Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Age 67 bill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2023 | 05:00 PM
  #31  
1Bob's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
Wait, you can start a thread here with your first post?

Also, hard "NO". 2 more years of savings on the back end isn't going to catch anyone up on their 40+ years of savings for retirement.
IDK, $500K - $1+M depending on what/how much you fly seems like a decent "catch up".
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 05:05 PM
  #32  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 161
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

Originally Posted by 1Bob
IDK, $500K - $1+M depending on what/how much you fly seems like a decent "catch up".
If your expenses are "zero", and you don't pay taxes, sure. Although a million ain't what is used to be. Flying premium time at that age seems depressing beyond belief.

But if you were in that situation already (Zero debt, tax write offs due to numerous rentals, small business ownerships, etc), you wouldn't be in this scenario at age 65 anyway.

You can't stop smoking with a Stage IV lung cancer diagnosis and hope to survive.

Retirement is the same way. It takes decades of living below your means.

"The "D**do" of consequences for your actions rarely arrives lubed."
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 05:06 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,095
Likes: 458
Default

Originally Posted by 1Bob
IDK, $500K - $1+M depending on what/how much you fly seems like a decent "catch up".
If you didn't save enough by now, you're not magically going to become financially responsible in the next two years.
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 05:43 PM
  #34  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Boohoo funding your own retirement? Much rather have our DC than ANY kind of pension. Everyone is all about personal responsibility here until it comes to funding your own retirement.
Um, pretty sure you read WAY too much into what I posted. The argument being floated is we don’t get SS until 67 and we are forced to retire. I merely pointed out that the other 2 jobs used as an example of others being forced to retire had pensions.

I’m here because I like my money in my own name. And I don’t plan on being here at 65, much less 67. And neither do I support it.

Take your condescending boohoo and shove it.
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 06:04 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 473
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by lake
Think about it. It's the only industry where the US government makes you retire at 65 but won't let you collect full SS until 67 ish. So i would support this bill based on that alone. When you personally choose to retire is your business.
SS is not a retirement plan. The old age insurance afforded through SS was originally set for an age beyond life expectancy.
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 08:00 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,095
Likes: 458
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
Um, pretty sure you read WAY too much into what I posted. The argument being floated is we don’t get SS until 67 and we are forced to retire. I merely pointed out that the other 2 jobs used as an example of others being forced to retire had pensions.

I’m here because I like my money in my own name. And I don’t plan on being here at 65, much less 67. And neither do I support it.

Take your condescending boohoo and shove it.
Sorry, didn't mean to be condescending or direct it towards you. I'm just sick off this min balance discussion. My bad though.
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 08:05 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Like most of you I’m opposed.

The facts are that the pilot pool is not adequate.

By summer Delta and United will be hiring 1500 hour pilots.

Tier 2 carriers will be unable to grow and some will have to shrink.

Delta is printing money and will grow as fast as possible. United is growing twice as fast.

The regionals are in a free fall and service to small towns will suffer in a big way. Guess who they complain to?

Cities like Toledo, Ohio have completely lost commercial air service.

Congress has no choice but to raise the age.

Last edited by gzsg; 01-02-2023 at 08:27 PM.
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 08:26 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by interceptorpilo
This is simply not true. Federal Law Enforcement Officers must retire by 57. I am sure there are other examples.
Originally Posted by Planetrain
Forgot Air Traffic Controllers, 56.
Originally Posted by crewdawg
I'm not for raising the retirement age, but he does bring up a good point. If we're forced by the government to retire at 65, we should be able draw full social security at 65.
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
Negotiated by the ATC controller union. Everyone hired pre-age 56 contract was grandfathered in and could work until they stroked out at their screens or died of asbestos poisoning . And those those guys had a defined benefit pension with a COLA, which made sticking around extra-stupid.

(I think age 65 is stupid for pilots, btw. Age 67 is ridiculous.)
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
They have a pension, at least federal law enforcement. Not 100% about ATC.

Edit: someone above said it, they have pensions too. Not saying this is a reason to go to 67, but that’s a big difference when you are funding your own retirement.
Air traffic controllers are required to retire by federal law by the age of 56. There are exceptions for those hired before a certain years depending on whether they were dot, dod, or fss. There is also an exemption they can apply for to work until 61 but I’ve never heard of that happening from the few friends I have that are ATC. They can retire with their pension at the age of 50 if and 20 years of service or 25 years of service at any age.

Their pension is 1.7% for the first 20 years plus 1% for thereafter of their high 3. They are required to partially fund that pension at 1.3% but they do get a retirement supplement that approximates their social security until they reach 62. They do get a year COLA.

They also get a 5% match into their TSP.
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 08:32 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Like most of you I’m opposed.

The facts are that the pilot pool is not adequate.

By summer Delta and United will be hiring 1500 hour pilots.

Tier 2 carriers will be unable to grow and some will have to shrink.

Delta is printing money and will grow as fast as possible. United is growing twice as fast.

The regionals are in a free fall and service to small towns will suffer in a big way. Guess who they complain to?

Cities like Toledo, Ohio have completely lose commercial air service.

Congress has no choice but to raise the age.
And then what? They raise it, and in 2 years… do it again?
Reply
Old 01-02-2023 | 10:30 PM
  #40  
1Bob's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
If your expenses are "zero", and you don't pay taxes, sure. Although a million ain't what is used to be. Flying premium time at that age seems depressing beyond belief.

But if you were in that situation already (Zero debt, tax write offs due to numerous rentals, small business ownerships, etc), you wouldn't be in this scenario at age 65 anyway.

You can't stop smoking with a Stage IV lung cancer diagnosis and hope to survive.

Retirement is the same way. It takes decades of living below your means.

"The "D**do" of consequences for your actions rarely arrives lubed."
You have expenses whether you're retired or not. In one instance you have no income, in the other you have an extra $500K - $1+M.

Taxes sure, you're also collecting DC and getting medical insurance.

There are all kinds of reasons to not fly to 67, the money is not one of them.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bla bla bla
Regional
49
09-30-2007 07:56 AM
Airsupport
Regional
105
09-27-2007 05:04 AM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices