees in the span on one quarter.
CEO's and business media are also anticipating a mild recession.

It is true that there's a cost to all of the covid largess.

Also true that we are intentionally accepting at least some pain to put the stake in Uncle Vlad. I give the administration some pass on that because most Americans want to do it, including me. You can debate until you're blue in then face as to how much of the pain is due to pre-Biden covid assistance, post-Biden covid assistance, Biden policies in general, or RU sanctions. It's probably all of the above, but we shouldn't debate that here.
Old 07-02-2022 | 05:37 AM
  #269  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
Great. More babysitting.
Remember older guys babysit the younger ones. That's the definition of " babysitting" and I've done plenty of that thank you. All for age 67/68. Not just an ALPA talking point stooge I can actually think with my own brain.
Old 07-02-2022 | 06:39 AM
  #270  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,496
Likes: 138
Default

Kids scarcely out of HS flattened a Reich & sank a rising sun. With adequate oversight of course they can be qualified to operate advanced airliners in number quickly enough to address the issue. Lucky them. According to its secretary this week, the DOT backs no change on age policy.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SonicFlyer
Major
254
01-28-2022 04:58 PM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices