Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67) >

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2024 | 07:00 AM
  #3021  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I'm making a point... "safer is better" isn't always practical.

In 121 we actually already have a benchmark number: 10^-9

They should try to align retirement age with that. Even then it might not be practical, but we don't know.
Safer isn't always practical....

Sounds like we have a mod that's secretly an executive for Boeing.
Old 02-06-2024 | 07:13 AM
  #3022  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 590
Likes: 176
Default

Originally Posted by guppie
This business is ripe with new hire geniuses that will retire early with 10M in their B-fund. (I was certainly one of them) Just look at the seniority progression reports.... ALL y'all will be WB captains in like xx years!! That 17% B/C fund pumping. And that's with NO GROWTH!! What could go wrong? Like Tyson said, everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth. I'm not special, but I am typical of a guy who's been here 25+ years and managed to miss the furloughs. So I will post these fun facts as a history lesson for those of you who think all of the old guys are just idiots with poor financial planning skills.

My first 3 years at UAL. Avg annual pay $47K (about $88K in 2024 dollars) B-fund contribution was 1 or 2% as we were getting ESOP stock instead (later made worthless in the bankruptcy) But hey, we had a pension, so not bad!!

Contract 2000 money was eye watering. Plus the ESOP was over and we went back to a 9% B-fund contribution. YEE HAW. I avereraged $135K the next 3 years as a WB bunkie ($234K in 2024 dollars)

In 2001 United parked 2 fleets and announced the furlough of 22% of our pilots. The next few years were horrible. Furloughs, bankruptcies, mortgage defaults, divorces, and suicides.... not pretty.

Contract 2003 was the bankruptcy contract sporting a 28% decrease in payrates compounded by all the downgrade paycuts and shinkage.

I earned an average of $103K ($150k in 2024 dollars) for the next 9 years throwing gear in the guppy and the 757. That average includes 18 months as Guppy Captain at $130/hr ($198/hr in 2024 dollars) before being downgraded during the financial crisis and Age 65. And I was one of the lucky ones. No furloughs!

That's how the first 15 years of my career went.... ymmv. Good luck.

I finally made Captain (on reserve) in domicle in my 18th year. Been "feeding at the trough" since then I guess.

Disclamer: I do NOT advocate a change in the retirement age, I BACK THE PAC to the max and I'm VERY pleased with how ALPA has been able to hold this off as long as we have. It's just disgusting to read the comments from the know it all newbs. I get it, you've got the world by the balls... but the world can (and probably will) fight back. Know your history. Come talk to us at the end of your career.
It's been the Pro-67 guys too "forgetting" history trying to sell the young guys on 67 because there is no way the young persons career will face the same or similar situations they had and the young persons careers will be sunshine and rainbows so lets just give them 2 more years......
Old 02-06-2024 | 07:47 AM
  #3023  
khergan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 691
Likes: 236
Default

Cheers to the FAA administrator coming out aganist this.

Not sure it will overcome the greed of the pro-67 crowd, but at least it's a step in the right direction.
Old 02-06-2024 | 08:09 AM
  #3024  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,164
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by bugman61
My guess is the letter ensures that the senate committee doesn’t pass the Blackburn amendment to include age 67 in the reauthorization this week. It also gives cover to supporters of the standalone LEPF act to not fight to add it in the full senate.

A floor amendment is certainly still possible, or an agreement in conference, but it seems far less likely than 24 hours ago.
I don't think the letter matters much, nobody cares what auto workers think about pilot age. It's a data point, and may bring some attention to the issue.

Originally Posted by Me103
I would say it's not the FAA letter, but this quote that's the death knell:

"When it comes to raising the pilot retirement age, the FAA has made clear that a scientific and safety analysis must come first. That has not happened. Aviation safety is paramount, and now is not the time to take a shortcut," said Senator Maria Cantwell, the committee chair.
Not a death knell, but another data point.

If the Senate passes the reauth without 67, it still has to go to committee with the house.

Senate sending it without age 67 to make a point is one thing, and fairly routine.

Senate trading something valuable with the house to get 67 removed from the HR is a different thing.

Senate refusing to pass the reauth over 67 is another thing entirely.

My guess is making a point, everybody in the labor union corner is getting their sound bite in. Committee is where they'll have to put their money where their mouth is. We'll know shortly.
Old 02-06-2024 | 08:10 AM
  #3025  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by guppie
This business is ripe with new hire geniuses that will retire early with 10M in their B-fund. (I was certainly one of them) Just look at the seniority progression reports.... ALL y'all will be WB captains in like xx years!! That 17% B/C fund pumping. And that's with NO GROWTH!! What could go wrong? Like Tyson said, everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth. I'm not special, but I am typical of a guy who's been here 25+ years and managed to miss the furloughs. So I will post these fun facts as a history lesson for those of you who think all of the old guys are just idiots with poor financial planning skills.

My first 3 years at UAL. Avg annual pay $47K (about $88K in 2024 dollars) B-fund contribution was 1 or 2% as we were getting ESOP stock instead (later made worthless in the bankruptcy) But hey, we had a pension, so not bad!!

Contract 2000 money was eye watering. Plus the ESOP was over and we went back to a 9% B-fund contribution. YEE HAW. I avereraged $135K the next 3 years as a WB bunkie ($234K in 2024 dollars)

In 2001 United parked 2 fleets and announced the furlough of 22% of our pilots. The next few years were horrible. Furloughs, bankruptcies, mortgage defaults, divorces, and suicides.... not pretty.

Contract 2003 was the bankruptcy contract sporting a 28% decrease in payrates compounded by all the downgrade paycuts and shinkage.

I earned an average of $103K ($150k in 2024 dollars) for the next 9 years throwing gear in the guppy and the 757. That average includes 18 months as Guppy Captain at $130/hr ($198/hr in 2024 dollars) before being downgraded during the financial crisis and Age 65. And I was one of the lucky ones. No furloughs!

That's how the first 15 years of my career went.... ymmv. Good luck.

I finally made Captain (on reserve) in domicle in my 18th year. Been "feeding at the trough" since then I guess.

Disclamer: I do NOT advocate a change in the retirement age, I BACK THE PAC to the max and I'm VERY pleased with how ALPA has been able to hold this off as long as we have. It's just disgusting to read the comments from the know it all newbs. I get it, you've got the world by the balls... but the world can (and probably will) fight back. Know your history. Come talk to us at the end of your career.
I appreciate you sharing your experience but I don't know how you reached the conclusion that us newbs think we know everything or that we think we're gonna all be financial prodigies that are gonna retire early. Our entire argument against 67 is based on having learned about your past experiences. About how it will invariably erode at our retirement benefits long term as a profession. Acknowledging the cyclical nature of the industry and knowing the good times won't last forever. It's the senior guys saying "hey look at all this hiring! Clearly your gonna have a better career than me so give me 67 please". It's eiyher embarrassingly shortsighted or wilfully ignorant and malicious.

Reading and learning about deregulation and the industry is precisely why Im convinced an age extension is ammo in managements pocket, not ours or the Unions.
Old 02-06-2024 | 08:14 AM
  #3026  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: B-737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by khergan
Cheers to the FAA administrator coming out aganist this.

Not sure it will overcome the greed of the pro-67 crowd, but at least it's a step in the right direction.
I would expect no less from a Biden appointee. The Biden administration (via Buttigieg, Sect of Transportation) came out against age 67 over a year and a half ago when Lindsey Graham (R) first introduced the bill in the Senate.

Back the PAC!
Old 02-06-2024 | 08:16 AM
  #3027  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by guppie
I would expect no less from a Biden appointee. The Biden administration (via Buttigieg, Sect of Transportation) came out against age 67 over a year and a half ago when Lindsey Graham (R) first introduced the bill in the Senate.
This isnt a left vs right thing...
Old 02-06-2024 | 08:30 AM
  #3028  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
it was DOA until a Delta 350 captain convinced his corrupt Congressman brother (Troy Nehls) to hook him up with another couple of years at the top.
There's a congress hearing on it today, with Troy Nehls in attendance. It's pretty clear he's just taking marching orders from his brother/LEPF. Basically every person in attendance took one or two turns asking well crafted and important questions, mostly on Boeing. When Nehls gets the microphone, it's incoherent yelling and rambling for about a minute, barely allowing Whitaker to answer. He then yields his time multiple times to probably get feedback and additional speaking points from his brother/LEPF. Some of his incoherent ramblings include comparing basic med to age 67, and that Taylor Swift flys on supersonic jets by age 67+ pilots (seriously). He took the microphone at least 5 times for these ramblings while everyone else spoke once or twice in real engaged conversation and concern on getting an FAA authorization passed. It's quite eye opening and concerning how this came to be.

Last edited by dailyops; 02-06-2024 at 08:43 AM.
Old 02-06-2024 | 08:35 AM
  #3029  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: B-737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
This isnt a left vs right thing...
Age 67 passed the House Committee 32-31 with ALL democrats voting against. That's how it made it on the House version of Reauthorization. The ONLY reason it hasn't done the same in the Senate is because the Senate is BLUE. Pay attention and vote accordingly.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/14/hous...-shortage.html
Old 02-06-2024 | 08:37 AM
  #3030  
merlinj79's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 2
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by dailyops
There's a congress hearing on it today, with Troy Nehls in attendance. It's pretty clear he's just taking marching orders from his brother/LEPF. Basically every person in attendance took one turn asking well crafted and important questions, mostly on Boeing. When Nehls gets the microphone, it's incoherent yelling and rambling for about a minute, barely allowing Whitaker to answer. He then yields his time multiple times to probably get feedback and additional speaking points from his brother/LEPF. Some of his incoherent ramblings include comparing basic med to age 67, and that Taylor Swift flys on supersonic jets by age 67+ pilots (seriously). He took the microphone at least 5 times for these ramblings while everyone else spoke once in real engaged conversation and concern on getting an FAA authorization passed. It's quite eye opening and concerning how this came to be.
Everybody should spend some time watching CSPAN.

Last edited by merlinj79; 02-06-2024 at 09:05 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices