![]() |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3784364)
you cannot live indefinitely in international waters in a self sustaining manner. Due to international treaty, you cannot live in Antarctica.
You’re still subject to governance by those authorities, even if you don’t get caught. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3784371)
You never fail to live down to your reputation.
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3784360)
But bigger picture ... if you think that living in the Alaska or northern Canada wilderness is going to come with governance, you're just being obstinate. And there are plenty of other places on this globe where one need not be concerned about government. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3784364)
you cannot live indefinitely in international waters in a self sustaining manner. Due to international treaty, you cannot live in Antarctica.
Some states will never allow you to renounce, and if you're not under the tax jurisdiction of another recognized state (ie work permit) you'll still owe them. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3784269)
Everyone thinks that their particular proclivities are the necessary. It’s a meaningless platitude
|
Originally Posted by Verdell
(Post 3784419)
Alaska Department of Fish and Game might have something to say about this.
1.3 persons per square mile Alaska is a large, sparsely populated state. The land mass of the state encompasses 570,641 square miles, averaging a population density of just 1.3 persons per square mile. This is the lowest population density of any state. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3784266)
Government, by nature of it's inherent power, is inherently evil (it can't help itself). It is of course a necessary evil, but needs to minimized to the greatest practical extent, and carefully monitored.
|
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3784247)
If you know of a more successful one please share it with us.
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3784256)
now, sonic is completely ignoring that he doesn’t actually want to give up the benefits of society, only his obligation to it. The point remains, however, that there is nowhere on earth you can go to opt out.
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3784334)
I am still waiting for an example of a robust economy without either.
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3784340)
Good luck finding a better system than the US or some of the better western democratic countries and I am still waiting on that example of libertarian nirvana that so many seem to love using as their imaginary standard.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3784433)
They gotta find you first.
And the Dept of fish and game has a total of 1700 employees. |
Originally Posted by Extenda
(Post 3784351)
Whatever entirely flawed and broken system we have now has me, as an upper middle class delta captain, pretty much at the pinnacle of the human race as far as healthcare, safety, leisure activities, and overall general stability.
It’s wild that most of us don’t realize this. Yeah, the system could be better, but good lord look at your life now vs. what life was like for people 1000 years ago and what it is even now for 90% of people around the world. you should all be kissing your lucky stars the random lottery of birth has you where you are instead of dreaming about some utopia. History has also shaken out in your favor pretty well. I’d be cautious about wanting big change to whatever system we have now. 'At least they only beat me a couple of days of the week.' 'when they loaded me on the trains they were at least friendly about it' Stockholm syndrome much? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands